E-Class (W212) 2010 - 2016: E 350, E 550
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

2012 V6 Fuel Efficiency Increase

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 9, 2011 | 06:38 PM
  #1  
BenzMan369's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 639
Likes: 14
From: Suburban Phila., PA
2012 E350 Coupe
2012 V6 Fuel Efficiency Increase

Regarding the anticipated fuel efficiency increase to be seen with the U.S. version of the new 2012 V6 engine, following is from a MB release announcing the 2012 M Class to be introduced in September.

The E350 Sedan cannot of course be directly compared to the SUV in terms of expected fuel mileage. However, the percentage increase noted in the table may well be relevant.

Unfortunately, it appears the hoped for large increase in fuel efficiency for the U.S. version of the new motor will not be realized unless/until lean-burn and start-stop technology make it here eventually.

Hope this is of interest.


https://mbworld.org/m-class/the_all-...ynews.php#more
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2011 | 07:51 PM
  #2  
RJC's Avatar
RJC
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,061
Likes: 326
From: 2000 ft over the FL coast in a B-17
Various
Dissapointing and as expected since I checked out and posted the new CLS EPA #'s which was only a 1 mpg increase albeit with lots more power/torque so I guess we shouldn't complain.

Thanks for posting Al.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2011 | 10:46 AM
  #3  
silberrosa's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 663
Likes: 6
Hold on a second...Real fuel econ of new CLS V8

The new 2012 CLS EPA numbers are quite a bit better than the outgoing model.

2011 CLS550 14/21 $1300 GGT
2012 CLS550 17/26 $0 GGT
That is +3 mpg (21%) city and +5 mpg (24%) hwy.

2011 CLS63 AMG 12/18 $2600 GGT
2012 CLS63 AMG 16/25 $0 GGT
That is +4 mpg (33%) city and +7 mpg (39%) hwy.

All of this with engines of higher hp and tq. with max tq. at lower RPMs.

Of course we are talking about the new V6 but if the new V8s are any indication I like the direction things are going.

For a better indication, perhaps the new SLK350 is a good guide.
2011 SLK350 19/25 $0 GGT
2012 SLK350 20/29 $0 GGT
That is +1 mpg (5%) city and +4 mpg (16%) hwy.

Extrapolating to the E350 could mean:
2011 E350 17/24 $0 GGT
2012 E350 18/28 $0 GGT

...will be interesting to see how things turn out.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2011 | 12:24 PM
  #4  
BenzMan369's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 639
Likes: 14
From: Suburban Phila., PA
2012 E350 Coupe
Originally Posted by silberrosa
...will be interesting to see how things turn out.
Indeed. Thanks for posting.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2011 | 02:13 PM
  #5  
RJC's Avatar
RJC
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,061
Likes: 326
From: 2000 ft over the FL coast in a B-17
Various
Thumbs up Good News

That's more like it and what I had read quite some time ago. The loss of the guzzler tax is just another benefit of the 12's.

Thanks for posting.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2011 | 02:45 PM
  #6  
BudC's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,794
Likes: 3
From: Valley of the Sun, Arizona
2011 E550, 2013 GLK
Originally Posted by RJC
The loss of the guzzler tax is just another benefit of the 12's.
The EPA dropped the gas guzzler tax on my March 2011 build E550. Fuel economy ratings were increased to 15/23. If there is any improvement in the 2012 over my car, it's not worth it to me. I don't need the hassle of direct injection and turbo-charging nor do I want 4Matic.

Needless to say, I'm happy I was able to order a 2011 E550.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2011 | 03:08 PM
  #7  
RJC's Avatar
RJC
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,061
Likes: 326
From: 2000 ft over the FL coast in a B-17
Various
Glad you're content with an 11...
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:31 AM.