Sports Sedan? Really?
I'm in my second C300 in a week (Loaner), I used to dread them, with that crappy interior, but now I don't mind tossing them around (well, for me at least, I'm not a really aggressive driver) a bit, as it feels so little, durable, and nimble. A well composed almost-"Sport Sedan".
In Europe, most E's are 4-Baners, and low HP models. In fact, I guarantee, if they sold a 205 HP 4 Cylinder E-Class in the U.S, it would be the volume leader for the E, proving that 268 HP is more than enough for this cars common buyer (I hope they don't bring a 4-Banger E to the States though.... Please!). The new W204 facelift, and 2012 F10 5-Series are both getting 4-Cylinder Turbo's with decreased peak HP from their outgoing entry level motors, and they will surely be the volume leading sellers for both respective models.
I'm in my second C300 in a week (Loaner), I used to dread them, with that crappy interior, but now I don't mind tossing them around (well, for me at least, I'm not a really aggressive driver) a bit, as it feels so little, durable, and nimble. A well composed almost-"Sport Sedan".
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I had a new 2009 E350 and it felt coarse. Almost tractor-like. And it got coarser and noisier the high the rpms. This was a common comment on several of the reviews, too, when the W212 first arrived. "The E350 may be dressed to impress, but the engine never makes a truly favorable impression. The engine note is also displeasingly coarse under strong acceleration, and while the 7-speed automatic transmission helps make the most of the V-6’s limited power, it consistently vetoes runs to the redline."
Sure I agree that it's decent for a V6. But it still has that V6 characteristic which makes you say, "I shoulda had a V8."

I'd like to see Mercedes go back to an IL6 and just turbo charge it. I realize they went to a V6 a while ago because of limited engine bay space and the needed displacement increase, but why not an inline with forced induction. Both BMW's current and MB's previous IL6 motors are super smooth.
I had a new 2009 E350 and it felt coarse. Almost tractor-like. And it got coarser and noisier the high the rpms. This was a common comment on several of the reviews, too, when the W212 first arrived. "The E350 may be dressed to impress, but the engine never makes a truly favorable impression. The engine note is also displeasingly coarse under strong acceleration, and while the 7-speed automatic transmission helps make the most of the V-6’s limited power, it consistently vetoes runs to the redline."
Sure I agree that it's decent for a V6. But it still has that V6 characteristic which makes you say, "I shoulda had a V8."

I'd like to see Mercedes go back to an IL6 and just turbo charge it. I realize they went to a V6 a while ago because of limited engine bay space and the needed displacement increase, but why not an inline with forced induction. Both BMW's current and MB's previous IL6 motors are super smooth.
I had a new 2009 E350 and it felt coarse. Almost tractor-like. And it got coarser and noisier the high the rpms. This was a common comment on several of the reviews, too, when the W212 first arrived. "The E350 may be dressed to impress, but the engine never makes a truly favorable impression. The engine note is also displeasingly coarse under strong acceleration, and while the 7-speed automatic transmission helps make the most of the V-6’s limited power, it consistently vetoes runs to the redline."
Sure I agree that it's decent for a V6. But it still has that V6 characteristic which makes you say, "I shoulda had a V8."

I'd like to see Mercedes go back to an IL6 and just turbo charge it. I realize they went to a V6 a while ago because of limited engine bay space and the needed displacement increase, but why not an inline with forced induction. Both BMW's current and MB's previous IL6 motors are super smooth.
Just my opinion but heavy sedans aren't fun on the track. It's not so much about speed but picking your line and learning the apex that makes the track fun (I'm assuming your talking about a road track.) A lighter weight car that is BALANCED is what I want to look for, imho. Speed is kinda secondary, unless one is racing competitively but then that's why they have different classes. Anyway just my 2 cents.
But there is one thing that 993s have an issue with: valve guides. But not all motors will necessarily need a top end job. I've seen 993s with 100K miles plus on the same guides. The problem is the SAI port (due to US emissions regulations/OBDII) that can get clogged from the worn guides. A CEL will happen and that prevents it from getting successfully smog checked. But there are many work-arounds for the SAI issue aside from a $7k top end job. The 993 used a soft guide material just like the older BMWs (I had a 2002tii that had guide issues.) I haven't had a CEL ever and I pass the smog tests easy every time.
There are a couple of other little niggling things on 993s but easy to address. In the end, there are almost truly bulletproof. Truly the last of the hand-built, dry sump, air cooled sports cars left. My was around $75k MSRP and is still worth around $45k today. But you can find a C2 (not the S or the 4S) for $30-35k. So yeah, more than $25k but not that far off. A great thing is that the PCA (P Club of America) is very track oriented and there are loads of opportunities for members to track their cars. There's even Porsche Club Racing (with licensing levels) if you get serious (and have the $$)
I agree the Cayman is a great option, too. But about the same $$ as a nice 993 sample. The Cayman would be a much easier car to learn with and more instantly rewarding. I love driving them, they're so incredibly glued.
Just my opinion but heavy sedans aren't fun on the track. It's not so much about speed but picking your line and learning the apex that makes the track fun (I'm assuming your talking about a road track.) A lighter weight car that is BALANCED is what I want to look for, imho. Speed is kinda secondary, unless one is racing competitively but then that's why they have different classes. Anyway just my 2 cents.
I haven't really read about the new V6 but that should def help improve it.
That's funny. I wasn't sure if anybody knows where "I shoulda had a V8" came from. I love vegetable juice and actually make my own concoctions every day with a juicer. Yum. And in the evening you can add vodka.

It looked SO awesome, and indeed had a Muscle Car, unrefined (to todays standards) feel to the motor, when I started it up.
If I didn't need my second car to be so economical, reliable, and able to handle massive mileage, I would have bought it on the spot. Would be very cool to have alongside my W212.
But cruising long distance could tire one out a bit, relatively speaking (I could fall asleep easy driving a Mercedes, it's so relaxing.) Plus there's the sound and heat from the motor right behind your head. And it's small. It's definitely a sports car yet it feels like a Rolls Royce when you compare it to something like a Lotus Exige. It's nothing at all like a hardcore old school sports car, in fact it's very mild-mannered when you're just out cruising. I wouldn't hesitate at all to drive one across country, it would be a fun road trip adventure. And there's more storage space in a Cayman over the 997 (there's a storage space in the rear and there's the front trunk.)
You should drive one and see if it fits you. It's definitely a weekend car in my mind, but I know several people who use one as a daily. Fit and finish is superb and you can option it out (like any Porsche) with all the amenities you want or get the lightweight Cayman R instead.
The old story about Porsche not wanting to put a higher performance motor in them because people might stop buying 997s has some validity. The Cayman doesn't have prestige or iconic value that the 911 variants hold, but they could easily be argued to be a better over all handling sports car. They are just so perfectly balanced that it's scary. Mid-engine design really makes sense, just ask Ferrari.
Last edited by 220S; Jun 29, 2011 at 09:03 PM.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...port-dash.html
I remember another anecdote in a biography of Gilles Villeneuve about how he routinely drove rental cars until they were smoking heaps. The story I remember was funny -- the story teller (forgot who) rode shotgun, while Gilles' wife got in the backseat. She immediately dove for the floorboard -- "I can't watch!" Gilles proceeded to drive so fast that he bounced off of parked cars.






