Upper strut tower bar??




That took me back as well. I remember how happy I was that my '96 Mustang GT had one.... STOCK!!

I don't think M-B's require those unsightly things above the motors. They've stiffened these chassis' up in all the right ways, the W212 has a torsional rigidity figure of about 30K, I don't think a little bar up there would do anything but add weight.


Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

I run all these on my Lex for years...my frame is rigid as hell because of them.
Also, most of these items are under the car ...not viewable to the general public...not considered bling bling if you cant see them.
I run all these on my Lex for years...my frame is rigid as hell because of them.
Also, most of these items are under the car ...not viewable to the general public...not considered bling bling if you cant see them.
Last edited by thekurgan; Feb 1, 2012 at 09:53 AM.
http://www.uucmotorwerks.com/STB/wha..._bar_more.html
http://www.uucmotorwerks.com/STB/wha..._bar_more.html
Strut tower braces are functional devices on some cars and on other vehicles they are just a conversation piece.


".
...you now questioning whether our chassis need them or not...which I perceive that you acknowledge again...they do help rigidity.Whether they look good or not, that's subjective.
STBs, braces, links, and bars do stiffen up the body/frame...that's the fact!!
Last edited by PHML; Feb 1, 2012 at 02:18 PM.

http://www.uucmotorwerks.com/STB/wha..._bar_more.html

By this statement...you are acknowlegding to does provide "...structural integrity improvements for a stiffer strut setup".
Then you contradict yourself saying "...strut braces do nothing for rigidity...", and that "...braces, links and bars are more like 'bling bling'
".Then you go off topic
...you now questioning whether our chassis need them or not...which I perceive that you acknowledge again...they do help rigidity.Get off your soap box bro, and stop muddying up the topic.
Whether they look good or not, that's subjective.
STBs, braces, links, and bars do stiffen up the body/frame...that's the fact!!
You're constipated over this ...

If you find a machine to measure the twist before and after your braces on the E, that would be some sweet data.

Perhaps you do and can tell us . . .

What rear end gears are in your Bluetec?
I had heard that MBZ raised the ratios because, as someone said,
the late diesels are heavier than models that came before.

If you know or can discover, please tell us, and then I can figure what your overall gear ratios are
when you are in seventh speed and be able to ascertain how many revs you turn at 60 mph, etc.
Your answer is appreciated.

Derrel

Perhaps you do and can tell us . . .

What rear end gears are in your Bluetec?
I had heard that MBZ raised the ratios because, as someone said,
the late diesels are heavier than models that came before.

If you know or can discover, please tell us, and then I can figure what your overall gear ratios are
when you are in seventh speed and be able to ascertain how many revs you turn at 60 mph, etc.
Your answer is appreciated.

Derrel
http://www.edmunds.com/mercedes-benz...st-specs1.html
Transmission and axle ratios (x:1) I=4.38; II=2.86; III=1.92; IV=1.37; V=1.00; VI=0.82; VII=0.73; R=3.42; Final=3.07
Transmission and axle ratios (x:1)
I=4.38; II=2.86; III=1.92; IV=1.37; V=1.00; VI=0.82; VII=0.73; R=3.42; Final=3.07

Thank you sir! Much appreciated.
You have 2.2411s overall and my old CDI has 2.1995s. Yes indeed. MBZ did resort to lowering
the overall gear ratio to give the diesel some beans, and that cost 'em Fuel Economy.
No wonder many are complaining about lost performance.
That makes all the older common-rail diesels not only faster but more efficient.
A step backwards perhaps?

Now, who knows which rear end gears are in the 2007 - 2009 Bluetecs? Perhaps 2.82s?
The next day . .
NoFoolyn posted that his '07 Bluetec has 2.64 gears. He got that right out of his owners manual.
Makes his rearend ratio the same as my 2005 CDI, except his overall ratio is higher by ten (10) percent
because the 7G has a 0.73 seventh gear. So overall, 2.64 X .73 gives him a 1.9272 top gear.
Now you can see why I wish my old hotrod had the 7G tranny.
Doing the math, I figure only 1553 revs per mile. He says 1622 rpms at 60 mph.

Derrel
Last edited by Green E-300 DT; Feb 3, 2012 at 11:45 AM. Reason: Added information

My E350 4MATIC does not have any sort of strut brace


