Upper strut tower bar??
#4
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
18 Posts
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
That took me back as well. I remember how happy I was that my '96 Mustang GT had one.... STOCK!!
I don't think M-B's require those unsightly things above the motors. They've stiffened these chassis' up in all the right ways, the W212 has a torsional rigidity figure of about 30K, I don't think a little bar up there would do anything but add weight.
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
#9
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Waikele, Oahu, Hawaii
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
2011 GLK350 P1, Multi-media & AMG Pkg; 2010 E350 w/ prem 2; 2018 4Runner SR5 Prem. 4x4
I run all these on my Lex for years...my frame is rigid as hell because of them.
Also, most of these items are under the car ...not viewable to the general public...not considered bling bling if you cant see them.
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bergen Co,NJ
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
14' CLS550
I think its personal opinion if some people think the upper strut bar is "ugly".. I had one on my c300 as you can see in my avatar, A nice powder coated strut bar to dress up the engine bay doesnt hurt. Looked good when the hood was popped at car shows, I think it gives the car more character. Unless your racing on a track I dont find it necessary tho.
#11
Senior Member
are you running braces, links, and bars? if not, you shouldn't comment and give bad info.
I run all these on my Lex for years...my frame is rigid as hell because of them.
Also, most of these items are under the car ...not viewable to the general public...not considered bling bling if you cant see them.
I run all these on my Lex for years...my frame is rigid as hell because of them.
Also, most of these items are under the car ...not viewable to the general public...not considered bling bling if you cant see them.
Last edited by thekurgan; 02-01-2012 at 09:53 AM.
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,825
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
things with and without wheels
maybe this will help?
http://www.uucmotorwerks.com/STB/wha..._bar_more.html
http://www.uucmotorwerks.com/STB/wha..._bar_more.html
#13
Senior Member
maybe this will help?
http://www.uucmotorwerks.com/STB/wha..._bar_more.html
http://www.uucmotorwerks.com/STB/wha..._bar_more.html
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,825
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
things with and without wheels
I know that not all cars are built the same and maybe the e-class doesnt need it, I was only refering to the comment in post #8.
Strut tower braces are functional devices on some cars and on other vehicles they are just a conversation piece.
Strut tower braces are functional devices on some cars and on other vehicles they are just a conversation piece.
#15
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Waikele, Oahu, Hawaii
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
2011 GLK350 P1, Multi-media & AMG Pkg; 2010 E350 w/ prem 2; 2018 4Runner SR5 Prem. 4x4
thekurgan...make up your mind...you are contradicting yourself.
By this statement...you are acknowlegding to does provide "...structural integrity improvements for a stiffer strut setup".
Then you contradict yourself saying "...strut braces do nothing for rigidity...", and that "...braces, links and bars are more like 'bling bling' ".
Then you go off topic ...you now questioning whether our chassis need them or not...which I perceive that you acknowledge again...they do help rigidity.
Get off your soap box bro, and stop muddying up the topic.
Whether they look good or not, that's subjective.
STBs, braces, links, and bars do stiffen up the body/frame...that's the fact!!
I've had a lot of cars whereby the chassis needed them, this one, however, does not. I've not been many lexus and honda vehicles where the chassis didn't creek while ascending a driveway, so they probably do. My last car, the Z4M Coupe, was extremely stiff and needed nothing whereas my previous E30 and E36 needed x-braces and a triangular firewall-to-strut brace, as well as rear shock mount x-braces. Bending and twisting resistance in the engine bay does little to nothing across the engine, it must be a fully integrated triangular piece. Think about it, when will you have forces on opposing sides of the strut towers that high up? Forces occur against the strut and the control arms.
Doesn't really help, but it is a kick *** description of their product(s) . E36/E46 had minimal strut reinforcement bracing from the factory (even the convertible models, just had an x brace) whereas the E class has two extending from the firewall itself, and appear to be pretty beefy. E class isn't going to have 1g subjected to its chassis.
Whether they look good or not, that's subjective.
STBs, braces, links, and bars do stiffen up the body/frame...that's the fact!!
Last edited by PHML; 02-01-2012 at 02:18 PM.
#16
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Waikele, Oahu, Hawaii
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
2011 GLK350 P1, Multi-media & AMG Pkg; 2010 E350 w/ prem 2; 2018 4Runner SR5 Prem. 4x4
maybe this will help?
http://www.uucmotorwerks.com/STB/wha..._bar_more.html
http://www.uucmotorwerks.com/STB/wha..._bar_more.html
I agree...the question was NOT whether a car needed it or not...which for some reason it was being steered in that direction.
#17
Senior Member
thekurgan...make up your mind...you are contradicting yourself.
By this statement...you are acknowlegding to does provide "...structural integrity improvements for a stiffer strut setup".
Then you contradict yourself saying "...strut braces do nothing for rigidity...", and that "...braces, links and bars are more like 'bling bling' ".
Then you go off topic ...you now questioning whether our chassis need them or not...which I perceive that you acknowledge again...they do help rigidity.
Get off your soap box bro, and stop muddying up the topic.
Whether they look good or not, that's subjective.
STBs, braces, links, and bars do stiffen up the body/frame...that's the fact!!
By this statement...you are acknowlegding to does provide "...structural integrity improvements for a stiffer strut setup".
Then you contradict yourself saying "...strut braces do nothing for rigidity...", and that "...braces, links and bars are more like 'bling bling' ".
Then you go off topic ...you now questioning whether our chassis need them or not...which I perceive that you acknowledge again...they do help rigidity.
Get off your soap box bro, and stop muddying up the topic.
Whether they look good or not, that's subjective.
STBs, braces, links, and bars do stiffen up the body/frame...that's the fact!!
You're constipated over this ...
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
11 Posts
2012 S350 Bluetec 4Matic, Diamond White, P2
I noticed the other day that my Bluetec has a strut brace on only the driver's side front strut. It attaches from the top of the strut to the firewall of the car and is a very strong piece. Interesting that it is only on one side. Anyone have any idea why the Bluetecs would have this on just the one side? Do the Gassers have this (350's, 550's, AMGs?). I am wondering if it is to add additional strength for the extra torque. Just a wild assed guess.
#19
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Waikele, Oahu, Hawaii
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
2011 GLK350 P1, Multi-media & AMG Pkg; 2010 E350 w/ prem 2; 2018 4Runner SR5 Prem. 4x4
Not really...I just hate ppl who think they know *****...when they really don't know.
#20
Senior Member
If you find a machine to measure the twist before and after your braces on the E, that would be some sweet data.
#21
Super Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Murrieta, Southern California
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Late Built 2005 W-211 E-320 CDI
Don't Know but Perhaps You Do?
Perhaps you do and can tell us . . .
What rear end gears are in your Bluetec?
I had heard that MBZ raised the ratios because, as someone said,
the late diesels are heavier than models that came before.
If you know or can discover, please tell us, and then I can figure what your overall gear ratios are
when you are in seventh speed and be able to ascertain how many revs you turn at 60 mph, etc.
Your answer is appreciated.
Derrel
#22
Senior Member
Perhaps you do and can tell us . . .
What rear end gears are in your Bluetec?
I had heard that MBZ raised the ratios because, as someone said,
the late diesels are heavier than models that came before.
If you know or can discover, please tell us, and then I can figure what your overall gear ratios are
when you are in seventh speed and be able to ascertain how many revs you turn at 60 mph, etc.
Your answer is appreciated.
Derrel
http://www.edmunds.com/mercedes-benz...st-specs1.html
Transmission and axle ratios (x:1) I=4.38; II=2.86; III=1.92; IV=1.37; V=1.00; VI=0.82; VII=0.73; R=3.42; Final=3.07
#23
Super Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Murrieta, Southern California
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Late Built 2005 W-211 E-320 CDI
That was Quick
http://www.edmunds.com/mercedes-benz...st-specs1.html
Transmission and axle ratios (x:1)
I=4.38; II=2.86; III=1.92; IV=1.37; V=1.00; VI=0.82; VII=0.73; R=3.42; Final=3.07
Transmission and axle ratios (x:1)
I=4.38; II=2.86; III=1.92; IV=1.37; V=1.00; VI=0.82; VII=0.73; R=3.42; Final=3.07
Thank you sir! Much appreciated.
You have 2.2411s overall and my old CDI has 2.1995s. Yes indeed. MBZ did resort to lowering
the overall gear ratio to give the diesel some beans, and that cost 'em Fuel Economy.
No wonder many are complaining about lost performance.
That makes all the older common-rail diesels not only faster but more efficient.
A step backwards perhaps?
Now, who knows which rear end gears are in the 2007 - 2009 Bluetecs? Perhaps 2.82s?
The next day . .
NoFoolyn posted that his '07 Bluetec has 2.64 gears. He got that right out of his owners manual.
Makes his rearend ratio the same as my 2005 CDI, except his overall ratio is higher by ten (10) percent
because the 7G has a 0.73 seventh gear. So overall, 2.64 X .73 gives him a 1.9272 top gear.
Now you can see why I wish my old hotrod had the 7G tranny.
Doing the math, I figure only 1553 revs per mile. He says 1622 rpms at 60 mph.
Derrel
Last edited by Green E-300 DT; 02-03-2012 at 11:45 AM. Reason: Added information
#25
I noticed the other day that my Bluetec has a strut brace on only the driver's side front strut. It attaches from the top of the strut to the firewall of the car and is a very strong piece. Interesting that it is only on one side. Anyone have any idea why the Bluetecs would have this on just the one side? Do the Gassers have this (350's, 550's, AMGs?). I am wondering if it is to add additional strength for the extra torque. Just a wild assed guess.
My E350 4MATIC does not have any sort of strut brace