2010 E550: Coupe vs Sedan? Also triptronic questions...
At any rate, not to be mean, but have you done any research on the cars you're considering, aside from driving them and then asking for opinions here? You seem hung up on shift times, and you're asking people sell you on an E550 vs. E63 AMG vs. C63?
Not sure what kind of driving you're doing where that would matter or even add that much enjoyment to the car, but you're not going to find that in a mainstream MB. Auto magazines for good reason have CONSTANTLY refer to the lazy shifts in MBs (even engaging drive from reverse sometimes takes longer than expected), and they've been doing that for decades.
There are many reasons to buy an MB (pride of ownership, engineering, safety, resale value, ride/handling balance, interior fit and finish, overall drivability). Fast downshifts are not among the reasons....
And, as for finding a BMW w/ a manual transmission on the lot, good luck w/ that. You'd probably have to special order.
Get what you want (even if it's not an MB). And enjoy it. And don't worry about what any of us have to say ultimately, b/c we're just random people on a social forum! =)
.
The reason? When I drive the car, I'm going to be only driving in auto-manual the entire time (via paddles). If I feel that it is unnatural (i.e. sluggish), then it just kills the entire experience... I can't force myself to drive auto-manual if I don't believe it can replace the way I drive stick. It has to be sufficiently quick but not track quick.
IMHO, you don't choose a luxury sedan car b/c of its shift times. I don't know what kind of setting you're, but I can't imagine shift times "killing" the experience for someone, when the rest of the car (ANY car in the $50,000-60,000 range is going to be absolutely lovely) is so good.
You thought the GS was fine except for the power? You don't think a 300-hp car is powerful enough for daily driving?
Look, you're not just hung up on shift times. You're seeking automotive perfection. And I'm not sure what sort of issues shift times and horsepower are substituting for (and it's none of my business), but you're not going to find perfection or happiness in an E550, any AMG, or even a Panamera.... or in ANY car. ::shrug::
Focus on what's important in life.... And then shift times and horsepower won't seem that important. And you'll probably end up loving whatever you buy. Just my 2 cents....
Last edited by alsyli; Apr 9, 2012 at 01:12 AM.
The whole point of an E-Class is to deliver a smooth ride with smooth and unnoticeable shifts. Snapping and quick shifts are contrary to the point, for the most part.
IMO, it sounds like you're trying to force yourself into the wrong car for you.
The 5-Series is known as this segments "Jack of all trades, master of none". It's not as sporty as the A6 or GS (can't believe a BMW isn't known to be as sporty as its Lexus counterpart, but it's the way it is now in this segment), and it's not as smooth and ultra solid/luxurious as the E-Class. It's kind of in between, and has comparable HP to its M-B counterparts, and an 8-Speed tranny that's known to be a little jolty and delayed upon takeoff, yet more snappy and I'm sure quicker reacting than the M-B tranny.
Last edited by K-A; Apr 9, 2012 at 01:32 AM.
IMHO, you don't choose a luxury sedan car b/c of its shift times. I don't know what kind of setting you're, but I can't imagine shift times "killing" the experience for someone, when the rest of the car (ANY car in the $50,000-60,000 range is going to be absolutely lovely) is so good.
You thought the GS was fine except for the power? You don't think a 300-hp car is powerful enough for daily driving?
Look, you're not just hung up on shift times. You're seeking automotive perfection. And I'm not sure what sort of issues shift times and horsepower are substituting for (and it's none of my business), but you're not going to find perfection or happiness in an E550, any AMG, or even a Panamera.... or in ANY car. ::shrug::
Focus on what's important in life.... And then shift times and horsepower won't seem that important. And you'll probably end up loving whatever you buy. Just my 2 cents....
And yes, I feel that the GS is not powerful enough given that it is asking nearly 60K. At 60K, you are within striking range on an e550 which is significantly more powerful, you're also near an M3.
Is the GS powerful enough? Technically yes, but I think it is overpriced at 60K compared to the power that other cars offer at that price.
You're missing the whole point of this segment. Power isn't what dictates why these cars are priced where they are. I mean, the E350 with its 268 HP was slaughtering the competition who offered more power sometimes for less money, in sales. The 300 HP E350 now launched, and to prove that the buyers here don't determine HP as the ultimate "worth" of the cars they're shopping, sales are even down a tick.
I feel you need to figure out what you're really looking for.
I also recommend test driving a 335i. I drove a 328i and it's a very connected drive, and actually is surprisingly fast. The 335i I'm sure is gonna feel as fast if not faster than an E550 (at least the N/A version) and has "sportiness" determined more weightily in its (too high now) sticker price.
You're missing the whole point of this segment. Power isn't what dictates why these cars are priced where they are. I mean, the E350 with its 268 HP was slaughtering the competition who offered more power sometimes for less money, in sales. The 300 HP E350 now launched, and to prove that the buyers here don't determine HP as the ultimate "worth" of the cars they're shopping, sales are even down a tick.
I feel you need to figure out what you're really looking for.
I also recommend test driving a 335i. I drove a 328i and it's a very connected drive, and actually is surprisingly fast. The 335i I'm sure is gonna feel as fast if not faster than an E550 (at least the N/A version) and has "sportiness" determined more weightily in its (too high now) sticker price.
You see, this exposes that I am not in familiar territory. I'm not used to this kind of car segment. Hence, my lack of better judgement.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I do however question your want/need to drive in manual mode ALL the time. I personally think you won't because these cars drive better in auto mode. In auto mode the transmissions shift smoother and you really only need the paddles to pass or upshift early under hard acceleration.
Going down a big hill, if I want to maintain speed, I set the cruise, and this car will amazingly keep the cruise speed even when the momentum of the car wants it to go faster.
What the heck would I need the paddles for?
Something tells me that I am a fairly typical MB customer who is happy with a transmission that does all the work for me. If I wanted to shift, I'd buy a Porsche.
I do however question your want/need to drive in manual mode ALL the time. I personally think you won't because these cars drive better in auto mode. In auto mode the transmissions shift smoother and you really only need the paddles to pass or upshift early under hard acceleration.
I like the size of the Sedan, it's a "true E-Class", a more elegant and "serious" size. The E-Coupe being based on the C chassis gives it two drawbacks *to me* (I'm tall): Looks too cutely-proportioned/compact for an E-Class, the interior isn't nearly as stately or luxurious appearing (aside from the seats) as the Sedan, nor does it have the same cool all-around ambient lighting. Also, maybe it's in my head, but I don't like being duped into buying a car with an "E" badge and price that is based on a C and is the EXACT chassis used on the (IMO ugly) new C-Coupe. I think the W212 is a more aggressive look than the Coupe, not as sporty, but still sporty, and more stately (i.e more all around dynamic design), and is more true to the core of representing the M-B that I love (big-ish stately, almost mean yet understatedly elegant looking Sedans).
As for the 550, that's all you, i.e, it's all preference. I'm more than content with my E350's power (driving a Mustang 300+ HP new V6 right now, and my E actually feels quicker and snappier), so the 550 would have been pointless and the extra power/money mostly unused by me. But if you require that feel, then you might as well go for it.
OK!!! I'm kidding...you and I have been arguing about the coupe verses sedan since 2010. Guess it's best to just agree to disagree. However, I do remember when you absoutly hated the E sedan.
Last edited by steelgrey; Apr 9, 2012 at 11:59 AM.
OK!!! I'm kidding...you and I have been arguing about the coupe verses sedan since 2010. Guess it's best to just agree to disagree. However, I do remember when you absoutly hated the E sedan.
Saying the coupe is based on the c-class chassis is getting old... All the MB cars share very similar chassis designs. Is the E-sedan essentially a stretched C-class? Yes. However, the differences in the side members, roof, and other parts of the structure are quite different causing the cars to behave differently too.
Thats why the 211 and 219 chassis while they are both "E-class" chassis the 219 was a stiffer overall structure.
If it was me, I would not consider a new car until my school loans were paid and I was living in a nice house. Secondly you are looking at the wrong car. MB is the Buick of the premium market. It's an old man's car. You have an RX that will make a great family car and when you have a few bucks in the bank and no debt,go out and buy yourself a new Porsche. This ends all arguments and is the ultimate in performance yet it is civilized enough to be a daily driver.
The world will still be there tomorrow. Take a little extra time and do it right.
OK!!! I'm kidding...you and I have been arguing about the coupe verses sedan since 2010. Guess it's best to just agree to disagree. However, I do remember when you absoutly hated the E sedan.
Thats why the 211 and 219 chassis while they are both "E-class" chassis the 219 was a stiffer overall structure.
The E Coupe and C Coupe are on the EXACT same wheelbase. To me, that constitutes and unjustifiable "E" badging.
For styling, I think the Sedan is more dynamic because it looks both more aggressive/mean and stately at the same time. The Coupe looks softer, sleeker and more sensual. That's the whole point of it, of course. As for the front, that dominating powerful grille and hood Star are my favorite part, and very unique to it nowadays.
Last edited by K-A; Apr 9, 2012 at 07:20 PM.
If it was me, I would not consider a new car until my school loans were paid and I was living in a nice house. Secondly you are looking at the wrong car. MB is the Buick of the premium market. It's an old man's car. You have an RX that will make a great family car and when you have a few bucks in the bank and no debt,go out and buy yourself a new Porsche. This ends all arguments and is the ultimate in performance yet it is civilized enough to be a daily driver.
The world will still be there tomorrow. Take a little extra time and do it right.
And I agree about the Porsche... that might be the right answer (or the new M3?)...
And I agree about the Porsche... that might be the right answer (or the new M3?)...
Also back to the automatic driven in manual mode... the automatic is designed to work better in automatic mode. This is because based on throttle input, hills, steering angle, etc the computer can decide when and how to initiate the upshift. This makes it much smoother and less abrupt than using the manual paddle. Also on Mercedes vehicles, under hard acceleration the transmission will do pre shift preparation prior to shifting for a smoother quicker shift (clutch prefilling, etc)... if you are using manual mode the computer will not do this hence the long shift times.
Last edited by Kar don; Apr 10, 2012 at 12:28 AM.
Also back to the automatic driven in manual mode... the automatic is designed to work better in automatic mode. This is because based on throttle input, hills, steering angle, etc the computer can decide when and how to initiate the upshift. This makes it much smoother and less abrupt than using the manual paddle. Also on Mercedes vehicles, under hard acceleration the transmission will do pre shift preparation prior to shifting for a smoother quicker shift (clutch prefilling, etc)... if you are using manual mode the computer will not do this hence the long shift times.
And I agree about the Porsche... that might be the right answer (or the new M3?)...
I just purchased my first place a few months ago. I'm only working part time, but I carry NO long-term debt (didn't have the new car at the time), have fantastic credit, put 55% down on a place that wasn't even that expensive, and the bank STILL gave me hell.
And, trust me, your priorities about how you spend your $ will totally change when you have a mortgage and property tax to pay....
The E550 is a fantastic car and would be a huge upgrade from the Infiniti. You only live once and should enjoy the ride as much as possible.
Literally and figuratively
I find the way the tranny itself shifts is great. Quick, yet smooth. The 2012's probably shift even quicker/sportier hopefully without sacrifices any smoothness.
The E-Class is a very special car IMO, however you have to be buying it for the right reasons, or else you won't be happy with it.
I just purchased my first place a few months ago. I'm only working part time, but I carry NO long-term debt (didn't have the new car at the time), have fantastic credit, put 55% down on a place that wasn't even that expensive, and the bank STILL gave me hell.
And, trust me, your priorities about how you spend your $ will totally change when you have a mortgage and property tax to pay....
The E550 is a fantastic car and would be a huge upgrade from the Infiniti. You only live once and should enjoy the ride as much as possible.
Literally and figuratively

I find the way the tranny itself shifts is great. Quick, yet smooth. The 2012's probably shift even quicker/sportier hopefully without sacrifices any smoothness.
The E-Class is a very special car IMO, however you have to be buying it for the right reasons, or else you won't be happy with it.
Update:
I did find a car today that checked all the boxes off my list. It was the BMW 535i w/ M Sport package. It had the right amount of power, it had paddles and the transmission was SPOT ON quick... I drove it the entire time in manual mode w/o a problem.
Of course, there is the 550i M Sport, but I thought this was a tad overkill in power.
I find the 535i is the right balance for the 5-series. It's already pig heavy, huge and soft for a BMW traditionalist. The 550, with its 4500 lb, 400 HP and TT V8 just isn't the "BMW" that I seek. Heavy, gluttonous, and not that efficient form of squeezing out performance and HP out of minimalist motors and balanced chassis' that BMW does extremely well.
Last edited by K-A; Apr 11, 2012 at 04:11 AM.







