2011 vs 2012 E350 fuel mileage
You mpg readout is not like your speedometer, gas gauge, etc... its just a guesstimate.
You have never averaged 31+mpg in your E550 and you never will.
If you actually think that you can get 30+mpg then I dare you to plan a 600mi trip with a full 20g tank without stopping for gas... Good luck!
You mpg readout is not like your speedometer, gas gauge, etc... its just a guesstimate.
You have never averaged 31+mpg in your E550 and you never will.
If you actually think that you can get 30+mpg then I dare you to plan a 600mi trip with a full 20g tank without stopping for gas... Good luck!
our tanks are not even 20 gallons! lol!!
I don't understand why you're so abrasive towards people......
you're a real tool




You mpg readout is not like your speedometer, gas gauge, etc... its just a guesstimate.
You have never averaged 31+mpg in your E550 and you never will.
If you actually think that you can get 30+mpg then I dare you to plan a 600mi trip with a full 20g tank without stopping for gas... Good luck!
Last edited by HBerman; Nov 29, 2012 at 08:40 AM.




Last edited by HBerman; Nov 29, 2012 at 10:50 AM.
Just like no one questions DI's ability to deliver upto MB's claim of 20-25% better fuel economy for identical type of driving.
What is in question here is a stated claim of W212 DI V8 E550 to deliver 31 mpg highway and 26 mpg suburb(?) when MB states only 26 and 16("city") respectively, and non-DI W212 E550 26 highway and 21 suburb(?) while MB stated, if I recall correctly, only 22 and 16 respectively. Obviously noone know what MB means by "city" (Manhattan, LA, etc.) or what "suburb" is above. But let me assure you that E550s get nowhere close to 16mpgs in NYC bumper to bumper traffic or LA or Miami or others alike. What is interesting is that MB's stated "city" cycle is identical at 16mpgs for both engines. Is it a typo on MB part?
And oh ya hype, our tanks are 21.1 gallons.




2013 sticker states: City 16MPG, Hwy:26
Combined Fuel Economy on 2011: 18
Combined Fuel Economy on 2013: 20
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Just like no one questions DI's ability to deliver upto MB's claim of 20-25% better fuel economy for identical type of driving.
What is in question here is a stated claim of W212 DI V8 E550 to deliver 31 mpg highway and 26 mpg suburb(?) when MB states only 26 and 16("city") respectively, and non-DI W212 E550 26 highway and 21 suburb(?) while MB stated, if I recall correctly, only 22 and 16 respectively. Obviously noone know what MB means by "city" (Manhattan, LA, etc.) or what "suburb" is above. But let me assure you that E550s get nowhere close to 16mpgs in NYC bumper to bumper traffic or LA or Miami or others alike. What is interesting is that MB's stated "city" cycle is identical at 16mpgs for both engines. Is it a typo on MB part?
And oh ya hype, our tanks are 21.1 gallons.
(not being sarcastic)I just filled up today with the gas light on and I almost
used 18 gallons......which is what I thought the capacity was...
or there near about....
18. something...
the S mode helps with the lag slightly










