Same build added and missing accessories




Same packages, same color
Sounds like it could be some sneaky decontenting or minute switcharounds that happen during even same year model runs. My 2010 E350 for example had ridges around the aluminum window trim that you could see when you opened the door, while my 2011's was flat, which is kind of weird. Most notably and annoyingly is that my 2010 E's center console had a rubber extension that covered the slit in between the wishbone "doors", so you couldn't see inside of it. Starting with 2011 models (not sure if still), they removed that rubber extension and I could then see inside of the center console if I looked right at it, most annoyingly at night how the bright LED inside of it could be made out, and make out what I had inside. My dealer said it was a sneaky cost cutting move and were nice enough to make a little piece of black felt to cover up said little crease-hole.
Does this link help? My 2014 with a late build date looks like this. As far as the net goes they are really pushing the comfort cargo box, at a price of course.
http://www.mbusa.com/mercedes/vehicl...b=tab-interior
Last edited by wanderfalke; Nov 9, 2014 at 11:19 PM.
If you pay attention, automakers will often decontent and cost cut on the detail oriented bits of a car as the production goes on, and then make up or cover up for it in more obvious ways (as to distract from the decontenting), such as aluminum pedals (the wood is only for the W212 so likely is more costly to produce, while the pedals are probably universal), etc. Seems to be a pretty common tactic. I find a lot of the times that in terms of underlying details, the first model years tend to be the most detail oriented.

The part # for the 'tree nail' is # A212 810 0040 9B27; cost about $12.00 .
The cost accountants are likely responsible !

Rear headrest button still present on 06/14 production for Canadian E250BT; definitely missing from 09/14 MY2015 production.
Last edited by DerekACS; Nov 10, 2014 at 06:12 PM.
Trending Topics
difference between two cars,
the April built,
- missing a wood trim around the climate controls
- missing the trunk net on the right hand side of the trunk
- missing rear-headrest lower button
- has aluminum gas/ brake pedals
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The black trim piece looks sooo cheap, like an aftermarket piece of plastic.
The black trim piece looks sooo cheap, like an aftermarket piece of plastic.
What type of trim do you have beach bunny?




The de-contenting of the cars bothers me... I'd rather they raise the price. I know this segment of the auto industry is competitive, BUT are people in this segment really all that price-sensitive? I know I'm not like many buyers, but to me +/- $2.5k wouldn't change my mind between cars. It'd probably need to be a $5k difference before I'd start to consider something different.
While reliability generally improves as the models years move on, I've noticed and also seen interesting write-ups by people in the business of volume production, stating how in the first year, automakers will typically get the best materials and most exact tolerances, to ensure that they can minimize the typical first year issues as much as they can. Then, as the years go on, and possible glitches are sorted out, bean counters take over, de-content the detailed bits, tolerances get a little less tight, etc. while things like facelifts and the like train to mask that. Makes sense.




The first few model years had a 12V in the glove box- now gone.
2010 AMG had matching trim in the center console and AC surround later ones are all black plastic.
2014+ deletion of matching wood trim under the armrests on all four doors.
Running change in 2014 is the deletion of the headrest button.
Running change in 2014 is the deletion of AC surround trim in favor of matte black plastic (for non AMG).
No tree nail on later years.
etc.
At least these parts are easy to add on afterwards and not too expensive (check eBay) if you have a more common interior trim like Burlwood.
While reliability generally improves as the models years move on, I've noticed and also seen interesting write-ups by people in the business of volume production, stating how in the first year, automakers will typically get the best materials and most exact tolerances, to ensure that they can minimize the typical first year issues as much as they can. Then, as the years go on, and possible glitches are sorted out, bean counters take over, de-content the detailed bits, tolerances get a little less tight, etc. while things like facelifts and the like train to mask that. Makes sense.
There you go, you've been smoking the drapes again. Why do you make up such stupidity. The cars carry four years of full warranty not one. The cost of warranty exceeds the cost of reducing tolerances.
I'm still torn on it though -- I'd rather have the option of adding things than have them gone entirely. I know there are price targets they're trying to hit, and no one certainly expects a mass-produced E-Class to be built with no consideration to price like a 6.9, but I still miss things...especially that missing piece of wood -- it's something I'll see daily.



