E-Class (W212) 2010 - 2016: E 350, E 550

Could the W212 E63 really be slower than the W211?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-25-2015, 02:38 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Missionary's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
C63 2012 M156
Could the W212 E63 really be slower than the W211?

Hi Folks,

I been looking at a couple of 2010 E63s and they seemed a bit off expectations.

In comparison to the W211 they seemed:
Louder
More snatchy and unsettled in the transmission
Missing the OMG top end pull - just smooth up there...

Are they just that much more refined that they could feel slower or have I just driven a couple of lemons.

Help!
Old 07-25-2015, 10:22 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
rediesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,365
Received 59 Likes on 46 Posts
2006 E320 CDI 2014 C63 507 Coupe 2012 E550 4M 2016 E63s Wagon
Depends on what you drove. The W211 had the supercharged 5.5 E55 and went to the 6.3l E63. The W212 started with the 6.3l (M156) then went to twin turbo 5.5 (M157). The 6.3 is louder than the other two. The boosted engines have cheap tuning potential. 6.3l is a beast and obviously has potential (headers, tune, even supercharges are available) but cost quickly becomes an issue.

Transmission wise I'm not sure when they went from a torque converted 7g to the 7-speed MTC (clutch replaces torque converter).
Old 07-25-2015, 03:30 PM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Missionary's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
C63 2012 M156
Thanks redeisel, I realised I put this in the wrong forum. :/ I'll start it again in https://mbworld.org/forums/w212-amg-146/

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Could the W212 E63 really be slower than the W211?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:50 PM.