M550xi vs e43 vs s6
Super Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 842
Likes: 64
From: Northern NJ
2015 E550 Coupe
If you havent driven the 3.0 biturbo I strongly recommend you do so. Many v8s of old pale in comparison, plus it revs marvelously. Of course It cant compare to a modern turbo V8 but thats what the real AMG is for! Enginewise this engine apple to apple comparison should be the 535 not the 550.
Yes I would agree with you that the E43 would be more favorably compared to the 535 than the 550. A true apple to apple comparison.
Super Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 908
Likes: 19
From: New Jersey
2016 Audi S8 Plus/ 2011 Mercedes e550 4Matic//Gone:1985 500SEL/2000 e320 4Matic/ 2001 e55 Kleeman
I asked the MB dealer if I could take a quick test drive of the E43 a few weeks ago, when I bought my TTV8 E550 in for annual maintenance. Pretty slow day in the sales department. While the E43 is a big improvement over the E350 / E400, it's not quite there in terms of what I currently drive. For someone who is used to an AMG, like Peter, I think he might be significantly disappointed. That is why I suggested he might want to consider the supposed E50 as an alternative.
Yes I would agree with you that the E43 would be more favorably compared to the 535 than the 550. A true apple to apple comparison.
Yes I would agree with you that the E43 would be more favorably compared to the 535 than the 550. A true apple to apple comparison.
Thread Starter
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 13,799
Likes: 3,229
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ECU dyno tune; EDOK TCU tune; BB intakes; sprintbooster
Paul brings up excellent points as do you all and truth be told I have not yet driven the e43... this is on the must do list for this month
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,524
Likes: 1,181
From: WI
17 E43; 21 GLS580
I asked the MB dealer if I could take a quick test drive of the E43 a few weeks ago, when I bought my TTV8 E550 in for annual maintenance. Pretty slow day in the sales department. While the E43 is a big improvement over the E350 / E400, it's not quite there in terms of what I currently drive. For someone who is used to an AMG, like Peter, I think he might be significantly disappointed. That is why I suggested he might want to consider the supposed E50 as an alternative.
Yes I would agree with you that the E43 would be more favorably compared to the 535 than the 550. A true apple to apple comparison.
Yes I would agree with you that the E43 would be more favorably compared to the 535 than the 550. A true apple to apple comparison.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,524
Likes: 1,181
From: WI
17 E43; 21 GLS580
The merc is kind of a dog down low but if you check the 1/4 they are running neck and neck. Personally anything running around 4.5 to 60 is in the top5% anyway. My rentech c400 runs 4.7 to 60 with a 12.9 1/4 at 112mph. I would expect the E 43 to have identical if not slightly better numbers. It eats hemi chargers, stangs and camaros for lunch! Not bad for a taxi!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,524
Likes: 1,181
From: WI
17 E43; 21 GLS580
The merc is kind of a dog down low but if you check the 1/4 they are running neck and neck. Personally anything running around 4.5 to 60 is in the top5% anyway. My rentech c400 runs 4.7 to 60 with a 12.9 1/4 at 112mph. I would expect the E 43 to have identical if not slightly better numbers. It eats hemi chargers, stangs and camaros for lunch! Not bad for a taxi!
Thread Starter
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 13,799
Likes: 3,229
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ECU dyno tune; EDOK TCU tune; BB intakes; sprintbooster
The merc is kind of a dog down low but if you check the 1/4 they are running neck and neck. Personally anything running around 4.5 to 60 is in the top5% anyway. My rentech c400 runs 4.7 to 60 with a 12.9 1/4 at 112mph. I would expect the E 43 to have identical if not slightly better numbers. It eats hemi chargers, stangs and camaros for lunch! Not bad for a taxi!
the 550i is 12.7 @ ?
e43 I believe remains untested in the 1/4
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)
Verdad Gallardo
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,524
Likes: 1,181
From: WI
17 E43; 21 GLS580
I havnt seen any 1/4 mile numbers either. My expirience with the 3.0 its that it revvy and doesnt stop pulling till well over 130 (another plus of the aftermarket tune no limiter).
Thread Starter
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 13,799
Likes: 3,229
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ECU dyno tune; EDOK TCU tune; BB intakes; sprintbooster
Super Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 842
Likes: 64
From: Northern NJ
2015 E550 Coupe
Had the car for about 20 -25 minutes. As I said a short test drive, but long enough to get a pretty good feel for the car. Honestly, the 9 speed didn't feel drastically different from my 7 speed. Both equally smooth from a dead stop through accelerating up to 80 mph on the highway. The E43 is just a bit slower and the engine a bit louder at higher rpm. Performance difference of a V6 versus a V8 as your would expect. Nothing out of line. Again, for someone like Peter, who is used to driving a AMG, it will be a noticeable difference he may or may not appreciate. Especially if he is also looking at the BMW and Audi models mentioned.
Super Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 908
Likes: 19
From: New Jersey
2016 Audi S8 Plus/ 2011 Mercedes e550 4Matic//Gone:1985 500SEL/2000 e320 4Matic/ 2001 e55 Kleeman
Had the car for about 20 -25 minutes. As I said a short test drive, but long enough to get a pretty good feel for the car. Honestly, the 9 speed didn't feel drastically different from my 7 speed. Both equally smooth from a dead stop through accelerating up to 80 mph on the highway. The E43 is just a bit slower and the engine a bit louder at higher rpm. Performance difference of a V6 versus a V8 as your would expect. Nothing out of line. Again, for someone like Peter, who is used to driving a AMG, it will be a noticeable difference he may or may not appreciate. Especially if he is also looking at the BMW and Audi models mentioned.
Super Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 842
Likes: 64
From: Northern NJ
2015 E550 Coupe
what engine is in your e550? My 2011 e550 has the 5.5 liter naturally aspirated 380hp engine, the year before the engine change to the twin turbo. The e43 has the turbo 6 with 396hp so a bit more than my 2011. That should make for an interesting comparison. Wonder which engine I'll prefer. Regards. Ned.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,524
Likes: 1,181
From: WI
17 E43; 21 GLS580
[QUOTE=ngerstman;7013727]what engine is in your e550? My 2011 e550 has the 5.5 liter naturally aspirated 380hp engine, the year before the engine change to the twin turbo. The e43 has the turbo 6 with 396hp so a bit more than my 2011. That should make for an interesting comparison. Wonder which engine I'll prefer.
Regardless of power a v8 will always sound better than a v6. That said the E 43's piped in music is very fine indeed.
Regardless of power a v8 will always sound better than a v6. That said the E 43's piped in music is very fine indeed.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,524
Likes: 1,181
From: WI
17 E43; 21 GLS580
I Iwould also not be surprised if the 43 specs have been dumbed down a little bit to make the 63 seem that much different. If you have read the 63 reviews, if it werent for drift mode which disengages the front diff, there wouldnt be much power sliding . The fact is that once you reach a certain power level traction, downforce and other issues become more critical. On a staight line the more hp the harder you can accelerate at higher speeds. Ergo the difference becomes more pronounced the faster you go. The huge differences between the 43 and 63 are at 100mph plus.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,530
Likes: 387
Only MBs - the best or nothing
Official MBUSA.com 0-60 E43 number is 4.5sec, while (2017) E550 coupe is "only" at 4.9sec (for my 2014 W212 E550 with the same TT V8 engine as in a coupe, it was posted at 5.2 sec; just for comparison, for 2014 CLS550, also with the same engine, it was posted at 5.1 sec while now for 2017, with 9sp tranny instead of 7sp, its down to 4.9sec). And while I did not drive E43 yet, the numbers on paper are clearly in E43's favor over TT V8 in W212/218/207 550s.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,550
Likes: 745
From: Cary, NC
2024 AMG EQE SUV , 2021 E63S Wagon - gone, 2018 E63S Sedan - gone
Official MBUSA.com 0-60 E43 number is 4.5sec, while (2017) E550 coupe is "only" at 4.9sec (for my 2014 W212 E550 with the same TT V8 engine as in a coupe, it was posted at 5.2 sec; just for comparison, for 2014 CLS550, also with the same engine, it was posted at 5.1 sec while now for 2017, with 9sp tranny instead of 7sp, its down to 4.9sec). And while I did not drive E43 yet, the numbers on paper are clearly in E43's favor over TT V8 in W212/218/207 550s.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,530
Likes: 387
Only MBs - the best or nothing
Edit: I'd like to add that any seat of the pants acceleration comparison between W213 and W212 have one rarely mentioned phrase - "throttle delay" in all pre-facelift W212 cars. Somehow MB "fixed" this issue with 2014 W212 re-design (pre-facelift cars could be "fixed" by installing SB). W213 of course does not suffer from the throttle delay but the lack of torque down low (I'm talking about E300) is very noticeable as compared to 550s (but not 350s). So I take any such statements from prior TT V8 owners of E550 and CLS550 who moved onto W213 E300 with a big grain of salt. (One potential explanation is that maybe those in E550/CLS550 were driving only in E mode (instead in always S as there's a noticeable difference) and now they drive '17E300 only in Dynamic+ mode.)
Last edited by threeMBs; Jan 4, 2017 at 09:32 AM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,524
Likes: 1,181
From: WI
17 E43; 21 GLS580
That 6.3 figure is actually a litle optimistic the2 tests Ive seen by CR and KBB put the 300 at 7 sec. I drove it quite a bit and found the power on the 300 more than adequate.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,530
Likes: 387
Only MBs - the best or nothing
I would ignore any "tests" (especially those "showing" E300 to be slower than E350 - its not). Lets compare apples to apples and use only the "official" MB numbers posted on mbusa.com. 6.3sec is the number for E300 (it was 6.5 for E350). The E43 number is 4.5sec, so for anyone loading E300 with options, well I think its no brainer to take E43 instead for $10K MSRP more (of course the actual transaction price difference will be greater due to E300 discount and lack of it for E43).
Last edited by threeMBs; Jan 4, 2017 at 09:41 AM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,524
Likes: 1,181
From: WI
17 E43; 21 GLS580
I cant opine on the 350 since I never drove it. I would check CR on that. Their speeds are slower than anyone elses but they are consistent. Their speed test is simply stomp and go, which is what 99% of us do every day.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,524
Likes: 1,181
From: WI
17 E43; 21 GLS580
Ok visited CR for the 350 vs 300. The 350 was 6.3 and the 300 is 7.1 a significant if not huge difference. However the transmission makes a big difference in feel and drivability that is not reflected in absolute numbers. The 9g seems to always pick the perfect gear for best performace regardless of the situation, thus it never feels flatfooted. The 9g is an admirable partner to the 4.
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 171
Likes: 11
2017 S550, 2017 C63S, 2019 Raptor
I would ignore any "tests" (especially those "showing" E300 to be slower than E350 - its not). Lets compare apples to apples and use only the "official" MB numbers posted on mbusa.com. 6.3sec is the number for E300 (it was 6.5 for E350). The E43 number is 4.5sec, so for anyone loading E300 with options, well I think its no brainer to take E43 instead for $10K MSRP more (of course the actual transaction price difference will be greater due to E300 discount and lack of it for E43).
I'm looking st an e43 today and edmunds TMV is nesrly 5k off MSRP. When I spoke to the dealer Saturday they said it would be sub MSRP in the e43 if I wanted to go,that way.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,530
Likes: 387
Only MBs - the best or nothing
