Tire and brake condition after 6700 miles




I was pleasantly surprised to find that there is no measurable wear on the front rotors. The 370mm rotors are from a W223 S-class (PN: 223-421-42-00) and I suspect the calipers and brake pads are also shared with the W223 S-Class. The minimum thickness for the front rotors is 34mm and the measured thickness at 6,700 miles is 35.99mm. The brake recuperation is going to extend the life of the rotors and pads beyond what S-Class owners experience. The friction material on the front pads is 11.5mm thick. I am assuming that it is about 12mm when new. There is virtually no brake dust on the E53 wheels.
I think the rotors and pads could easily make it to 100,000 miles, especially if Lane Keep Assist is turned off.
Last edited by LAZARU5; Mar 11, 2025 at 02:53 PM.




Both front and rear brake pads seem to be about 2mm thicker than they were on my EQS SUV. The difference is that the part numbers for rotors and pads on the EQS were specific to the EQS Sedan and SUV chassis, whereas the E53 Hybrid shares brake components with other ICE vehicles in MB's product line. Less frequent brake pad and rotor maintenance will effectively reduce the premium for the E53 Hybrid over the previous generation W213 E53.
When I had the rear wheel off the car I re-measured the tread depth. As it turns out the outer grooves are 8/32" and the inner grooves are closer to 7/32" which usually occurs when tires are overinflated. The label on the driver's door jamb specifies cold tire pressures of 38/49 psi for front/rear tires. The label on the inside of the gas cap cover specifies tire pressures of 36/45 psi for 3 occupants and 38/49 psi for 5 passengers. I lowered the tire pressure in an effort to improve ride comfort and tire wear on the rear tires.








Last edited by LAZARU5; Mar 16, 2025 at 09:44 AM.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




Mathematically this is correct: As the overall circumference of the tire must remain the same, the sidewall decreases/increase 1/2" for every inch of change in the wheel size.
see: https://www.google.com/search?q=chan...hrome&ie=UTF-8
Last edited by JTK44; Mar 16, 2025 at 10:22 AM.




Hopefully the same on the W214.








Mathematically this is correct: As the overall circumference of the tire must remain the same, the sidewall decreases/increase 1/2" for every inch of change in the wheel size.
see: https://www.google.com/search?q=chan...hrome&ie=UTF-8
Front sidewall height:
265/40-R20 = 265 x .40 = 106mm
255/45-R19 = 255 x .45 = 114.75mm (8.75mm = 0.344")
245/45-R19 = 245 x .45 = 110.25mm (4.25mm = 0.167")
Rear sidewall height:
295/35-R20 = 295 x .35 = 103.25mm
285/40-R19 = 285 x .40 = 114mm (10.75mm = 0.423")
275/40-R19 = 275 x .40 = 110mm (6.75mm = 0.266")
Since I was considering the narrower 19" wheels (available in the USA) with 245/45-R19 and 275/40-R19 tires I rounded the sidewall height difference to 1/4" in my previous post. I did note that the 255/45-R19 and 285/40-R19 tires could be mounted on the 9.0"/9.5" wide 19" wheels. But even those tires would be less than a 0.500" difference than the 20" tires on my car.




Front sidewall height:
265/40-R20 = 265 x .40 = 106mm
255/45-R19 = 255 x .45 = 114.75mm (8.75mm = 0.344")
245/45-R19 = 245 x .45 = 110.25mm (4.25mm = 0.167")
Rear sidewall height:
295/35-R20 = 295 x .35 = 103.25mm
285/40-R19 = 285 x .40 = 114mm (10.75mm = 0.423")
275/40-R19 = 275 x .40 = 110mm (6.75mm = 0.266")
Since I was considering the narrower 19" wheels (available in the USA) with 245/45-R19 and 275/40-R19 tires I rounded the sidewall height difference to 1/4" in my previous post. I did note that the 255/45-R19 and 285/40-R19 tires could be mounted on the 9.0"/9.5" wide 19" wheels. But even those tires would be less than a 0.500" difference than the 20" tires on my car.
I calculate the sidewall height at:
Front sidewall height:
265/40-R20: 4.17 inches
245/45-R19: 4.34 inches
255/45-R19: 4.51 inches
Rear sidewall height:
295/35-R20: 4.06 inches
275/40-R19: 4.33 inches
285/40-R19: 4.48 inches




The rolling circumference of a tire is the distance it travels in one complete revolution, calculated by multiplying the tire's diameter by 3.14 (pi).
The diameter of each wheel is:
265/40-R20: 720 mm
245/45-R19: 703 mm
255/45-R19: 712 mm
see: https://alloywheels.com/tyreCalculator
To determine rolling circumference multiply diameter by 3.14 (pi) then divide by 25.4 to convert to inches:
The rule of thumb is that the rolling diameter should be within 1%:
265/40-R20: 720 mm X 3.14 = 2260.8/25.4 = 89 inches
245/45-R19: 703 mm X 3.14 = 2207.4/25.4 = 86.9 inches
255/45-R19: 712 mm X 3.14 = 2235.7/25.4 = 88.0 inches
While the 265/40-R20 and the 255/45-R19 are within 1% of the narrower tire, 245/45-R19, the 245/45-R19 is not within 1% of the 265/40-R20.
I would suggest making sure of the different wheel sizes before ordering.
see: https://www.google.com/search?q=roll...hrome&ie=UTF-8
Just my $.02
Last edited by JTK44; Mar 16, 2025 at 02:03 PM.




