E-Class (W214) 2024 -

Motor Trend E53 Wagon test

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 14, 2025 | 08:06 PM
  #1  
E53DadWagon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2025
Posts: 549
Likes: 239
From: New York, NY
2026 E53 wagon
Motor Trend E53 Wagon test

https://www.motortrend.com/news/mercedes-e53-amg-wagon-2026-coty

Link

Last edited by E53DadWagon; Oct 14, 2025 at 08:26 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2025 | 01:42 PM
  #2  
GregTR's Avatar
Super Member
10 Year Member
Shutterbug
Community Builder
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 971
Likes: 182
From: DFW, TX
2014 E350 Wagon, 2025 GLC 350e, 2026 E53 Wagon
The E-class didn't win this time but I guess you can't win every year. The fact that the E53 wagon was a finalist is pretty good in my book. Side note: I got my son an Golf R 20th anniversary edition, the last of the 6-speed manuals, I guess I know how to pick them :-)
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2025 | 02:29 PM
  #3  
yossarian1's Avatar
Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2025
Posts: 159
Likes: 48
2026 E53 Wagon; 2011 G37 Convertible
Reading the "behind the scenes" article, the BMW M5 Touring got a bent wheel and was eliminated from the competition...whoops!!!
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2025 | 10:37 PM
  #4  
Mercuccio's Avatar
Senior Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2025
Posts: 444
Likes: 102
Here's a comparison of Motor Trend Test Results
  1. 2023/2025 Audi S6 Sedan: 0-60 4.5 seconds | 60-0 110 ft | roadholding 0.84 g | figure 8 lap 26.0 sec @ 0.74 g (avg)
  2. 2025 Mercedes E53 Sedan: 0-60 3.3 seconds | 60-0 102 ft | roadholding 0.93 g | figure 8 lap 24.1 sec @ 0.84 g (avg)
  3. 2026 Mercedes E53 Wagon: 0-60 3.5 seconds | 60-0 108 ft | roadholding 0.94 g | figure 8 lap 24.1 sec @ 0.83 g (avg)
  4. 2025 BMW M5 Touring: 0-60 3.2 seconds | 60-0 105 ft | roadholding 0.95 g | figure 8 lap 23.8 sec @ 0.88 g (avg)
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2025 | 10:42 AM
  #5  
db123456's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2025
Posts: 46
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by Mercuccio
Here's a comparison of Motor Trend Test Results
  1. 2023/2025 Audi S6 Sedan: 0-60 4.5 seconds | 60-0 110 ft | roadholding 0.84 g | figure 8 lap 26.0 sec @ 0.74 g (avg)
  2. 2025 Mercedes E53 Sedan: 0-60 3.3 seconds | 60-0 102 ft | roadholding 0.93 g | figure 8 lap 24.1 sec @ 0.84 g (avg)
  3. 2026 Mercedes E53 Wagon: 0-60 3.5 seconds | 60-0 108 ft | roadholding 0.94 g | figure 8 lap 24.1 sec @ 0.83 g (avg)
  4. 2025 BMW M5 Touring: 0-60 3.2 seconds | 60-0 105 ft | roadholding 0.95 g | figure 8 lap 23.8 sec @ 0.88 g (avg)
I’ve also been interested in Car and Driver’s 5-60 rolling start times. They have the M5 Touring at 3.4 seconds (vs. 3.1 seconds 0-60) and the E53 sedan at 4.1 seconds (vs. 3.3 0-60). I don’t think they’ve separately tested the E53 wagon.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2025 | 10:47 AM
  #6  
geektoad's Avatar
Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2025
Posts: 235
Likes: 124
From: NH
26 E53 Wagon
Originally Posted by db123456
I’ve also been interested in Car and Driver’s 5-60 rolling start times. They have the M5 Touring at 3.4 seconds (vs. 3.1 seconds 0-60) and the E53 sedan at 4.1 seconds (vs. 3.3 0-60). I don’t think they’ve separately tested the E53 wagon.
I can't speak to the BMW, but i would guess the E53 difference between 0-60 and 5-60 is that you can't engage launch control to get the extra power for the rolling start?
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2025 | 11:05 AM
  #7  
db123456's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2025
Posts: 46
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by geektoad
I can't speak to the BMW, but i would guess the E53 difference between 0-60 and 5-60 is that you can't engage launch control to get the extra power for the rolling start?
That must be part of it here, but in general Car and Driver will show a gap between the 0-60 time and the 5-60 that results from the way they launch the vehicles. For the 0-60 time, they’ll use launch control if available, or else brake torque so they can launch with the engine high up in its rev range (and in the boost in the case of modern turbo engines). They can’t do that with the 5-60 test; the car is rolling at 5 mph and they just hit the gas. The upshot is that the 0-60 time will generally be quicker even without a launch mode that unlocks extra HP. And 5-60 is (at least arguably) a better test of real-world performance.

Car and Driver also reports their 0-60 times net of one foot of rollout, which represents 0.3 seconds for both the M5 and E53.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2025 | 11:48 AM
  #8  
kjb55's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,513
Likes: 269
From: Chicago
2025 AMG E 53; 2018 GLC300 4Matic; 2003 360 Modena
Great results across the board. The drivetrain of the E is very impressive, especially when compared to the BMW V8 with more power. Well done MB.
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

New Mercedes-AMG SUVs Arrive With NEW V8 Engine: 12 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

8 Oddball Mercedes Ideas That Actually Made it to Production

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Dubai Tuner Gives the Mercedes G-Class An Entirely New Look

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Six Gift Ideas Your AMG Loving Dad or Grad Will Cherish

 
story-4

7 Craziest Things AMG Gas Ever Built

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Dec 4, 2025 | 12:16 PM
  #9  
yossarian1's Avatar
Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2025
Posts: 159
Likes: 48
2026 E53 Wagon; 2011 G37 Convertible
Those results definitely show me why the M5 touring is $30k (starting base) more than the E53 wagon...ha ha
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2025 | 01:11 PM
  #10  
GregTR's Avatar
Super Member
10 Year Member
Shutterbug
Community Builder
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 971
Likes: 182
From: DFW, TX
2014 E350 Wagon, 2025 GLC 350e, 2026 E53 Wagon
Originally Posted by yossarian1
Those results definitely show me why the M5 touring is $30k (starting base) more than the E53 wagon...ha ha
I drive an Audi RS e-tron GT. The pull is not worth the price... Sure it's fun but you'll only do it a few times. In 4 years of ownership I probably did a full pull/launch 100 times? At $30k that'd be $300 a pull. I get way more thrill out of my full motion sim rig if I want to be honest.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2025 | 01:53 PM
  #11  
E53DadWagon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2025
Posts: 549
Likes: 239
From: New York, NY
2026 E53 wagon
Originally Posted by GregTR
I drive an Audi RS e-tron GT. The pull is not worth the price... Sure it's fun but you'll only do it a few times. In 4 years of ownership I probably did a full pull/launch 100 times? At $30k that'd be $300 a pull. I get way more thrill out of my full motion sim rig if I want to be honest.
the problem with this price analysis is it does not take into account the residual value when you are done with the car.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2025 | 04:25 PM
  #12  
GregTR's Avatar
Super Member
10 Year Member
Shutterbug
Community Builder
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 971
Likes: 182
From: DFW, TX
2014 E350 Wagon, 2025 GLC 350e, 2026 E53 Wagon
Originally Posted by E53DadWagon
the problem with this price analysis is it does not take into account the residual value when you are done with the car.
That is fair. So we can compare the price drop of an M5 and an E53 over 4 years and only charge for the depreciated part of the $30k difference. The math may make it look better at only $150/pull vs $300 but it'll still be non-consequential to my argument's validity which kind of hinges on the rate of diminishing returns which gets more and more ridiculous the higher you go on the MSRP ladder.

Doug DeMuro kind of soured on these wagons as well:

To each their own, for me the biggest allure of the E53 is the EV range and the luxury and comfort of a Mercedes that no M5 can touch even if it's faster from 5 to 60.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2025 | 07:38 PM
  #13  
Alan Smithee's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,303
Likes: 408
^ ...and the M5 is very hard to look at, at least IMO.

Doug's take is interesting, considering he has had AMG wagons in the past, and the headline of his E450 AT purchase video was "I bought a new car, and it's very boring". Personally, I prefer not to drive boring cars.

Last edited by Alan Smithee; Dec 4, 2025 at 09:58 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2025 | 10:46 PM
  #14  
E53DadWagon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2025
Posts: 549
Likes: 239
From: New York, NY
2026 E53 wagon
Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
^ ...and the M5 is very hard to look at, at least IMO.

Doug's take is interesting, considering he has had AMG wagons in the past, and the headline of his E450 AT purchase video was "I bought a new car, and it's very boring". Personally, I prefer not to drive boring cars.
he also recently said the E53 wagon was a sweet spot and the others (bmw and Audi) were “too much”
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2025 | 11:59 PM
  #15  
Alan Smithee's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,303
Likes: 408
^ Just went back and watched the driving portion of his E53 sedan video. He raved about it and I lost track of how many times he said it was comfortable…and it was a First Edition the perf seats and 21s. Only complaint was tire noise.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2025 | 08:27 AM
  #16  
geektoad's Avatar
Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2025
Posts: 235
Likes: 124
From: NH
26 E53 Wagon
The wagon is really the perfect "compromise" for me. Very efficient most of the time, serious smile generation when needed, a fantastic, comfortable interior, and i can fit some stuff in it when needed. (My dogs are small...their carriers will fit! )
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2025 | 09:48 AM
  #17  
E53DadWagon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2025
Posts: 549
Likes: 239
From: New York, NY
2026 E53 wagon
Originally Posted by geektoad
The wagon is really the perfect "compromise" for me. Very efficient most of the time, serious smile generation when needed, a fantastic, comfortable interior, and i can fit some stuff in it when needed. (My dogs are small...their carriers will fit! )
thank you for cutting off the one dude who always complains about the loss of a few inches
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2025 | 02:32 PM
  #18  
Mercuccio's Avatar
Senior Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2025
Posts: 444
Likes: 102
Originally Posted by db123456
I’ve also been interested in Car and Driver’s 5-60 rolling start times. They have the M5 Touring at 3.4 seconds (vs. 3.1 seconds 0-60) and the E53 sedan at 4.1 seconds (vs. 3.3 0-60). I don’t think they’ve separately tested the E53 wagon.
Car and Driver's 5-60 acceleration test is a better indicator of how the car performs when we drive them. In the 0-60 test, Car and Driver will clutch dump. In a manual car, this is pressing the brake and clutch pedals, then revving the engine with the accelerator pedal followed by a quick engagement of the clutch (releasing the clutch pedal.) It is hard on the drivetrain and wears the clutch. People usually don't beat up their own cars that way, but it is the fastest way to go 0-60.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2025 | 02:40 PM
  #19  
Mercuccio's Avatar
Senior Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2025
Posts: 444
Likes: 102
Originally Posted by geektoad
I can't speak to the BMW, but i would guess the E53 difference between 0-60 and 5-60 is that you can't engage launch control to get the extra power for the rolling start?
Correct. Launch control is the difference. It gives an extra burst of power and is revving the engine to do something similar to a clutch dump but with the torque converter transmission. In a manual transmission car, the magazine testers will do runs at different RPMs to see how many RPMs lead to the quickest launch. In an automatic with launch control, the engineers will dial the best RPMs into the launch control program.

Reply
Old Dec 5, 2025 | 02:58 PM
  #20  
E53DadWagon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2025
Posts: 549
Likes: 239
From: New York, NY
2026 E53 wagon
Originally Posted by Mercuccio
Car and Driver's 5-60 acceleration test is a better indicator of how the car performs when we drive them. In the 0-60 test, Car and Driver will clutch dump. In a manual car, this is pressing the brake and clutch pedals, then revving the engine with the accelerator pedal followed by a quick engagement of the clutch (releasing the clutch pedal.) It is hard on the drivetrain and wears the clutch. People usually don't beat up their own cars that way, but it is the fastest way to go 0-60.
ok but in the case of the E53, it’s actually engineered to do this (launch from standstill) for you in a presumably safe way.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2025 | 03:02 PM
  #21  
Mercuccio's Avatar
Senior Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2025
Posts: 444
Likes: 102
In the 2025 E53 sedan review, Motor Trend said the E53 did 60-0 in 102 feet with mechanical brakes and 120 kW of regenerative braking. The prior generation E63 S sedan took 109 feet for 60-0.

Motor Trend attributed the short stopping distance to regenerative braking. Regenerative braking will help in the time when your right foot is going from the accelerator to pressing the brake pedal down, but I would guess that newer tire technology is helping the stopping distances more. Any braking system will allow you to lock the brakes. Once the brakes lock, the car takes longer to stop. The tires and weight of the car are the usual limiting factors in stopping distances. I am guessing that tires or improved ABS is allowing the heavier E53 to stop shorter than the E63 S. Whatever the reason for the short stopping distances on the E53, it is impressive.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2025 | 03:06 PM
  #22  
Mercuccio's Avatar
Senior Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2025
Posts: 444
Likes: 102
Originally Posted by E53DadWagon
ok but in the case of the E53, it’s actually engineered to do this (launch from standstill) for you in a presumably safe way.
It's safe for you. It's probably less safe for the car. The car is designed to handle launch control, but I wouldn't be doing it 10 times per day. Lol.

I think Nissan had to beef up the rear axles after launch control was breaking them in the GTR.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2025 | 03:09 PM
  #23  
db123456's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2025
Posts: 46
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by E53DadWagon
ok but in the case of the E53, it’s actually engineered to do this (launch from standstill) for you in a presumably safe way.
True, but in the real world how often to people actually engage launch control (or do a brake torqued launch so that the car is starting with the engine already revving and in the boost)? The 5-60 time has some value as a more realistic measure of acceleration in normal conditions.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2025 | 03:10 PM
  #24  
Mercuccio's Avatar
Senior Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2025
Posts: 444
Likes: 102
Originally Posted by E53DadWagon
ok but in the case of the E53, it’s actually engineered to do this (launch from standstill) for you in a presumably safe way.
The engineers have to decide, "Do we engineer launch control so it results in the fastest magazine review times, or do we dial it down so it is easier on the mechanical bits of the car?" The purpose of launch control is to launch, so they are probably going emphasize going fast without breaking anyting. It's in your car, so you have to try it!
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2025 | 03:32 PM
  #25  
Mercuccio's Avatar
Senior Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2025
Posts: 444
Likes: 102
Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
^ ...and the M5 is very hard to look at, at least IMO.

Doug's take is interesting, considering he has had AMG wagons in the past, and the headline of his E450 AT purchase video was "I bought a new car, and it's very boring". Personally, I prefer not to drive boring cars.
People will have different sweet spots between the E450, the E53 and the E63 if it existed. Over time, a person's sweet spot can change depending upon how they use the car and what other cars they own.

Mercedes tends to make the suspension stiffer in the AMGs. I find Audi's and BMW's use the adaptive suspension better in allowing for comfort while also having good body roll control. Mercedes-AMG could make the suspensions more comfortable, but they think their customers associate stiff suspensions with sportiness.

To me, the E63 is a performance car that can be driven daily. The E53 is a daily driver that has enhanced performance. The E450 is a comfortable luxury car that performs very well. The E350 is the same luxury car at a lower price and lower performance. Depending on your priorities, any of the E-class options might be your preference.

It would be interesting if Mercedes released an E55 with the E53 engine, a larger electric motor like in the C63 and a smaller battery. Due to the increased performance, the E55 might sell more than the E53, but for the E53's mission of a daily driver with enhanced performance the E53 drivetrain is a great choice.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:14 PM.

story-0
New Mercedes-AMG SUVs Arrive With NEW V8 Engine: 12 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes-AMG's updated GLE 63 S and GLS 63 bring a new-generation V8, subtle design revisions, and familiar supercar-rivaling performance figures.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-17 12:52:51


VIEW MORE
story-1
8 Oddball Mercedes Ideas That Actually Made it to Production

Slideshow: Mercedes has never been afraid to experiment, and some of its strangest ideas turned out to be surprisingly successful.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-10 17:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-2
Dubai Tuner Gives the Mercedes G-Class An Entirely New Look

Sideshow: A Middle Eastern tuner has transformed the Mercedes-AMG G 63 into an open-top special, replacing nearly every exterior panel in the process.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-10 15:29:50


VIEW MORE
story-3
Six Gift Ideas Your AMG Loving Dad or Grad Will Cherish

Slideshow: Six gift ideas your AMG loving dad or grad will cherish.

By | 2026-06-03 17:26:18


VIEW MORE
story-4
7 Craziest Things AMG Gas Ever Built

Slideshow: Sometimes AMG builds fast sedans. Other times, it builds twin-turbo V12 land missiles and six-wheeled off-road monsters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-26 17:59:58


VIEW MORE
story-5
New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes-AMG's new electric GT 4-Door Coupe trades combustion for software, synthetic noise, and more than 1,100 horsepower.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-20 20:08:15


VIEW MORE
story-6
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-7
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE