Motor Trend E53 Wagon test




- 2023/2025 Audi S6 Sedan: 0-60 4.5 seconds | 60-0 110 ft | roadholding 0.84 g | figure 8 lap 26.0 sec @ 0.74 g (avg)
- 2025 Mercedes E53 Sedan: 0-60 3.3 seconds | 60-0 102 ft | roadholding 0.93 g | figure 8 lap 24.1 sec @ 0.84 g (avg)
- 2026 Mercedes E53 Wagon: 0-60 3.5 seconds | 60-0 108 ft | roadholding 0.94 g | figure 8 lap 24.1 sec @ 0.83 g (avg)
- 2025 BMW M5 Touring: 0-60 3.2 seconds | 60-0 105 ft | roadholding 0.95 g | figure 8 lap 23.8 sec @ 0.88 g (avg)
- 2023/2025 Audi S6 Sedan: 0-60 4.5 seconds | 60-0 110 ft | roadholding 0.84 g | figure 8 lap 26.0 sec @ 0.74 g (avg)
- 2025 Mercedes E53 Sedan: 0-60 3.3 seconds | 60-0 102 ft | roadholding 0.93 g | figure 8 lap 24.1 sec @ 0.84 g (avg)
- 2026 Mercedes E53 Wagon: 0-60 3.5 seconds | 60-0 108 ft | roadholding 0.94 g | figure 8 lap 24.1 sec @ 0.83 g (avg)
- 2025 BMW M5 Touring: 0-60 3.2 seconds | 60-0 105 ft | roadholding 0.95 g | figure 8 lap 23.8 sec @ 0.88 g (avg)
Car and Driver also reports their 0-60 times net of one foot of rollout, which represents 0.3 seconds for both the M5 and E53.
Trending Topics




The Best of Mercedes & AMG












Doug DeMuro kind of soured on these wagons as well:
To each their own, for me the biggest allure of the E53 is the EV range and the luxury and comfort of a Mercedes that no M5 can touch even if it's faster from 5 to 60.
Doug's take is interesting, considering he has had AMG wagons in the past, and the headline of his E450 AT purchase video was "I bought a new car, and it's very boring". Personally, I prefer not to drive boring cars.
Last edited by Alan Smithee; Dec 4, 2025 at 09:58 PM.




Doug's take is interesting, considering he has had AMG wagons in the past, and the headline of his E450 AT purchase video was "I bought a new car, and it's very boring". Personally, I prefer not to drive boring cars.
)








Motor Trend attributed the short stopping distance to regenerative braking. Regenerative braking will help in the time when your right foot is going from the accelerator to pressing the brake pedal down, but I would guess that newer tire technology is helping the stopping distances more. Any braking system will allow you to lock the brakes. Once the brakes lock, the car takes longer to stop. The tires and weight of the car are the usual limiting factors in stopping distances. I am guessing that tires or improved ABS is allowing the heavier E53 to stop shorter than the E63 S. Whatever the reason for the short stopping distances on the E53, it is impressive.
I think Nissan had to beef up the rear axles after launch control was breaking them in the GTR.
Doug's take is interesting, considering he has had AMG wagons in the past, and the headline of his E450 AT purchase video was "I bought a new car, and it's very boring". Personally, I prefer not to drive boring cars.
Mercedes tends to make the suspension stiffer in the AMGs. I find Audi's and BMW's use the adaptive suspension better in allowing for comfort while also having good body roll control. Mercedes-AMG could make the suspensions more comfortable, but they think their customers associate stiff suspensions with sportiness.
To me, the E63 is a performance car that can be driven daily. The E53 is a daily driver that has enhanced performance. The E450 is a comfortable luxury car that performs very well. The E350 is the same luxury car at a lower price and lower performance. Depending on your priorities, any of the E-class options might be your preference.
It would be interesting if Mercedes released an E55 with the E53 engine, a larger electric motor like in the C63 and a smaller battery. Due to the increased performance, the E55 might sell more than the E53, but for the E53's mission of a daily driver with enhanced performance the E53 drivetrain is a great choice.



