Charging > 80% on a '24 lease EQB300
Since we are leasing it, and likely not going to buy it at the end of the lease, I am wondering if it makes more sense to just charge it routinely to 90 or 100%. I would appreciate any input from the forum.
If we were going to purchase it at lease end, I would just continue to treat it as if we were planning on keeping it for a long time, however that approach doesn't make sense to us given the pace of battery range improvements both near and longer term. It appears that we may end up with a GLC-electric (or whatever clumsy name they come up with when it arrives in the US) in 20 months when our lease is up. We have just one car as we are retired, and most of our driving is local or on day trips.
Thanks in advance for any comments.
Last edited by tenordrum; Nov 4, 2025 at 10:33 AM.
So....we also leased our EQB and started off only charging to 80% for the above reasons, but during the depths of winter in Minnesota the range drops off a cliff so we routinely charge to 100% seasonly. We have not given it a second thought given the ambient temperatures and only charging at home. We still charge to 80% the rest of the year, just because that’s good enough for us.
IMHO, if you have no plans to buy the EQB, just go ahead and charge as needed for your purposes. Battery health could be a factor in resale value, but it’s not your problem and battery health can be determined by a future buyer.
Last edited by cadetdrivr; Nov 4, 2025 at 10:59 AM.
One of the other reasons not to charge above 80% is the extra time required as the charge rate falls off a cliff around 80% charge.
One of the other reasons not to charge above 80% is the extra time required as the charge rate falls off a cliff around 80% charge.




Trending Topics
Already looking ahead to June '27 when the lease is up and getting another model with better range. If I had my way it would be a CPO 2024 or 2025 EQS model, yet my spouse likes the smaller size of the EQB, so it might be the new GLC EV model. She liked the size of the GLC 300. I miss my ML250 and its range ;-)
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
When I first got my EV I was concerned about range, but as I used the car, which I drive significantly farther than you do each month, I found that charging once or twice a week was not a problem. I only charge to 80% and found a charging location that allowed me to do some shopping and other tasks at the same time as I was charging. In fact, I frequently found I had to rush because the car finished charging before I was done with my tasks. I had to hurry to avoid idle fees - charging did not cost anything as I had free charging for two years.
Since you use less than 12% of the car's range a day and can charge every day at home at level 1 (or possibly level 2 if you have a handy dryer socket), or once a week at level 3, you will never need the small additional distance you get when charging to 100%. You are doubling your charge time to get perhaps 50 miles of additional range. Not worth it.
The hardest thing for me to learn was that I did not need to charge to 80% every time I charged; I was so used to filling the gas tank to full in my ICE cars that I did not think about what I really needed with the EV and the two years free charging. The free charging is based on a timed session, not the energy put into the battery. If I exceeded the time, then I paid a hefty fee (64¢/kWh) for the remaining energy to go to 80%. It was better for me to stop charging at the session time limit no matter the charge level than to keep charging to 80% and pay a fee. I might need to charge again one day earlier, but since I went near the charge station every day, it didn't matter.
Once the free charging ended, the picture was slightly different. It is far less expensive to charge at home every night than to charge at a DCFC station. I could have used the 120V outlets in my garage (using the dryer outlet was not an option due to the layout of the house) and an occasional DCFC, but since adding a 50A circuit and level 2 EVSE was trivial I went that route. Now, the car is charged to 80% every morning - I needed the level 2 circuit as I drive more than you do per day on average, so would have needed more than eight hours on a level 1 EVSE.
We installed an Emporia charger at home (heavily incentivized by the utility) and we are using up the $1K MB charging allowance. The MB wall charger was apparently heavily backordered when we leased the car, per the dealer, so it worked out for us to have the dual option of home charging and the $1K allowance. By charging to 100% rather than 80%, I will just go less frequently to the EA chargers. So that will be worth it to me. At home, yeah, it doesn't matter that much, and the Emporia charger is great.
Since we are leasing it, and likely not going to buy it at the end of the lease, I am wondering if it makes more sense to just charge it routinely to 90 or 100%. I would appreciate any input from the forum.
If we were going to purchase it at lease end, I would just continue to treat it as if we were planning on keeping it for a long time, however that approach doesn't make sense to us given the pace of battery range improvements both near and longer term. It appears that we may end up with a GLC-electric (or whatever clumsy name they come up with when it arrives in the US) in 20 months when our lease is up. We have just one car as we are retired, and most of our driving is local or on day trips.
Thanks in advance for any comments.
Charge to 100 as you're not keeping it. Also with the recall, you're probably not charging to 100 every time as they reduced the maximum.
With mine we charged to 100 every week and drive till under 10%.




