Safety Issues with Regenerative Braking
I noticed that there were several incidents in which I saw people braking and swerving to the left or right behind me. I had on strong regen, and I thought, "Are people just memorized by the awesomeness of the rear end of my EQS that they forget to brake? Kidding aside, I decide to research and found several articles like this:
https://www.carscoops.com/2023/06/hy...ative-braking/
and this
https://www.consumerreports.org/cars...s-a9533519285/
Sure thing, when I let off the accelerator pedal with strong regen. there's no brake lights until about the low teens mph. So heads up guys/gals, don't use strong regen unless you are in heavy stop and go traffic. Use normal or intel regenerative braking.
On another note about Intelligent regenerative braking, I don't know what is the detection distances limit of the system in mode. It's safe to say that it CANNOT see as far as your eyes can see. Therefore, even with Intelligent regen., you HAVE to brake first unless the car in front has been there only a car lengths ahead for some time. If a stationary car is 1000ft away and you barrowing 60 mph at it, do not expect the intelligent regen. to slow you down. I'm still looking to see if there's any technical document on the limit of distance detection. I suspect that it is only about as far as the adaptive cruise detection.
I noticed that there were several incidents in which I saw people braking and swerving to the left or right behind me. I had on strong regen, and I thought, "Are people just memorized by the awesomeness of the rear end of my EQS that they forget to brake? Kidding aside, I decide to research and found several articles like this:
https://www.carscoops.com/2023/06/hy...ative-braking/
and this
https://www.consumerreports.org/cars...s-a9533519285/
Sure thing, when I let off the accelerator pedal with strong regen. there's no brake lights until about the low teens mph. So heads up guys/gals, don't use strong regen unless you are in heavy stop and go traffic. Use normal or intel regenerative braking.
On another note about Intelligent regenerative braking, I don't know what is the detection distances limit of the system in mode. It's safe to say that it CANNOT see as far as your eyes can see. Therefore, even with Intelligent regen., you HAVE to brake first unless the car in front has been there only a car lengths ahead for some time. If a stationary car is 1000ft away and you barrowing 60 mph at it, do not expect the intelligent regen. to slow you down. I'm still looking to see if there's any technical document on the limit of distance detection. I suspect that it is only about as far as the adaptive cruise detection.
The brake light operation can be seen using the Assistance mode of the drivers display. At one point when regen is braking the brake light comes on then as the vehicle stops it goes off for between 10 to 20 seconds. This may meet regulations but is very dangerous. Yes, it could easily, and should be, addressed by a software change.
https://www.nhtsa.gov/report-a-safet...le-information
I noticed that there were several incidents in which I saw people braking and swerving to the left or right behind me. I had on strong regen, and I thought, "Are people just memorized by the awesomeness of the rear end of my EQS that they forget to brake? Kidding aside, I decide to research and found several articles like this:
https://www.carscoops.com/2023/06/hy...ative-braking/
and this
https://www.consumerreports.org/cars...s-a9533519285/
Sure thing, when I let off the accelerator pedal with strong regen. there's no brake lights until about the low teens mph. So heads up guys/gals, don't use strong regen unless you are in heavy stop and go traffic. Use normal or intel regenerative braking.
On another note about Intelligent regenerative braking, I don't know what is the detection distances limit of the system in mode. It's safe to say that it CANNOT see as far as your eyes can see. Therefore, even with Intelligent regen., you HAVE to brake first unless the car in front has been there only a car lengths ahead for some time. If a stationary car is 1000ft away and you barrowing 60 mph at it, do not expect the intelligent regen. to slow you down. I'm still looking to see if there's any technical document on the limit of distance detection. I suspect that it is only about as far as the adaptive cruise detection.
You guys should refrain from posting false information. Those articles are about HYUNDAI.
Please for the love of god, do not equate a Mercedes to a freaking Hyundai/Kia.
Mercedes brake lights with regen work just fine. I assure you that people swerving around you is due to your bad driving or theirs.
Mercedes brakes lights operate by the brake pedal or a sensor that detects the rate of deceleration. (Normal regen is not enough and Strong regen is more than enough.)
This is the ONLY problem with MB implementation. Once the vehicle stops and is no longer decelerating,
If your foot is not on the brake pedal the brake lights will turn off until the car automatically applies the physical brakes after a few seconds.
We have discussed this here before and there is a video that clearly explains this. https://mbworld.org/forums/eqs/86665...uperation.html
See post 11 for how MB brake lights work.
When it comes to safety… Do not post false information as fact!
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
All other aspects of this display, like left/right proximity sensor, simulated vehicles on either side, etc. all seem to be accurate. This leads me to believe that the brake light display is also correct.
I have no reason to provide false information, and would frankly like to hear that the assistance display is incorrect. The YouTube video, post #11, in the other thread explicitly describes what is should in the Assistance mode driver display.
I was driving about 55 mph on the freeway (traffic somewhat congested) with strong regen. A car was following me about 1 to 1.5 car length. I noticed an almost complete stop again. So I reacted with releasing the accelerator pedal, and the strong regen kicked in. After a quick realization that I still have room in the front, I lightly press on the accelerator pedal to cancel the strong regen. Within this 1 to 1.5 seconds saga, the car decelerated about 10 mph and I would estimate that the driver behind me only saw a tap of my brake light due to the delayed brake lights of the strong regen. To make the case worse, the driver may or may not have seen the split second brake light, but a huge decrease in speed was achieved due from the strong regen. and me light pedal the accelerator.
This type of incident happened to me 2 times within 2 days. I jokingly chalked it up to the mesmerizing rear end of an EQS. Perhaps it was some of that and some of it due to the delayed brake lights coming on in strong regen. Either way, I think if strong regen. is to be used, the brake light should come on IMMEDIATELY as soon as regen kick in. This is probably another reason why (aside from efficiency) we shouldn't use strong regen. in the EQS on the freeway.
All other aspects of this display, like left/right proximity sensor, simulated vehicles on either side, etc. all seem to be accurate. This leads me to believe that the brake light display is also correct.
I have no reason to provide false information, and would frankly like to hear that the assistance display is incorrect. The YouTube video, post #11, in the other thread explicitly describes what is should in the Assistance mode driver display.
Last edited by MB37; Nov 12, 2023 at 08:32 PM.
This turning off of the brake lights for a short time also happens when the car is stopped when using DISTRONIC.
The brake lights come on IMMEDIATELY after I take my foot off the go pedal.
Last edited by Tjdehya; Nov 13, 2023 at 09:42 AM.
Your video clearly shows the brake lights turning off just before the car comes to a complete stop, and seconds after coming back on. That is the issue!!!!! It should stay on.
It is my recollection, but I could be wrong, that in some situations the brake light does not come on immediately after lifting off the accelerator, but very shortly after. I really don't care if this is immediate or a couple of seconds later as it is not a safety issue unlike the first item. I previously said that it should and if it does then that is great. Will test this later today and post my experiences.
As mentioned several times before, it’s based on deceleration. Once the vehicle stops decelerating, if the foot is not on the brake pedal, the lights will turn off.
The brake lights come on IMMEDIATELY after I take my foot off the go pedal.
https://youtu.be/3W4UFWFXjyo?feature=shared
Lol, this guy busts out a drone in follow-mode hah. This forum is awesome. It looks like upon deceleration (with regeneration) the brake lights activate as we would all want/expect.
But, I also see something I wasn't expecting... which is once the car comes to a halt... then brake lights actually stop illuminating even though the vehicle is stationary. But at the 50-seconds mark, the brake lights turn back on while the vehicle is stationary. Is this because you purposely stepped on the brake pedal at the 50 second mark?
I guess this is one of the things where Tesla seems to have set a precedent that has become the norm even if its not intuitive. Tesla (and their proponents) swoon over the one pedal driving. This means an operator who lifts off the accelerator will cause the vehicle to begin slowing down (through regeneration) and the brake lights turn on. And also, once the vehicle comes to rest, Teslas will activate disc brakes to hold the vehicle stationary. This activation of the brake booster will cause the brake lights to remain illuminated once the vehicle is at rest, even if the brake pedal is not depressed.
However, Mercedes does not tout a "one pedal" driving mode. So, what I think Mercedes does is use regeneration to bring the vehicle to a halt, but then expect the operator to step on the brake pedal to activate the disc brakes and the brake lights. I can see why some people may feel this is an issue, since the Tesla status quo is that a strong regeneration/recuperation driving experience is now "one pedal" where touching the brake isn't necessary. Personally, since our previous two vehicles were Teslas, I habitually do not touch the brake pedal when I'm in Strong Recuperation and the vehicle is stationary. I can see this as a possible safety concern since now my brake lights aren't illuminated even if the vehicle is at rest.
Last edited by holeydonut; Nov 13, 2023 at 01:54 PM.
But, I also see something I wasn't expecting... which is once the car comes to a halt... then brake lights actually stop illuminating even though the vehicle is stationary. But at the 50-seconds mark, the brake lights turn back on while the vehicle is stationary. Is this because you purposely stepped on the brake pedal at the 50 second mark?
I guess this is one of the things where Tesla seems to have set a precedent that has become the norm even if its not intuitive. Tesla (and their proponents) swoon over the one pedal driving. This means an operator who lifts off the accelerator will cause the vehicle to begin slowing down (through regeneration) and the brake lights turn on. And also, once the vehicle comes to rest, Teslas will activate disc brakes to hold the vehicle stationary. This activation of the brake booster will cause the brake lights to remain illuminated once the vehicle is at rest, even if the brake pedal is not depressed.
However, Mercedes does not tout a "one pedal" driving mode. So, what I think Mercedes does is use regeneration to bring the vehicle to a halt, but then expect the operator to step on the brake pedal to activate the disc brakes and the brake lights. I can see why some people may feel this is an issue, since the Tesla status quo is that a strong regeneration/recuperation driving experience is now "one pedal" where touching the brake isn't necessary. Personally, since our previous two vehicles were Teslas, I habitually do not touch the brake pedal when I'm in Strong Recuperation and the vehicle is stationary. I can see this as a possible safety concern since now my brake lights aren't illuminated even if the vehicle is at rest.



I guess I'm lucky this is my first EV in a way as I have no clue what real one pedal driving is like so that hasn't been an issue for me.
ICE cars creep forward if the vehicle is in gear. So operators of ICE will hit the brakes to hold the vehicle at a standstill. Even people who put a ICE car in neutral, clutch in, or park at a red light will usually have their foot on the brake as well.
The Mercedes EQ holding steady without the brake lights being illuminated is a more recent thing. Personally I am surprised the EQ doesn't just activate the hydraulic brake booster when the vehicle is at rest and no pedal is depressed. Would solve for all scenarios one way or another.
But maybe the concern is that by default the EQ settings enable a forward creep; so Mercedes assumes the EV operator is driving the vehicle like ICE? I turn off forward creep in the EQS via settings and BMW i4 via the gear selector. And I just naturally assumed the vehicle applied the brake lights when stationary because I was used to what Tesla does.
I did some tests with my EQE SUV. Maybe it operates differently from the EQS, but I am not wrong about what I recall happening and what is displayed in the Assistance mode on my car.
1. The brake light comes on about 1 second after completely lifting off of the accelerator pedal, either at low speed of high speed.
2. I can crawl in traffic, lift off the accelerator pedal for a short while and then gently pressing it again and the brake light never comes on.
Neither of these two operations bother me. Is the operation in the EQS really different to the EQE? I really don't care.
What does bother me is the other situation that has been hotly discussed and we all seem to be in agreement about.
You guys should refrain from posting false information. Those articles are about HYUNDAI.
Please for the love of god, do not equate a Mercedes to a freaking Hyundai/Kia.
Mercedes brake lights with regen work just fine. I assure you that people swerving around you is due to your bad driving or theirs.
Mercedes brakes lights operate by the brake pedal or a sensor that detects the rate of deceleration. (Normal regen is not enough and Strong regen is more than enough.)
This is the ONLY problem with MB implementation. Once the vehicle stops and is no longer decelerating,
If your foot is not on the brake pedal the brake lights will turn off until the car automatically applies the physical brakes after a few seconds.
We have discussed this here before and there is a video that clearly explains this. https://mbworld.org/forums/eqs/86665...uperation.html
See post 11 for how MB brake lights work.
When it comes to safety… Do not post false information as fact!
I, too, have done testing on my EQS AMG. I picked an empty road, set my HUD to power, the driver display to assistance display, and the center console to the IWC stop watch. In strong regen, I drove 55 mph. I released the accelerator pedal at the same time I press the start button on the IWC. As soon as the brake light came on in the assist display, I press the stop button. On 3+ trials, I got a time delay of 1.64, 1.87, and 1.76 seconds and etc.. Nothing under 1.5 seconds. My fingers was no more than a few centimeters from the button. Even if you account for my delay reaction, which is .07 to .14 of a second, the brake lights are delayed on average 1.5+ seconds AFTER the release of the accelerator pedal (which is the immediate start of the strong regen.) to the time the brake lights come on. The assumption is that a strong regen produces -.15g.
In that 1.5 seconds timeframe, the car behind you has travelled 120 feet (55mph) before it sees the brake lights come on. Fortunately, your 55 mph has slowed to a 50 mph when the brake lights comes on. That puts a closer gap of 11 ft before the person behind sees your brake lights. Below is the calculation, but because I'm not a physicist by trade or mathematician, please check my calculation.
55 mph = 80.66 ft/sec
50 mph = 73.33 ft/sec
5 mph delta =7.33 ft/sec; *1.5 = 10.995 ft travelled
Using an online linear motion calculator, a -.15g deceleration for 1.5 seconds at 55 mph will result in 50.1 or 50 mph (assuming that a strong regen produce a .-15g deceleration.).
If you want to test this for yourself, have a blind test with a friend following you at 55 mph at about 1.5 car length and post a video of his/her reaction. I'm interested to know.








