You All Bought A Re-labeled Korean Car!!!
of course the 2 cars are not identical and the exterior parts are not interchangable. That would be ridiculous......Now if some of you have lived outside the US, I'm sure you're aware that there are different cars in other countries, and even the same car with different names and so on. In Korea, for example, all lines of Nissans from the altima...maxima...and so on are rebranded Samsung SM3, SM5, SM7. They are the same exact cars as the Nissans with different body lines/bumpers/window sizes.
Obviously these SM3 - SM7's can't be exported out of Korea for resale, just like the Rexton wasn't allowed until it dropped the Benz engine and other major parts.
Even my Rexton's cabin looks similar to my CLK's. From the memory seat functions, to the tip-tronic shifter, as well as some of the other fucntions...BAS/rain sensing wipers.....etc
Last edited by TresX; Aug 24, 2006 at 03:42 PM.
OK, so the article mentions use of a Mercedes diesel engine and transmission, and some components. HOWEVER that does not mean it's simply a rebadged ML/GL/R. Way to go on exaggerating things.
OK, so the article mentions use of a Mercedes diesel engine and transmission, and some components. HOWEVER that does not mean it's simply a rebadged ML/GL/R. Way to go on exaggerating things.
Kudos on your due dilligence sir......
I will concede that the GL is not a simply re-badged Rexton, but it certainly is a suped-up Rexton.
I will concede that the GL is not a simply re-badged Rexton, but it certainly is a suped-up Rexton.
Last edited by AsianML; Aug 24, 2006 at 05:12 PM.
Granted they changed the body a bit, but basically the same car. Compare for yourself.
Don't get me wrong....with the Navi, I paid close to $40k for the car. I guess $15k for the star isn't too bad!

The Best of Mercedes & AMG
and the retarded looking ssang thing. To my discust, I think I see what he's talking about. With exception of some wacky restyling, I can almost visualize it. Also, the seats, dash, and steering wheel(except the horn pad) look a little benz to me. I hope I am wrong, and although I've never been a big fan of the ML, it goes against my "wish everything was purebread" mentality. I still do not see a gl in that thing though.
now, if this is true, and I had the knowledge of it, I would probably introduce the topic a little more diplomatically (as it is an MB forum for MB enthusiasts)so as not to be considered a "troll". my
.02
I still want MORE proof though, as pictures can be decieving.
and the retarded looking ssang thing. To my discust, I think I see what he's talking about. With exception of some wacky restyling, I can almost visualize it. Also, the seats, dash, and steering wheel(except the horn pad) look a little benz to me. I hope I am wrong, and although I've never been a big fan of the ML, it goes against my "wish everything was purebread" mentality. I still do not see a gl in that thing though.
now, if this is true, and I had the knowledge of it, I would probably introduce the topic a little more diplomatically (as it is an MB forum for MB enthusiasts)so as not to be considered a "troll". my
.02
I still want MORE proof though, as pictures can be decieving.
EDIT/ADD: The article from Yahoo UK also states that some of the interior bits came from VW.
Last edited by AsianML; Aug 24, 2006 at 08:05 PM.
again i say, the rexton has absolutely nothing to do with the gl. and thats a fact.
P.S. See for yourself....don't just deny....
http://www.smotor.com/en/showroom/rexton/interior.jsp
compare the interior and other attributes and make a decision for yourself. I can only show you the door...grassshopper!
Last edited by TresX; Aug 24, 2006 at 08:47 PM.
P.S. See for yourself....don't just deny....
http://www.smotor.com/en/showroom/rexton/interior.jsp
compare the interior and other attributes and make a decision for yourself. I can only show you the door...grassshopper!

ANYWAY, the rexton was introduced in 2001 as a mid size suv and did not use a mercedes engine and has absolutely nothing to do with or related in anyway to the GL.
M
ML ........REXTON........GL
If you read the first article I posted, it mentions a relationship with the M class.
How much you wanna bet on the use of Mercedes engines?
M
Last edited by TresX; Aug 25, 2006 at 08:13 AM.


It was okay that you found some similarities between the two vehicles (even though most were visual similarities), but just flat out saying that it's a rebadged GL? Absolutely ridiculous. You try to compare the Rexton to the GL solely on looks, and then you try to push the idea on us without any solid evidence.
You were already proven wrong when I said the only similarities between the two are LICENSED diesel engine from the ML and Jeep, a few interior switches, shifters.....oh and they got some of that stuff from Volkswagen as well. BUT, the main thing that proved you wrong was that the Rexton is a ladder-framed chassis whereas the GL/ML are unibody.
MOST.POINTLESS.THREAD.EVER. (ok, maybe there's been worse)
just about everyone knows ssangyong got a big helping hand from Merc. it's not just the Rexton - their Chairman shares the W124 E-classes' chasis, transmission, engines, and previous versions were almost indistinguishable from the W140.
but cause and effect are really getting confused here, lol.



