GLC 350d
The sensible part of me really wanted to like the diesel options but I just couldn't live with such an underpowered vehicle. Hence I went to for the mad mans option and got a petrol GLC 43 AMG.
But when I ordered last month I did say that if the 350d was available the choice would be much harder as that is such a fantastic engine.
Part of me is glad it wasn't out at the time as I would have never been tempted to go down the AMG route, but the other part of me is sad as it would be a great economical choice.
Anyway future GLC owners win, as there are now finally to great engines available which the car really needed.
Given that (in the UK at least) the prices are very close, I am very happy with petrol (don't really like diesel anyway) and the extra hundred horses.
Every way I measure it - vs 350d,vs Macan/F-Pace amd vs US and German prices - I think the GLC 43 in the UK (with a c. 10% discount) is a bit of a bargain and surprised there isn't a £10k premium to the 350d.
On the economy point, I think it is overrated by both media and public. In real life driving the official numbers tend to be closer (I replaced a diesel X5 with a 4.8iS) and the major cost of any new car is depreciation compared to which 5 -10 mpg is not hugely significant unless your mileages are big.
Looking forward to mine turning up!
I did not test drive the 220d, but did the 250d 4 cylinder twin turbo 204Hp and 500Nm. I really did not like that, I didn't feel secure powerful enough overtaking on the small UK roads and when flooring it it is just an underwhelming sensation. The Porsche Mac just blows it away against those models, as does the Jaguar F Pace. So for the UK market I think it is very good they have now introduced a 3.0 twin turbo diesel to go along side the AMG Petrol model.
Regarding "GLC 43 in the UK (with a c. 10% discount)" - just heard that MB have verboten discounting since last month on the GLC as there is under-supply here

Max
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG






