Way to go Mercedes!
Most of you will be happy to know that the new GLC, has been included in Consumer Reports 2017 10 most reliable cars list. That's a HUGE deal. Keep kicking butt MB! The GLK did remarkably well too.
|
Wow that is a very good rapport card :)
|
Originally Posted by dejongj
(Post 6951143)
Wow that is a very good rapport card :)
At the same time, I'm surprised that it did well because the C class, (which is practically the same car), had a rough release. But that came from the Alabama plant. |
Also the only Mercedes to make it to the top 10.
|
Considering the C class is similar in design and shares many components with the GLC, the rankings highlight the disparity in manufacturing quality between the Bremen and Alabama.
|
Originally Posted by chillysyrup
(Post 6952863)
Considering the C class is similar in design and shares many components with the GLC, the rankings highlight the disparity in manufacturing quality between the Bremen and Alabama.
Clearly there is bias and ignorance when it comes to people that review cars. One should realize that MOST of the people that review cars are journalists first, and "car people" second. Reviewing and rating cars is there job, not their obligation. My W204 is a solid car and IMO the competition it had was garbage. With that being said, the W205 is absolutely light years ahead, whilst the competition has only become worse. Sorry for the rant lol. My advise: Go drive the car on your own, and form your own opinion. |
Originally Posted by ec_nova
(Post 6952891)
they don't MANUFACTURE them in the plants, they ASSEMBLE them. So no, it doesn't highlight that at all. What it does highlight is how you should take reviews with a grain of salt. They are essentially the same vehicles, yet with vastly different "ratings"
Clearly there is bias and ignorance when it comes to people that review cars. One should realize that MOST of the people that review cars are journalists first, and "car people" second. Reviewing and rating cars is there job, not their obligation. My W204 is a solid car and IMO the competition it had was garbage. With that being said, the W205 is absolutely light years ahead, whilst the competition has only become worse. Sorry for the rant lol. My advise: Go drive the car on your own, and form your own opinion. |
To move this thread in a different direction, I want to report that my GLC, which I took delivery of on 10/7 and drove almost 5,000 miles on a just completed trip, had no issues: no chattering wipers or squealing brakes, no glass distortion, nothing to concern me. (I accepted the dealer's explanation that two "unprompted" wiper sweeps were generated by dust or some such on the windshield.) The trip involved a large amount of highway driving, much of it in Texas and NM, and with four adults in the car (and lots of luggage) my milage averaged about 27.5 mpg. My conclusion: Way to go, Mercedes!
|
Originally Posted by jimbobboy
(Post 6956977)
To move this thread in a different direction, I want to report that my GLC, which I took delivery of on 10/7 and drove almost 5,000 miles on a just completed trip, had no issues: no chattering wipers or squealing brakes, no glass distortion, nothing to concern me. (I accepted the dealer's explanation that two "unprompted" wiper sweeps were generated by dust or some such on the windshield.) The trip involved a large amount of highway driving, much of it in Texas and NM, and with four adults in the car (and lots of luggage) my milage averaged about 27.5 mpg. My conclusion: Way to go, Mercedes!
|
Originally Posted by ec_nova
(Post 6957169)
The wipers are not meant to be left in the auto position when it is not raining. The shade from trees can trick the sensor into wiping when there is no rain, which can cause the blades to scratch the glass if there are contaminants. Just a little FYI. Glad you're happy with your car!
|
And this is with cars like the Lexus NX, Acura RDX, and Infiniti QX50 in consideration. The GLC had best in class dependability for the first model year! I had a feeling it was going to do fantastic. If only the C class had that graceful of a lauch. Damn you Vance, Alabama!!!
|
Originally Posted by chillysyrup
(Post 6952863)
Considering the C class is similar in design and shares many components with the GLC, the rankings highlight the disparity in manufacturing quality between the Bremen and Alabama.
M |
Originally Posted by Germancar1
(Post 6958572)
Well that, but more importantly MB has had time to work out the bugs also.
M |
Originally Posted by TSchuettinger
(Post 6958666)
Even so, Vance has never been that great.
M |
Originally Posted by TSchuettinger
(Post 6958666)
Even so, Vance has never been that great.
|
Originally Posted by schroedinger
(Post 6966064)
I had 3 MLs (2 350s and 1 550) and all were excellent quality -- as good, if not better, than my E320, E350, and CLK320.
|
Originally Posted by Germancar1
(Post 6958774)
They haven't been that bad either. The C was a brand new car in a brand new plant. Very hard for any automaker to pull off and even still the issues were more with fit and finish, not mechanical which would have been engineering not the manufacturing process. Vance has been putting their SUVs together for years and years now.
M |
Originally Posted by mikbar2
(Post 6972107)
They bought our C back because the collision avoidance would arbitrarily come on for no reason and reduce power. Upteen trips to the dealer and they bought it back. Less than a year old. That isn't fit and finish. Our GLC has been flawless.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:57 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands