Anyone considering GLC vs. F-Pace?

Yes, and I need to get my head checked
for considering Alfa-Romeo and Maserati
To be fair all the issues I have had with the Discovery sport have been minor and leather apart have been dealt with well, reason I am not buying again is that there are a lot of owners with more serious issues and I didn't want to take a chance. I know it sounds stupid when I am chancing a 43 but lifes full of chances, will know shortly whether it is a stupid decision or not.
I have not experienced any tire skip with my glc43. Be advised that any vehicle running summer tires in cold weather is going to be susceptible to tire skip as well as other undesirable behaviors. The vast majority of the time this has nothing to do with the vehicle itself.
I have not experienced any tire skip with my glc43. Be advised that any vehicle running summer tires in cold weather is going to be susceptible to tire skip as well as other undesirable behaviors. The vast majority of the time this has nothing to do with the vehicle itself.
This is nothing like the little usual occasional skip at all. But for the sake of the comparison lets not derail this thread, but feel free to join the one that is dedicated to it.

The Best of Mercedes & AMG



I went with MB over the F-Pace because fit/finish & MB dealer is 4 miles away vs 25 miles.


Oh, and even without such crap dealership experience, the pathetically low rear headroom killed the notion of buying one for me, and I'm not even that tall.
The same cramp-ness as the Macan, but with crappier reliability. Ha..no.
Last edited by speed12sil; Feb 15, 2017 at 08:06 PM. Reason: Changed to eliminate contention
Last edited by mleun481; Feb 15, 2017 at 06:45 PM.
Oh, and even without such crap dealership experience, the pathetically low rear headroom killed the notion of buying one for me, and I'm not even that tall.
The same cramp-ness as the Macan, but with crappier reliability. Ha..no.


So I went and test drove a 3 litre petrol F-pace. Yes, the inside isn't quite as nice(but still excellent), and of course, one still has some concerns about quality, although it's clear from the forums that a lot of this has been fixed now that it's nearly a year old. However, I did cancel my GLC order, and ordered the Jag instead because, whilst the two are similarly powerful, the handling on that Jag is different class - it is seriously seriously good and put a huge smile on my face (as did the noise of the engine under heavy acceleration. I test drove the Macan as well, and frankly, I preferred the Jag. Coming from a BMW M4, it was clear that the Jag would still keep me happy
. I might add that it was a cold day, and the car was on 22" wheels, and try as I might, I couldn't get it to crab or judder!Also, let's face it, it's the sweetest looking SUV out there - an absolute babe! And actually, thinking about the inside, I actually prefer the integral screen rather than the 'perched' ipad look-alike in the GLC, and I can tell you that the upgraded hi-fi is better than the Burmeister branded (but with no Burmeister manufactured equipment) GLC version.
So, sorry to provide this feedback on an MB forum (which is what I had planned to buy of course, and why I'm a poster here) but these are my honest thoughts having gone through a process of evaluating the two cars. Phil above came to a different view I know, and that's fine, but I'm very happy with where I got to(and thanks to JP Dejongj for his help as well!!)



