Sport +








Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG












E-ABC leans into the curve, based on your selection of 1,2, or 3 - levels of tilt. It's a comfort setting.
The ARC doesn't lean INTO, but is designed to stay flat. It's a performance setting.
These systems are vastly different from previous versions, on various M-B models, some with the exact same name.




E-ABC leans into the curve, based on your selection of 1,2, or 3 - levels of tilt. It's a comfort setting.
The ARC doesn't lean INTO, but is designed to stay flat. It's a performance setting.
These systems are vastly different from previous versions, on various M-B models, some with the exact same name.
Drive program sport +:
The suspension setting is even firmer.
The vehicle is set to Sport + level.
ROROADSUFACE SCAN is deactivated.
The curve inclination function is active.
In sport mode both the inclination program and road scan are off. Road scan, the magic carpet part of the system, is only on in comfort and CV (curve) mode.




I admit I can be fooled by Daimler press releases, especially regarding their propensity for using the same name for different products. BTW they show E-ABC on some Coupe versions 2017-2019, just to confound things further. Belt-driven hydraulic pumps instead of direct motor-driven, as I recall.
Are you sure that there are no sway bars on E-ABC cars? Can you provide a source?
That would explain the dramatically different feel I have from my former E-ABC and my current ARC. I was hoping the ARC would fix the shortfalls of E-ABC, but it just introduces another form of instability. I think both have potential, but not ready for Prime Time yet.
I hope the OP doesn't mind if an evolving discussion of suspensions enters the thread, which began on post #5. These things happen.
I admit I can be fooled by Daimler press releases, especially regarding their propensity for using the same name for different products. BTW they show E-ABC on some Coupe versions 2017-2019, just to confound things further. Belt-driven hydraulic pumps instead of direct motor-driven, as I recall.
Are you sure that there are no sway bars on E-ABC cars? Can you provide a source?
That would explain the dramatically different feel I have from my former E-ABC and my current ARC. I was hoping the ARC would fix the shortfalls of E-ABC, but it just introduces another form of instability. I think both have potential, but not ready for Prime Time yet.
I hope the OP doesn't mind if an evolving discussion of suspensions enters the thread, which began on post #5. These things happen.




That would explain the dramatically different feel I have from my former E-ABC and my current ARC. I was hoping the ARC would fix the shortfalls of E-ABC, but it just introduces another form of instability. I think both have potential, but not ready for Prime Time yet.
Here is the system in the S-Class, which is almost the same.






Trying to judge from the "feel" of the ARC, it seems to soften bumps better than E-ABC, and do it only on the side needed. The E-ABC seems to see the road ahead (sometimes) but adjusts (relaxes) both sides equally. Comparative result - E-ABC is good on speed bumps and railroad crossings, but not potholes affecting one side. ARC adjusts for that pothole, but I don't know how.
The ride is certainly better with ARC than standard AMG53 Air, and I wish I knew the mechanism.
Audi and Porsche use active sway bars, options that cost about the same as the AMG Dynamic Plus Package on the 53. Are they different?




Heading out for the 500th mile on our new one today. Tires should be broken in.
Continental Tires seem to be the weak link in NVH and cornering so far. Adjusting to the gas flap recommendations of 41F, 35R for this trip. Seems an odd recommendation but we'll see.
81F here in the foothills. Should be a nice drive. Plenty of twisties and high speed, good visibility corners ahead.




Heading out for the 500th mile on our new one today. Tires should be broken in.
Continental Tires seem to be the weak link in NVH and cornering so far. Adjusting to the gas flap recommendations of 41F, 35R for this trip. Seems an odd recommendation but we'll see.
81F here in the foothills. Should be a nice drive. Plenty of twisties and high speed, good visibility corners ahead.
AS Conti tires are M&S rated see the sidewall. 38/33 or 46/45.




To digress, M+S is not a "rating" or performance attainment - it's just an advertising "claim." The Three Peaks Mountain Snowflake (3PMSF) is an actual performance rating. At least in the USA.
The Conti's are marked M+S, but they don't qualify for the 3PMSF, so I used the NON-3PMSF pressures. (My rationale FWIW.)
Also, the OE Conti's are marked MO-1, which means that the tires are developed for AMG cars - "Mercedes Original 1- Made specifically for AMG, MO1 tires have a rubber mixture and carcass structure that match the vehicle’s suspension." https://www.mbusa.com/en/owners/part...original-tires
We're still in break-in mode, started at 420 miles and added 140 miles round trip, gaining 2,600' in elevation, on one of my favorite local drives. Pavement from rough chip-seal to new asphalt, low traffic, great views, lots of 40 mph curves and more 90mph sweepers. Since it's breaking in, I tried to use no more than half throttle and only exceeded 85 a couple of times.
The outbound leg was pretty Ho Hum. Ride was fine on Comfort to Sport+ but the tires / suspension just didn't give much confidence. I was pleased with the ride but really disappointed with the handling. This is a AMG Ride Control car (AMG Dynamic Package). But the car still felt really heavy and stodgy, even on Sport+. Was it the tires, or just a heavy car that feels Really Heavy?
So for the return leg, I dove into the MBUX menu and changed the Individual Setting to options that I don't really understand, just to see, and headed back.
WOW What a Difference! The car came alive. The front tires had predictable grip, the car was eager for curves, and I even think the AMG 4Matic+ was adjusting for understeer/oversteer. And even though I had the exhaust set on "Balanced," there was more rev-matching than in Sport+, and more barks and burbles on overrun.
You can see the settings I made in the AMG Drive Select menus at the right of the pic below. I don't think "Dynamic" engine and "Advanced" settings are available without the AMG Dynamic Package.
I'll post some more on the settings in the @Ron.s thread 2021 GLE53 Driving Impressions vs GLE450 and add the link here later.
I am impressed - it's a new era of fun and comfort that I had hoped for but thought wasn't available any more. It's nimble!
And my Wife doesn't grab the handles as I approach that 40mph-marked corner at 65 - it's that confidence inspiring. (as long as I can see there's no deer about to jump out)
Last edited by mikapen; Apr 4, 2021 at 01:52 PM.






