E-ABC still an option??




Last edited by GregW / Oregon; Jun 17, 2020 at 11:46 AM.








The option will be available on the new S Class and Maybach models, which is really where it belongs.
Repair options won't be an issue.
I did not see it on the DOG for the non-AMG GLEs. It may still be available on Build your GLE as that seems to still have the 2020 options such as the high end Burmester which is also gone in the non-AMG GLE DOG.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG








”Correct - pick up rate was not significant - even in the China/Asia market that was the true target.
The other disappointment - Laser headlight technology put off another year due to Covid supply chain issues for that new tech..”




Does anyone have any educated guess or more information as to whether Mercedes might bring back the E-ABC option to the GLE for the 2024 facelift?




I am extremely surprised that the EAbc option in your S580 is a huge disappointment. Sorry to hear that.
I currently own an S65 Coupe with Magic Body Control (A BC) and an SL63 with ABC. I've been experiencing ABC suspension since a 2001 CL500. I couldn't love Mercedes' ABC suspension technology more than I currently do.
Just as a side note -- your E-Abc system *is* MBC. It's operational intention is identical to that of Magic Body Control. The only thing "E" about the system is that instead of a belt-driven motor to run the pump for the hydraulic fluid, which taxes the combustion engine a bit, Mercedes uses a 48V system to power the pump. This saves on fuel (somewhat), and eliminates a motor. Otherwise, the system is exactly the same as Magic Body Control (which is the most advanced variant of ABC and uses a camera), but probably with some production improvements for the new generation of implementation of ABC.
I am extremely surprised that the EAbc option in your S580 is a huge disappointment. Sorry to hear that.
I currently own an S65 Coupe with Magic Body Control (A BC) and an SL63 with ABC. I've been experiencing ABC suspension since a 2001 CL500. I couldn't love Mercedes' ABC suspension technology more than I currently do.
Just as a side note -- your E-Abc system *is* MBC. It's operational intention is identical to that of Magic Body Control. The only thing "E" about the system is that instead of a belt-driven motor to run the pump for the hydraulic fluid, which taxes the combustion engine a bit, Mercedes uses a 48V system to power the pump. This saves on fuel (somewhat), and eliminates a motor. Otherwise, the system is exactly the same as Magic Body Control (which is the most advanced variant of ABC and uses a camera), but probably with some production improvements for the new generation of implementation of ABC.




Interesting. So in terms of calibration and riding well — can you expand a bit? I’m guessing possibilities here — Is the ride quality too stiff? Too sporty? Not sporty enough and too soft? Does it not correct the body roll well, or maybe it does not correct quickly enough?




I would hope the calibration would be different.
My E-ABC was a bit floaty - is the S-Class more floaty?




You have/had E-abc in which model?




Not sure why anybody would compare an S with a GLE, so I asked.
Last edited by mikapen; Sep 16, 2022 at 01:40 PM.








In short, the E-ABC seems more for passenger comfort, and the AMG ARC is more for responsive handling and max grip.
Both are very good at what they do.
IMO all the 167 suspensions are somewhat floaty, except the ARC.
The E-ABC tames this a lot, but not completely. ARC fixes floaty.
E-ABC does a great job of anticipating dips and speed humps (using its cameras) that are the width of the car; ARC does better when only one side is affected, like potholes.
I didn't like the E-ABC "Curve" function because it leans more than you'd expect, even though it's adjustable. It's definitely not a Performance setting. Passengers loved it, though.
On the 53, the ARC gives a smoother ride than standard 53 air.
I miss the E-ABC off-road capabilities, not only the massive ground clearance, but the ability to extend an individual wheel that has low traction.
ARC has less clearance, although it's Max lift is similar to standard Air. It adds Trail and Sand modes which are great for Forest Service roads and wandering about.
But the chin spoiler on the AMG really limits approach angle, so I have resigned myself to the fact that I'll no longer be able to do heavy duty off-roading or overlanding. Which I did a LOT, with my 164 and 166.
I was fortunate to sample the E-ABC (owned), ARC, GLE 53 Standard Air, 450 Standard Air, and 350 steel springs, before choosing the AMG ARC.
I put the 450 standard air at the bottom (max float), then steel springs, then E-ABC, the AMG ARC at the top for a good handling, supple ride. Interestingly, my wife agrees.
So now I track the car and wear out tires and brakes.
Last edited by mikapen; Sep 17, 2022 at 03:01 PM.




In short, the E-ABC seems more for passenger comfort, and the AMG ARC is more for responsive handling and max grip.
Both are very good at what they do.
IMO all the 167 suspensions are somewhat floaty, except the ARC.
The E-ABC tames this a lot, but not completely. ARC fixes floaty.
E-ABC does a great job of anticipating dips and speed humps (using its cameras) that are the width of the car; ARC does better when only one side is affected, like potholes.
I didn't like the E-ABC "Curve" function because it leans more than you'd expect, even though it's adjustable. It's definitely not a Performance setting. Passengers loved it, though.
On the 53, the ARC gives a smoother ride than standard 53 air.
I miss the E-ABC off-road capabilities, not only the massive ground clearance, but the ability to extend an individual wheel that has low traction.
ARC has less clearance, although it's Max lift is similar to standard Air. It adds Trail and Sand modes which are great for Forest Service roads and wandering about.
But the chin spoiler on the AMG really limits approach angle, so I have resigned myself to the fact that I'll no longer be able to do heavy duty off-roading or overlanding. Which I did a LOT, with my 164 and 166.
I was fortunate to sample the E-ABC (owned), ARC, GLE 53 Standard Air, 450 Standard Air, and 350 steel springs, before choosing the AMG ARC.
I put the 450 standard air at the bottom (max float), then steel springs, then E-ABC, the AMG ARC at the top for a good handling, supple ride. Interestingly, my wife agrees.
So now I track the car and wear out tires and brakes.




Out of curiosity, which would be your suspension of choice?


