Cracks in MB Tex leather at 9,0xx miles!?!




It doesn't matter if a car is leased or owned, the material quality is either there or it is not. It's also more important on a lease; if this turns into actual larger rip over the next couple of years, the OP could be responsible for the damage if beyond normal wear and tear.
To me, neither pics show significant stress or surface damage and looks like a material issue that is covered by warranty. Not the first time on the 2020 GLE's which have struggled with poor vendor quality of its MB-Tex interiors.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




It doesn't matter if a car is leased or owned, the material quality is either there or it is not. It's also more important on a lease; if this turns into actual larger rip over the next couple of years, the OP could be responsible for the damage if beyond normal wear and tear.
To me, neither pics show significant stress or surface damage and looks like a material issue that is covered by warranty. Not the first time on the 2020 GLE's which have struggled with poor vendor quality of its MB-Tex interiors.




While I don't care for the ML/GLE models they have been some of the most trouble-free cars we have had; just fuel/maintain and go...
In regards to the V167 GLE's, Mercedes had significant issues with interiors and bumpers, etc. almost all of which were vendor related if memory serves. They had to refit thousands of cars in the US and Germany. This was a US vendor AFAIK
. Similar issue with the news GLS as well.Vendor problems do exist and that has nothing to do with being cheap or making cars cheaper.
Last edited by Wolfman; Jan 4, 2021 at 06:23 PM.




While I don't care for the ML/GLE models they have been some of the most trouble-free cars we have had; just fuel/maintain and go...
In regards to the V167 GLE's, Mercedes had significant issues with interiors and bumpers, etc. almost all of which were vendor related if memory serves. They had to refit thousands of cars in the US and Germany. This was a US vendor AFAIK

Vendor problems do exist and that has nothing to do with being cheap or making cars cheaper.
Last edited by E55Greasemonkey; Feb 15, 2021 at 09:30 PM.




Had every S-Class they made since the W126 (actually had even an old W116 which we restored) and every SL from the R129. First SUV was a 2000 ML320. Last was 2018 E63s and 2017 SL550. Now we have a AMG GTC roadster and a V167 GLE350...
You mention cars that I don't consider but the my experience is literally the direct opposite. 2000-2007 was the worst period when it came to quality and warranty claims. 2007 to 2013 were better but still well below 2014 but am sure that may vary by model. I do have some insights due to family connections to MB Germany but most of that is strategic...
Pre-2000 cars had their issues as well but one of the reasons a lot of these older cars still run is they were stupid simple with less options and very little tech (by today's standards).
Last edited by Wolfman; Jan 4, 2021 at 07:24 PM.




IMO, the Mercedes is about as complicated as any production car and as volume increases so do quality control issues. All manufacturers, in any industry are constantly looking for cost savings, better efficiency and when they stop being competitive they won’t be around long. Having entry level cars can build loyalty and as incomes increase then so might the buyer increase the amount they can spend for a car. Most Luxury or Specialized Auto Companies without a lower tier of vehicles have failed to survive for the most part or are now a division of a larger company so why do some keep harping on degrading the brand with lower tier cars? If someone is unhappy with a product then make a change and hope the “grass is really greener”.
Last edited by chassis; Jan 5, 2021 at 10:07 PM.




Last edited by Wolfman; Jan 5, 2021 at 03:00 AM.
IMO, the Mercedes is about as complicated as any production car and as volume increases so do quality control issues. All manufacturers, in any industry are constantly looking for cost savings, better efficiency and when they stop being competitive they won’t be around long. Having entry level cars can build loyalty and as incomes increase then so might the buyer increase the amount they can spend for a car. Most Luxury or Specialized Auto Companies without a lower tier of vehicles have failed to survive for the most part or are now a division of a larger company so why do some keep harping on degrading the brand with lower tier cars? If someone is unhappy with a product then make a change and hope the “grass is really greener”.




Example - The "cost-cutting" you outline has resulted in improved chassis builds, class-leading engines, class-leading safety, and industry dominance.
Also, it appears that you're somewhat out of touch with other manufacturers and their similar problems.
But this is typical of mechanics who spend their time working on the broken examples - not on the non-broken cars. Go to ANY dealer and find the place designated for mechanics to park their personal cars. They invariably drive competitors' cars.
In addition to experiencing the problem cars in the shop, an unfortunate problem with Factory Training for technicians is that there is invariably one Macho trainer who thinks he will show just how superior he is, by badmouthing the brand. (Yes I am factory trained on several Euro makes, although not Mercedes.)
What we see above is the Parroting of that experience on this forum, but with little real insight into the subject. Locker room talk.




I am not saying he was right or wrong. It's just his perception.








Why discourage people shopping for <$40k cars from having a new one with full factory warranty and dealership support?
I suggest that those who are offended that M-B is competing with "lesser" brands, perhaps buy a Bentley and go smugly about their business. THAT will certainly teach Mercedes a lesson! Take That, Mercedes!!!




I agree that MB-Tex is among the best of the plastic interiors, but I prefer a good hide next to me. Or maybe fabric.
Different strokes for different folks.








