Service A and B Question




I would not defer or neglect any critical fluid change, including the transmission. Iridium plugs at 50,000 miles is a bit ridiculous since they should be good for 100,000 miles, but not a transmission service at 70,000 or 75,000 miles. Also, engine oil should be changed every 3000 to 5000 miles -- 10,000 miles is nonsensical marketing hype.




If you've ever dealt with that, you do not want to deal with it again.
If you want your warranty/service contract to stay in effect, maintenance schedules are important.




If you've ever dealt with that, you do not want to deal with it again.
If you want your warranty/service contract to stay in effect, maintenance schedules are important.
Having said that, if someone offers me $500 to replace them, as in the post above, I'd probably do that early just for spiritual reasons . But for thousands of dollars? No way am wasting my money on that. That's just way too much for something the car does not need and will never ever need during my max 70-75K miles for an SUV ownership as far as mileage.
Last edited by S_W222; Dec 7, 2025 at 12:43 PM.




But it's not worth the spiritual aspect at 1500-2000 USD. I do waste more than couple hundred dollars on "silly" car related stuff, but sparks for 1500-2000 USD isn't something that will bring joy to me and I won't even notice the difference.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
In my case it also found the valve cover leak. Had that not happened I might have kept that car in which case that would have eventually cost me $5,000+ because the car would have been out of warranty by the time I realized it was leaking. Doing the scheduled maintenance uncovers repairs that need to be done before they grow to be big problems that cost even more to fix.
Last edited by SW20S; Dec 7, 2025 at 01:03 PM.




In my case it also found the valve cover leak. Had that not happened I might have kept that car in which case that would have eventually cost me $5,000+ because the car would have been out of warranty by the time I realized it was leaking. Doing the scheduled maintenance uncovers repairs that need to be done before they grow to be big problems that cost even more to fix.
For my engine (M276) the OE filter is Purflux 2761800009 and identical to the Mercedes Genuine filter.
If you've ever dealt with that, you do not want to deal with it again.
If you want your warranty/service contract to stay in effect, maintenance schedules are important.
What does your dealer charge for just an oil change? I was surprised mine was only $160. So I just have the 5k extra changes done there too
Last edited by SW20S; Dec 7, 2025 at 02:13 PM.




What does your dealer charge for just an oil change? I was surprised mine was only $160. So I just have the 5k extra changes done there too
My independent also has loaners, they're VW Jettas but its nice to have a loaner. I do like driving a different MB for a day or so while its in for service...so thats worth something to me too.
BUT, dealer was $1,800 for plugs vs $550 at the independent. Dealer was $2,500 just for brake pads while the independent was $2,100 for pads AND rotors, and I was able to use ceramic pads which the dealer refused to do. The rotors alone are $1,000. That savings is worth using him vs the dealer.
Last edited by SW20S; Dec 7, 2025 at 04:06 PM.
Anyway, just make sure the oil is appropriate. You can find the specifications for your engine here:
https://operatingfluids.mercedes-benz.com/sheet/223.2
*see link for confirmation
Last edited by GTIBlack; Dec 8, 2025 at 09:41 AM.



They fitted 0w-20 oil and didnt change the brake fluid.
Its the first service B with 18,500 kilometers on the clock.
Still, I would never use a 0W-20 weight oil in a Mercedes turbo engine, especially living in a tropical climate. But, that's just me.




Anyway, just make sure the oil is appropriate. You can find the specifications for your engine here:
https://operatingfluids.mercedes-benz.com/sheet/223.2
*see link for confirmation
MBenz GEO 5W30 is the MB-Approval 229.52 specification in a 5W-30 viscosity. Looks like they put the right oil. In fact, 0W-40 or 5W-40 that u suggested are very rare for 229.51 modern applications, and even if they are acceptable, Mbenz X167 manual clearly says that it is recommended to use ("lowest SAE viscosity class in each case"). Hence 5W-30 is the best option for the engine in this case for MB 229.51 specs. 0W-40 or 5W-40 are recommended for the GLS 600 but not mentioned for the 450.
Another acceptable option is 0W-20 but only for the 229.72 specification case (but I would only go this route if I live somewhere dominated by 12 months of cold months). 229.51 with 5W-30 has the best balance and well within what the X167 manual recommends.
Last edited by S_W222; Dec 8, 2025 at 11:07 AM.




My shop used the new spec when they changed my AMG53 oil in July '25.
The new spec made many of the old charts obsolete. Mine went from the previous "5WXX" to "0WXX."




My shop used the new spec when they changed my AMG53 oil in July '25.
The new spec made many of the old charts obsolete. Mine went from the previous "5WXX" to "0WXX."
Most dealers/techs would go with 0W-20 229.72 cause it is always safe and matches what the manual clearly recommends the thinnest oil that is still within the acceptable specs. If u don't want to be on either extremes (which is my strategy), 229.51 with 5W-30 has the nice balance for those who live in a mixed weather with a few months of warm weather combined with cold months. it is not the absolute thinnest and not the thickest approved oil option for this engine. Both of these are post LSPI dilema and are LSPI-proof
Last edited by S_W222; Dec 8, 2025 at 11:36 AM.
I do wonder what is the motivation to move to a 0W-20 oil. We know it should improve gas mileage, etc., but is it good for our engines? Just because it is recommended or specified does not mean it is necessarily the best choice for our engines. There are manufacturers in the US (i.e., GM) that are backing away from 0W-20 due to a higher number of catastrophic engine failures and are now recommending 5W-30. The craziness with low viscosity oils appears to be driven by politics rather than good engineering.
HOWEVER, staying with the recommended viscosities while under warranty is probably prudent, especially if you stay with genuine/OE oil filters and shorter change intervals. My cars are no longer under warranty, so I don't need to worry about that.




HOWEVER, staying with the recommended viscosities while under warranty is probably prudent, especially if you stay with genuine/OE oil filters and shorter change intervals. My cars are no longer under warranty, so I don't need to worry about that.
Last edited by S_W222; Dec 8, 2025 at 11:59 AM.



