Auto 05 c230 vs 03/04 c240 4 matic
06-03-2005, 04:04 PM
#26
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2001 C240 Tectite
Originally Posted by delbomber
Finally, a rational argument. But these engines are intercooled, mitigating the otherwise increased heatsoak effect of a supercharger.
ps: don't forget that on ctc230k dynos he had K&N upgraded filters, that's a reported 3-5 hp gain over stock...
Last edited by Narcissus; 06-03-2005 at 04:15 PM.
06-03-2005, 04:37 PM
#27
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by delbomber
From the looks of your license plate trim, you're already playing 
I had an audisport logo on my A4, but thats not the same as S4 rebadging.
06-03-2005, 04:38 PM
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05 C230wz 6M
Originally Posted by Narcissus
Heatsoak comes form the stock intercooler that, even if it's an MB, is really poor. some users from the other forum have tried to add a larger intercooler, one form renntech but reported HP loss, I believe someone tried to install a water to air intercooler or a water mist system but I don't remember the results... You can clearly see the effect on ctc230k's dynos when the torque goes down to 110 at a 7000rpm peak. so unless you drive your car at redline all the time whe it's hot outside your car might even drop under 100 torque. you will especially notice this if you try to accelerate going uphill. You'll understand what I mean. I mean on the dyno HP might look good but it's not moving any weight at all. now add the sport package with larger and heavier brakes, larger and heavier wheels, we're talking about a lot of unsprung weight here, that's why ctc230ks dyno shows him at a much lower HP than the MB numbers.
ps: don't forget that on ctc230k dynos he had K&N upgraded filters, that's a reported 3-5 hp gain over stock...
ps: don't forget that on ctc230k dynos he had K&N upgraded filters, that's a reported 3-5 hp gain over stock...
...but his Torque peaked at 145, not 110. And it was at 7500 rpm, way off from MB's spec. I think ct's dyno is hardly representative of all C230s.
06-03-2005, 04:43 PM
#29
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2001 C240 Tectite
Originally Posted by delbomber
This really isn't the forum for this
...but his Torque peaked at 145, not 110. And it was at 7500 rpm, way off from MB's spec. I think ct's dyno is hardly representative of all C230s.
...but his Torque peaked at 145, not 110. And it was at 7500 rpm, way off from MB's spec. I think ct's dyno is hardly representative of all C230s.
Ahh yes sorry, you are right, I was referring to his 110 torque at his HP peak....
06-03-2005, 04:49 PM
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05 C230wz 6M
Originally Posted by Narcissus
Ahh yes sorry, you are right, I was referring to his 110 torque at his HP peak....
Cheers.
06-04-2005, 01:06 AM
#33
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2006 E46 M3, 2008 E92 M3
Sheesh. All this moaning and groaning over 2 SLOW *** cars that weren't even designed to race. I've owned a few with my daily 2-liter diesel 1-series for crying out loud.
06-04-2005, 01:18 PM
#34
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by ctC230K
yes, a C23.
trying to strip of weight so your car wont be slower than grandma's C240?
Come on... either buy the amg badge and not he plate frame or put the bloody 0 back on. That looks terrible.
06-04-2005, 01:41 PM
#35
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
95 Audi urS6 Quattro
Originally Posted by CynCarvin32
WTF
trying to strip of weight so your car wont be slower than grandma's C240?
Come on... either buy the amg badge and not he plate frame or put the bloody 0 back on. That looks terrible.
trying to strip of weight so your car wont be slower than grandma's C240?
Come on... either buy the amg badge and not he plate frame or put the bloody 0 back on. That looks terrible.
06-04-2005, 01:45 PM
#36
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2001 C240 Tectite
Originally Posted by Militant-Grunt
Now now kiddies, Ill take you both =P my 6500LBs suv will put you to shame
06-04-2005, 03:52 PM
#37
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by Militant-Grunt
Now now kiddies, Ill take you both =P my 6500LBs suv will put you to shame
06-08-2005, 11:42 PM
#39
Super Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
2005 Carlsson CD32 E320 CDI Inline-6
c230 vs c240 4MATIC
This is the classic story about the race between the tortise and the...tortise?
I wanna read about an SLR driven to the brink.
I wanna read about an SLR driven to the brink.
06-09-2005, 12:16 PM
#40
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2001 C240 Tectite
Originally Posted by ctC230K
bump for best kill ever
Next thing we know you'll be bragging about burning a corvette on his spare tire.
tardjar
Bragging about a 4matic, we're the one laughing, the c230k barely beat a c240 4 matic with like, 80% drivetrain loss
Last edited by Narcissus; 06-09-2005 at 12:18 PM.
06-17-2005, 02:13 PM
#42
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: California
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ML350 '06
Originally Posted by Stiggs
C240 vs. C230??
Thats like crap telling poop it stinks!!!
Thats like crap telling poop it stinks!!!
...according to this thread, shiit would argue it smells better than both! :p
Why, why, why are people arguing about the C-230 and 240? Way too much idle time on our hands fellas.
Nick
