No kill, but BS dragtimes 1/4 by SRT8!!! 12.45
http://www.dragtimes.com/Dodge-Charg...slip-9469.html
2006 Dodge charger SRT8, STOCK except cat-back, and home made CAI:rolf: Dyno 376 rwhp 367 rwto-I believe this is the real dyno, but imposible 1/4 time 4376 lbs.. w/driver Suposedly ran 12.450 @ 116.20 Damn what a bunch of BS:rolf: |
Old hp numbers maybe? :nix:
|
Originally Posted by newton22
(Post 2146875)
Old hp numbers maybe? :nix:
My Vette when stock would be damn lucky to run those times at one of those great sea level super tracks on the Eastcoast, especially the 116 trap!! Not happening w/nearly same hp, and his extra 1200 odd lbs..:nix: Just goes to show there are numerous photochopping experts like our very own SLbrabus out there.. |
That trap speed seems a little high.:confused:
|
maybe with a 150 shot:rolf:
|
lol my friend's C5 Z06 was trapping that same speed with only like 10 less rwhp except it weighed much less obviously. i smell BS
stock et/trap should be more like ~13.2-13.3@107-108mph with an awesome driver |
Originally Posted by Jons95c36amg
(Post 2146962)
That trap speed seems a little high.:confused:
|
Originally Posted by Improviz
(Post 2147567)
Yeah....I ran the numbers and it should be trapping at about 110 with that weight and horsepower. Crank hp comes out to about 455 with 376 rwhp, not enough to hit 116 w/that curb weight. To do that, he'd need about 520 crank.
Click the link, look at the slip? looks really inconsistant, numbers are different sizes etc..did try to look it up from there drag site, but no luck info was if I'm reading it correctly date 11/05/06 10:36 car # 747 |
I concur with the OP...I was at Englishtown this last Saturday and witnessed a few SRT8's hitting times like that....However one had heads and cam, exhaust/intake etc..the other was a 150 shot....So deffinately that list of mods on the SRT8 the OP posted is bogus if that SRT8 did indeed do those times.....116mph is heads and cam or 150shot nitrous territory...
|
12.7 @110 mph 300cSRT8 See Will (NYC_SRT8):naughty:
|
Originally Posted by ProjectC55
(Post 2148049)
12.7 @110 mph 300cSRT8 See Will (NYC_SRT8):naughty:
|
maybe a nitrous run.... will write the owner and check...
|
Originally Posted by Thericker
(Post 2147591)
You don't find the ETA a little off too?:confused:
But that wouldn't explain the trap, which is why I focused on that. That car doesn't have the oats to hit that trap, DR's or no.
Originally Posted by Thericker
(Post 2147591)
Click the link, look at the slip? looks really inconsistant, numbers are different sizes etc..did try to look it up from there drag site, but no luck info was if I'm reading it correctly date 11/05/06 10:36 car # 747
|
Originally Posted by Thericker
(Post 2148051)
It's still a HUGE difference from 12.45 @ 116, I'm sure that run above was w/drag rads? and mods:rolleyes:
Actually my best is 12.6 @ 112 and when I was stock 12.9 @109. Those hp numbers would equate to 13.1 @108-109. Either the guy is spaying a 100shot or heads, cam, headers, exhaust and drag radials are in the picture. It's all about power to weight ratio. It will be physically impossible to trap those speeds with 370+ whp and weighing 4300lbs. Give him the benefit of the doubt. He probably didn't dyno with his new mods. |
Originally Posted by nyc_srt8
(Post 2148963)
Actually my best is 12.6 @ 112 and when I was stock 12.9 @109. Those hp numbers would equate to 13.1 @108-109. Either the guy is spaying a 100shot or heads, cam, headers, exhaust and drag radials are in the picture. It's all about power to weight ratio. It will be physically impossible to trap those speeds with 370+ whp and weighing 4300lbs.
Give him the benefit of the doubt. He probably didn't dyno with his new mods. |
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
(Post 2148977)
Difficult to give someone the benefit of the doubt when the numbers don't match up and the car's entire profile on dragtimes emphatically states STOCK in virtually every category. :bs:
|
Originally Posted by nyc_srt8
(Post 2148963)
Actually my best is 12.6 @ 112 and when I was stock 12.9 @109. Those hp numbers would equate to 13.1 @108-109. Either the guy is spaying a 100shot or heads, cam, headers, exhaust and drag radials are in the picture. It's all about power to weight ratio. It will be physically impossible to trap those speeds with 370+ whp and weighing 4300lbs.
Give him the benefit of the doubt. He probably didn't dyno with his new mods. |
Originally Posted by Improviz
(Post 2147567)
Yeah....I ran the numbers and it should be trapping at about 110 with that weight and horsepower. Crank hp comes out to about 455 with 376 rwhp, not enough to hit 116 w/that curb weight. To do that, he'd need about 520 crank.
|
:bsflag:
|
Originally Posted by Jons95c36amg
(Post 2149632)
I was so close to getting the 01 clk 55 amg. Its quicker then my Z. But I couldnt give up the Z. So I got the c36 a whole lot cheaper and have the Z too! C36 is my daily driver.
|
It seems the Inline 6 is smoother than the Zs v6.
|
Originally Posted by Jons95c36amg
(Post 2149632)
I was so close to getting the 01 clk 55 amg. Its quicker then my Z. But I couldnt give up the Z. So I got the c36 a whole lot cheaper and have the Z too! C36 is my daily driver.
|
Originally Posted by Jons95c36amg
(Post 2151862)
It seems the Inline 6 is smoother than the Zs v6.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:08 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands