Kill Stories Discuss your exciting high speed excursions here!

No kill, but BS dragtimes 1/4 by SRT8!!! 12.45

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-17-2007, 06:48 PM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Thericker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
No kill, but BS dragtimes 1/4 by SRT8!!! 12.45

http://www.dragtimes.com/Dodge-Charg...slip-9469.html

2006 Dodge charger SRT8, STOCK except cat-back, and home made CAI

Dyno 376 rwhp 367 rwto-I believe this is the real dyno, but imposible 1/4 time

4376 lbs.. w/driver

Suposedly ran 12.450 @ 116.20

Damn what a bunch of BS
Old 04-17-2007, 06:57 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
newton22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 4,574
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
BMW E39
Old hp numbers maybe?
Old 04-17-2007, 07:07 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Thericker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Originally Posted by newton22
Old hp numbers maybe?
What do you mean "Old hp #'s maybe?" that's what they make around stock like his, also he lists mods?

My Vette when stock would be damn lucky to run those times at one of those great sea level super tracks on the Eastcoast, especially the 116 trap!! Not happening w/nearly same hp, and his extra 1200 odd lbs..

Just goes to show there are numerous photochopping experts like our very own SLbrabus out there..
Old 04-17-2007, 07:34 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
That trap speed seems a little high.
Old 04-18-2007, 12:16 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
EvilllEmpirE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fort Lee, NJ and SoCal (Rancho C)
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Audi S4 Avant and BMW X5 4.4
maybe with a 150 shot
Old 04-18-2007, 12:35 AM
  #6  
Member
 
baybenzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 925
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 E320 sport
lol my friend's C5 Z06 was trapping that same speed with only like 10 less rwhp except it weighed much less obviously. i smell BS

stock et/trap should be more like ~13.2-13.3@107-108mph with an awesome driver
Old 04-18-2007, 12:38 AM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Improviz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS55 AMG
Originally Posted by Jons95c36amg
That trap speed seems a little high.
Yeah....I ran the numbers and it should be trapping at about 110 with that weight and horsepower. Crank hp comes out to about 455 with 376 rwhp, not enough to hit 116 w/that curb weight. To do that, he'd need about 520 crank.
Old 04-18-2007, 12:51 AM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Thericker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Originally Posted by Improviz
Yeah....I ran the numbers and it should be trapping at about 110 with that weight and horsepower. Crank hp comes out to about 455 with 376 rwhp, not enough to hit 116 w/that curb weight. To do that, he'd need about 520 crank.
You don't find the ETA a little off too?
Click the link, look at the slip? looks really inconsistant, numbers are different sizes etc..did try to look it up from there drag site, but no luck info was if I'm reading it correctly date 11/05/06 10:36 car # 747

Last edited by Thericker; 04-18-2007 at 02:06 AM.
Old 04-18-2007, 06:46 AM
  #9  
Member
 
350Zman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I concur with the OP...I was at Englishtown this last Saturday and witnessed a few SRT8's hitting times like that....However one had heads and cam, exhaust/intake etc..the other was a 150 shot....So deffinately that list of mods on the SRT8 the OP posted is bogus if that SRT8 did indeed do those times.....116mph is heads and cam or 150shot nitrous territory...
Old 04-18-2007, 07:00 AM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ProjectC55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: City with Tall buildings!
Posts: 5,475
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
12.7 @110 mph 300cSRT8 See Will (NYC_SRT8)
Old 04-18-2007, 07:06 AM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Thericker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Originally Posted by ProjectC55
12.7 @110 mph 300cSRT8 See Will (NYC_SRT8)
It's still a HUGE difference from 12.45 @ 116, I'm sure that run above was w/drag rads? and mods
Old 04-18-2007, 07:55 AM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Fikse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,662
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
STS,FGT,12C,P85D,M4
maybe a nitrous run.... will write the owner and check...
Old 04-18-2007, 01:13 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Improviz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS55 AMG
Originally Posted by Thericker
You don't find the ETA a little off too?
Of course I do....don't assume so much. I think with DR's and a perfect launch, one of those things might be able to hit in the mid-to-high 12's given that stock some have hit very low 13's (possibly high 12's? I forget..)....on a high-torque car like that, DR's can easily shave off 1/2 second or so.

But that wouldn't explain the trap, which is why I focused on that. That car doesn't have the oats to hit that trap, DR's or no.

Originally Posted by Thericker
Click the link, look at the slip? looks really inconsistant, numbers are different sizes etc..did try to look it up from there drag site, but no luck info was if I'm reading it correctly date 11/05/06 10:36 car # 747
I looked at it, but it wasn't large enough for me to examine carefully and I was in a hurry. It could be genuine from a different car, or he's modded, something like that. Wasn't an obvious fraud to my eyes like SLBrabuBSBSBS's Microsoft Word-generated forgery.
Old 04-18-2007, 03:34 PM
  #14  
Member
 
nyc_srt8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Thericker
It's still a HUGE difference from 12.45 @ 116, I'm sure that run above was w/drag rads? and mods

Actually my best is 12.6 @ 112 and when I was stock 12.9 @109. Those hp numbers would equate to 13.1 @108-109. Either the guy is spaying a 100shot or heads, cam, headers, exhaust and drag radials are in the picture. It's all about power to weight ratio. It will be physically impossible to trap those speeds with 370+ whp and weighing 4300lbs.

Give him the benefit of the doubt. He probably didn't dyno with his new mods.

Last edited by nyc_srt8; 04-18-2007 at 03:37 PM.
Old 04-18-2007, 03:38 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Cylinder Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,706
Received 541 Likes on 359 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Originally Posted by nyc_srt8
Actually my best is 12.6 @ 112 and when I was stock 12.9 @109. Those hp numbers would equate to 13.1 @108-109. Either the guy is spaying a 100shot or heads, cam, headers, exhaust and drag radials are in the picture. It's all about power to weight ratio. It will be physically impossible to trap those speeds with 370+ whp and weighing 4300lbs.

Give him the benefit of the doubt. He probably didn't dyno with his new mods.
Difficult to give someone the benefit of the doubt when the numbers don't match up and the car's entire profile on dragtimes emphatically states STOCK in virtually every category.
Old 04-18-2007, 03:44 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Thericker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Originally Posted by Cylinder Head
Difficult to give someone the benefit of the doubt when the numbers don't match up and the car's entire profile on dragtimes emphatically states STOCK in virtually every category.
Thank you! I feel the same way, it's not just (1) little clerical issue, the entire Ragtimes write-up = Damn your sig =

Last edited by Thericker; 04-18-2007 at 03:48 PM.
Old 04-18-2007, 03:55 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Thericker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Originally Posted by nyc_srt8
Actually my best is 12.6 @ 112 and when I was stock 12.9 @109. Those hp numbers would equate to 13.1 @108-109. Either the guy is spaying a 100shot or heads, cam, headers, exhaust and drag radials are in the picture. It's all about power to weight ratio. It will be physically impossible to trap those speeds with 370+ whp and weighing 4300lbs.

Give him the benefit of the doubt. He probably didn't dyno with his new mods.
Thanks for replying, your track data backs up my original thoughts...Also nice modded runs
Old 04-18-2007, 08:41 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Originally Posted by Improviz
Yeah....I ran the numbers and it should be trapping at about 110 with that weight and horsepower. Crank hp comes out to about 455 with 376 rwhp, not enough to hit 116 w/that curb weight. To do that, he'd need about 520 crank.
I was so close to getting the 01 clk 55 amg. Its quicker then my Z. But I couldnt give up the Z. So I got the c36 a whole lot cheaper and have the Z too! C36 is my daily driver.
Old 04-18-2007, 10:47 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMG_55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: mymbonline
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mymbonline
Old 04-19-2007, 01:24 AM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Improviz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS55 AMG
Originally Posted by Jons95c36amg
I was so close to getting the 01 clk 55 amg. Its quicker then my Z. But I couldnt give up the Z. So I got the c36 a whole lot cheaper and have the Z too! C36 is my daily driver.
Good choice for a daily! That inline six is sssmmmmooottthhh, like buttah! Too bad they switched to the V6s after that!! Gives them more flexibility, but they're just not nearly as sweet.
Old 04-19-2007, 09:08 PM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
It seems the Inline 6 is smoother than the Zs v6.
Old 04-20-2007, 11:39 PM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ProjectC55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: City with Tall buildings!
Posts: 5,475
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
Originally Posted by Jons95c36amg
I was so close to getting the 01 clk 55 amg. Its quicker then my Z. But I couldnt give up the Z. So I got the c36 a whole lot cheaper and have the Z too! C36 is my daily driver.
Trade the C36 in for the CLK55! Do IT!!!
Old 04-21-2007, 01:20 AM
  #23  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Improviz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS55 AMG
Originally Posted by Jons95c36amg
It seems the Inline 6 is smoother than the Zs v6.
Inline 6's are always smoother than V6's, although some manufacturers (Audi in particular) make V6's that are quite smooth.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: No kill, but BS dragtimes 1/4 by SRT8!!! 12.45



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:46 AM.