Kill Stories Discuss your exciting high speed excursions here!

C55k vs R8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-19-2010, 08:52 PM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
alumar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Troy, IL (near St. Louis, MO)
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
2019 E63s AMG
C55k vs R8

Posted under the C32/C55 section, but just figured this is more of an appropriate section to post.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2VjPfKB1-w

C55k takes the win
Old 10-19-2010, 10:14 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Thats sad for a "supercar". Mustve been the V8 425hp. The V10 520hp wouldve been a different story.
Old 10-20-2010, 10:43 AM
  #3  
Administrator

 
Vic55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 796 Likes on 495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
Supercars are not always the fastest. Drive the R8-- its quite the car. And yes there is no way that was the V10.
Old 10-20-2010, 11:21 AM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
transferred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OC, SoCal
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 S65, 06 M3 CS(stick), 02 BMW X5 4.6iS, 07 R1 Raven, 08 F-450 4x4, 08 CooperS JCW
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Vic55
Supercars are not always the fastest. Drive the R8-- its quite the car. And yes there is no way that was the V10.
Agreed....

Just want to add two things to "alumar":

1. Good kill anyways, one hellvua sleeper you have there

2. What did the red truck run that was ahead of you? Those things can be scary quick through the 1/4 consdiering they weigh 7500lbs (scary fast, and scary stability)

-Rob
Old 10-20-2010, 11:28 AM
  #5  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
alumar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Troy, IL (near St. Louis, MO)
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
2019 E63s AMG
Originally Posted by transferred
Agreed....

Just want to add two things to "alumar":

1. Good kill anyways, one hellvua sleeper you have there

2. What did the red truck run that was ahead of you? Those things can be scary quick through the 1/4 consdiering they weigh 7500lbs (scary fast, and scary stability)

-Rob

The Audi was a Bone Stock R8 V8 (2009) /w 9k miles and his best of the night was 12.97 @ 108.8 - once he got the hang of launching ... he was launching @ 3k rpm by the end of the night, which is nearly dumping the clutch ...not the best for the car

My best of the night was 12.33 @ 116.11, as you can see from my signature the benz normally is low 12's not high 12's... but I slipped a bit in the video, yet the power brought the win.

A V10 525hp version would have been a different story, esp if driven properly. Those are high 11 sec cars at about 115mph due to the AWD

Lastly, the truck in front of me was a desiel and it ran like 12.88 @ 111 ...f'in quick
Old 10-20-2010, 05:29 PM
  #6  
Super Member
 
Deuuuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Charger SRT-8
Originally Posted by alumar
A V10 525hp version would have been a different story, esp if driven properly. Those are high 11 sec cars at about 115mph due to the AWD
115mph at your track? A 6spd AMT car would trap in the low 120s.
Old 10-21-2010, 10:40 AM
  #7  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
alumar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Troy, IL (near St. Louis, MO)
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
2019 E63s AMG
Originally Posted by Deuuuce
115mph at your track? A 6spd AMT car would trap in the low 120s.
The fastest on dragtimes is 11.88 @ 121mph, and does not say its stock only...

The few that are listed are showing low 12's @ 115-117mph

http://www.dragtimes.com/Audi-R8-Timeslip-20314.html

525HP to the crank on those results in the mid-high 460's to wheels, which is indicative of high teens on a trap

If they were actually putting near 500AWHP ...then ya, it would be low 120's to mid
Old 10-21-2010, 11:59 AM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
transferred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OC, SoCal
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 S65, 06 M3 CS(stick), 02 BMW X5 4.6iS, 07 R1 Raven, 08 F-450 4x4, 08 CooperS JCW
I think that 525 is something of a conservative figure so as not to annoy Lambo...this is what I read in one of the Brit mags so take it FWIW
Old 10-21-2010, 02:18 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
Very disappointing times for the R80, slower than my 63
Old 10-21-2010, 10:31 PM
  #10  
Super Member
 
Deuuuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Charger SRT-8
Originally Posted by alumar
The fastest on dragtimes is 11.88 @ 121mph, and does not say its stock only...

The few that are listed are showing low 12's @ 115-117mph

http://www.dragtimes.com/Audi-R8-Timeslip-20314.html

525HP to the crank on those results in the mid-high 460's to wheels, which is indicative of high teens on a trap

If they were actually putting near 500AWHP ...then ya, it would be low 120's to mid
Funny, 3 of the 4 stock V10s are trapping 120+ mph on dragtimes.
Old 10-22-2010, 12:36 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
kindafast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
W210 E55 & W204 C63
Originally Posted by alumar
The fastest on dragtimes is 11.88 @ 121mph, and does not say its stock only...

The few that are listed are showing low 12's @ 115-117mph

http://www.dragtimes.com/Audi-R8-Timeslip-20314.html

525HP to the crank on those results in the mid-high 460's to wheels, which is indicative of high teens on a trap

If they were actually putting near 500AWHP ...then ya, it would be low 120's to mid
Horsepower alone doesn't mean anything. With AWD and a rough weight of 3500lbs the R8 SHOULD be trapping low-mid 120's @ high 11's.

Look at the GTR, it weighs 3800lbs, has about 50 less hp and they run high 11's at high teens - low 120's.

Just because the times are on drag times doesn't mean the drivers were beating their car at the track or knew how to race them.
Old 10-22-2010, 05:47 PM
  #12  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
alumar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Troy, IL (near St. Louis, MO)
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
2019 E63s AMG
Originally Posted by kindafast
Horsepower alone doesn't mean anything. With AWD and a rough weight of 3500lbs the R8 SHOULD be trapping low-mid 120's @ high 11's.

Look at the GTR, it weighs 3800lbs, has about 50 less hp and they run high 11's at high teens - low 120's.

Just because the times are on drag times doesn't mean the drivers were beating their car at the track or knew how to race them.
I understand the calculation and after more review of the R8 V10, it does in fact look like it’s a consistent low 120 trap car. Sorry wasn’t the proverbial expert on that exact car, I shouldn't of made a statement that would resonate as such.

Additionally, I understand the physics at play ...there is a lot of factors in the calculation if you take driver part out of it.

Drag coeff, traction, weight, gearing, horsepower.... all factors on a trap time...Not to mention the countless measures on the car, heat soak, oil temp... etc

You couple that with a driver with limited experience and you can have all sorts of weird results.

I have seen an immeasurable amount of examples where everyone knew a particular car should do X and it did Y ... Case in point my race vs a Z06 Ligenfelter /w MT slicks ... Should have done a lot better ... yet see results

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0MngBCToBw


Last edited by alumar; 10-22-2010 at 05:53 PM.
Old 10-22-2010, 05:56 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
kindafast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
W210 E55 & W204 C63
Originally Posted by alumar
I understand the calculation and after more review of the R8 V10, it does in fact look like it’s a consistent low 120 trap car. Sorry wasn’t the proverbial expert on that exact car, I shouldn't of made a statement that would resonate as such.

Additionally, I understand the physics at play ...there is a lot of factors in the calculation if you take driver part out of it.

Drag coeff, traction, weight, gearing, horsepower.... all factors on a trap time...Not to mention the countless measures on the car, heat soak, oil temp... etc

You couple that with a driver with limited experience and you can have all sorts of weird results.

I have seen an immeasurable amount of examples where everyone knew a particular car should do X and it did Y ... Case in point my race vs a Z06 Ligenfelter /w MT slicks ... Should have done a lot better ... yet see results

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0MngBCToBw
Yeah exactly.

You have a sick car though Alumar. I am currently picking out a new daily and the C55 is a contender. I just love the way that redesigned front end looks, plus the price they are selling for these days is a bargain.


Edit: Seems like the Vette shifted too early from 2nd to 3rd. Do you know if it was an NA or a SCed Lingenfelter?

Last edited by kindafast; 10-22-2010 at 05:59 PM.
Old 10-22-2010, 08:29 PM
  #14  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
alumar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Troy, IL (near St. Louis, MO)
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
2019 E63s AMG
It was labeled on the video as S/C'd but after talking with the Driver on Z06 forums, it was a H/C and few other bolt on N/A LPE car... still it shoulda been around your ET/Traps

He seemed like he was shortshifting
Old 11-17-2010, 05:10 AM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MIKESV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: bay area, california
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Aston Martin V8 Vantage
Originally Posted by alumar
I understand the calculation and after more review of the R8 V10, it does in fact look like it’s a consistent low 120 trap car. Sorry wasn’t the proverbial expert on that exact car, I shouldn't of made a statement that would resonate as such.

Additionally, I understand the physics at play ...there is a lot of factors in the calculation if you take driver part out of it.

Drag coeff, traction, weight, gearing, horsepower.... all factors on a trap time...Not to mention the countless measures on the car, heat soak, oil temp... etc

You couple that with a driver with limited experience and you can have all sorts of weird results.

I have seen an immeasurable amount of examples where everyone knew a particular car should do X and it did Y ... Case in point my race vs a Z06 Ligenfelter /w MT slicks ... Should have done a lot better ... yet see results

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0MngBCToBw

this thing is mean!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: C55k vs R8



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:45 AM.