MB driver considering first SUV, a ML350
I've ridden in an older ML series. It's ok to get in, not like the larger Range Rovers.
Others that have driven my ML have complained about the brake feel and the accelerator sensitivity coming off idle. I'm used to it now and don't notice it but it does take a good driver to be smooth. May just be the way mine is?
I've also driven BMW's for many years, having had 2 X5's. I like the new ML better than my X5's .
Last week, gear box won't change gear, keep up to 60km/hr.
i think it is a great car.
Regards
Kevin
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I agree it is COMPLETELY the opposite of 'twitchy'. If it is anything it is a bit sluggish!
She may feel more comfortable in a floaty Ford Explorer!
I've had M3's, and M5, M-Roadster, CLK, S4 and a bunch of other cars. I'm more than capable of driving, pardner.
We test drove one 2009 ML350 back in late Feb/Early March. "Twitchy" means that the steering did not track as "solid" or "predictable" as I'm accustomed to from a MB. The ML350 responded to extremely small steering inputs much faster than (for example) the X5.
My recommendation is to test drive one yourself. I only provided both my opinion and my wifes. I didn't need some jerk making insults. You may love it.
I've had M3's, and M5, M-Roadster, CLK, S4 and a bunch of other cars. I'm more than capable of driving, pardner.
We test drove one 2009 ML350 back in late Feb/Early March. "Twitchy" means that the steering did not track as "solid" or "predictable" as I'm accustomed to from a MB. The ML350 responded to extremely small steering inputs much faster than (for example) the X5.
My recommendation is to test drive one yourself. I only provided both my opinion and my wifes. I didn't need some jerk making insults. You may love it.
Perhaps you would be better served to actually listen and respect that not everyone feels the same as you do.
BTW, if you ever want to test your driving skills come on down. Beaver Run is open here and it's only about 6-7 hours from you. I'll match you in terms of both vehicles - and lap times. You feel so confident, come on down. Otherwise keep your rude comments to yourself. It's easy to be a school-yard bully when you're hiding behind a screen name and a bunch of miles.
I'm done with you.
Good luck on your purchase....
Farouk
Are these needed? How about for older guests using the SUV? These older people can walk ok, can climb steps, do not use a cane or walker, but do walk a bit slower. From my experience, the large Range Rover is hard to get in but I the ML is lower and the sill not so high.
Are these needed? How about for older guests using the SUV? These older people can walk ok, can climb steps, do not use a cane or walker, but do walk a bit slower. From my experience, the large Range Rover is hard to get in but I the ML is lower and the sill not so high.
It will have a newer, more powerful engine and the 7-speed transmission, which isn't perfect.
Get out your tape measure and you'll notice the seats of the ML are a full two inches narrower than those in your E-class, meaning the car isn't as comfortable on longer trips, especially if you get MB-Tex.
The brake pedal won't feel as good as that in your E-class.
The ML will have less "trunk" space than your E-class.
The ML will handle like a pig compared to your E-class, but that's the case with any SUV.
Phone and navigation interfaces will be improved on the newer car. SAT radio is very cool, especially on long trips.
As you may have learned when purchasing your E-class, be sure to get ALL the options you want factory installed. Dealer retrofit is always twice to four times as costly.
Fuel economy will be worse than your E-class--it's a lot less aero slippery.
Last edited by lkchris; Apr 17, 2008 at 02:44 PM.









