2009 ML320 reliability
I am thinking about the new 2009 ML 320 Blutec. I drove one today and it was wonderful. However, I was wondering about reliability on the newer 320 diesels. I do know that the older ML models had some major issues, but I haven't been able to get a lot of reliable data on the new 320 reliability. I spoke to the tech at the dealership and he said they were "solid".
Any help would be greatly appreciated. I love the car, but if it is going to be a headache and in the shop alot, it isn't worth it......it that is the case, I would just as well go with Lexus or Acura, even though I don't like them as much.
I am thinking about the new 2009 ML 320 Blutec. I drove one today and it was wonderful. However, I was wondering about reliability on the newer 320 diesels. I do know that the older ML models had some major issues, but I haven't been able to get a lot of reliable data on the new 320 reliability. I spoke to the tech at the dealership and he said they were "solid".
Any help would be greatly appreciated. I love the car, but if it is going to be a headache and in the shop alot, it isn't worth it......it that is the case, I would just as well go with Lexus or Acura, even though I don't like them as much.
In our short ownership time: the vehicle was initially delivered with a damaged windshield wiper (just the blade); 3 weeks in the infamous check engine light appeard; that same week we received our first recall notice; and just yesterday the check engine light came back on, which is likely to lead to another recall notice. Something about the Urea injector, but we'll know more on Monday.
None of these issues are major or have made the vehicle undriveable. More of a huge PITA than anything. By comparison, our RX was in the shop total of 2 times in 4 years for anything other than routine maintenance (a cd player issue and a loose flap over the gas tank...both covered by warranty and easily repaired).

If you think an ML is closer to a Ferrari than a Toyota you are delusional and need to stop guzzling the MB kool aid.
In our short ownership time: the vehicle was initially delivered with a damaged windshield wiper (just the blade); 3 weeks in the infamous check engine light appeard; that same week we received our first recall notice; and just yesterday the check engine light came back on, which is likely to lead to another recall notice. Something about the Urea injector, but we'll know more on Monday.
None of these issues are major or have made the vehicle undriveable. More of a huge PITA than anything. By comparison, our RX was in the shop total of 2 times in 4 years for anything other than routine maintenance (a cd player issue and a loose flap over the gas tank...both covered by warranty and easily repaired).
That is the most ridiculous statement.

If you think an ML is closer to a Ferrari than a Toyota you are delusional and need to stop guzzling the MB kool aid.
Trending Topics
My 2009 ML350 gas job is now back in the shop for the 12th time. As an MB owner, this is the LAST time MB gets by business. It is flat out a trouble machine electrically and mechanically. I am tired of being a beta tester for MB.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The dealer usually give a loaner, warranties are fixed quickly and I think by now, most of the common bugs are gone. (Tranny reprogram/valve body change was the most serious complaint.) You may have something with the urea treatment as this is the first year in the US, but you also have a solid warranty to back it up.
As a comparison, my brother bought a new 06 Toyota Sequoia and has 60000 miles. I visited him in FL. recently and he let me use it. He does maintain his cars, but that thing needed a lot of work. Brakes pulse, suspension clunks, A/C not ice cold and the general "worn down feel." He is already forced to contemplate replacing it, where as my ML still rides as SOLID as brand new, pulls like a freight train, and needs nothing but oil changes.
Mercedes does put some durability in the vehicles they build, and you can tell they are made to last a little longer that the competition. If I had to do it again, I would stick with MB.
The recall was in regards to rear tailgate. The seals needed to be replaced as there was a potential issue with water getting inside the housing and shorting out.
Like I said previously, nothing major mechanically....but a major PITA.
I am thinking about the new 2009 ML 320 Blutec. I drove one today and it was wonderful. However, I was wondering about reliability on the newer 320 diesels. I do know that the older ML models had some major issues, but I haven't been able to get a lot of reliable data on the new 320 reliability. I spoke to the tech at the dealership and he said they were "solid".
Any help would be greatly appreciated. I love the car, but if it is going to be a headache and in the shop alot, it isn't worth it......it that is the case, I would just as well go with Lexus or Acura, even though I don't like them as much.
I have to move to Audi Forums now!

Have a good time with your MB's. I was enough. Good luck to all!










