Paint thickness variations, fraud indicator?

I talked to a certified Daimler vehicle evaluator the other day and he told me it's not uncommon for vehicles to be damaged in transit, be repaired and repainted, and no report made either to CARFAX or to buyers. A paint thickness detector works by measuring the distance between the detector tip and the underlying metal, and it shows when the vehicle has been repainted.
That, to me, is fraud!




The problem is the car has no ownership prior to being purchased from the dealer. So even if they wanted to they couldn't report it to Carfax. And even if they could they wouldn't want to.
In practice manufacturers have policies to disclose shipping damage which exceeds a set percentage of the value of the vehicle. See BMW vs. Gore in the U.S. This case is more about punitive damage awards, but it exposes that BMW's standard was damage beyond 3% of the list price of the car would be disclosed to the buyer.

The paint in the areas in question is TWICE the thickness of paint in other areas of the vehicle. That is not "failed inspection" except in someone's overactive imagination. When BOTH the front left and rear right show repair and repaint that is clearly more than 3% of the value of a $65,000 car. Besides, I bought a CERTIFIED PRE-OWNED. "Certified" does not mean "We don't disclose certain types of damage." Chicken**** excuse.



