Question - B&O vs HK
10-04-2014, 12:00 AM
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Littleton Colorado
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ML550
Question - B&O vs HK
Again, I'm new here so sorry if this has been asked before.
What is the key difference between the B&O and the HK? I have the HK and I think it sounds great! Almost as good as some aftermarket stuff I'v done in the past.
What is the key difference between the B&O and the HK? I have the HK and I think it sounds great! Almost as good as some aftermarket stuff I'v done in the past.
10-04-2014, 01:40 AM
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
The "key" difference is upscale steroe imaging and added time-delay compensation - that said the B&O is somewhat a let down from US expectation for bass-thumping... that said the new/new Birmeister systems introduced into the newest MB sedan models are kindof real awesome upgrade from HK
10-04-2014, 01:42 AM
#3
Super Member
I had b&o in my Audi a6 $6700 option and it sounded really good but bass was not big. I have HK in our 2014 ml550 and I think it sounds bigger than my dads 2014 s550 with standard burmiester. That car has an optional $7k option for an upgraded burmeister. He has at more refined sound like my Audi a6 had. I actually enjoy the hK system more than my precious Audi and my dad's s550
Last edited by jtorrebl; 10-04-2014 at 01:45 AM.
