M-Class (W166) Produced 2012-2015

Question - B&O vs HK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 4, 2014 | 12:00 AM
  #1  
ColoML550's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 53
Likes: 1
From: Littleton Colorado
ML550
Question - B&O vs HK

Again, I'm new here so sorry if this has been asked before.

What is the key difference between the B&O and the HK? I have the HK and I think it sounds great! Almost as good as some aftermarket stuff I'v done in the past.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2014 | 01:40 AM
  #2  
fabbrisd1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 6,130
Likes: 1,117
A gaggle of MB's
The "key" difference is upscale steroe imaging and added time-delay compensation - that said the B&O is somewhat a let down from US expectation for bass-thumping... that said the new/new Birmeister systems introduced into the newest MB sedan models are kindof real awesome upgrade from HK
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2014 | 01:42 AM
  #3  
jtorrebl's Avatar
Super Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 714
Likes: 10
From: Los Angeles
2025 Panamera GTS
I had b&o in my Audi a6 $6700 option and it sounded really good but bass was not big. I have HK in our 2014 ml550 and I think it sounds bigger than my dads 2014 s550 with standard burmiester. That car has an optional $7k option for an upgraded burmeister. He has at more refined sound like my Audi a6 had. I actually enjoy the hK system more than my precious Audi and my dad's s550

Last edited by jtorrebl; Oct 4, 2014 at 01:45 AM.
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:38 AM.