M275 V12 Bi-Turbo Platform Technical discussion relating to models sharing the M275 V12 Bi-Turbo (V12 TT). Including SL600, SL65 AMG, CL600, CL65 AMG, S600, S65 AMG.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

SL65/M275 Air Intake Systems compared

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Mar 28, 2026 | 05:33 PM
  #1  
mrvedit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 537
Likes: 116
From: Ann Arbor, MI
2004 SL600
SL65/M275 Air Intake Systems compared

There have been many discussions about how much the stock M275 air filter housing might be restricting performance.
Therefore I decided to build a less restrictive system and test it against the stock system in a repeatable setting with basic measuring equipment. While at it, I also wanted to test with direct plumbing and no air filters at all.
Here is my setup:
2004 SL600 with a 2006 AMG 6.0 M275 with a performance tune and no CATS.
Using the Torque Pro app which is built into my dash head unit and set to display Intake Manifold pressure, Intake temperature and Torque. It registers the max of each for easily comparisons.
Outside temp for all tests was around 40F, so pretty cool. Intake temp when I go WOT was typically around 90F, so barely warm.
Driving on an nearby highway entrance ramp. Traction control is off, shifter in 3. I go WOT at about 30 MPH and accelerate to highway+ speed.
The Torque Pro app shows much lower torque values than the factory claim of 725 lb/ft for a stock engine. First this is measuring wheel torque not engine torque. Still seems low. Not sure why, maybe because it uses GPS, partly because the entrance ramp is a bit up hill. It does not matter because we are interested in differences, not absolute values.
First is a stock air filter test, then a simpler air filter test, then a test with directly plumbing and no air filter. The latter was followed within a few minutes with another test with the stock air filters. Air filter MAP sensors were always installed.

Stock air filter setup:



Performance run a few days ago showed a max torque of 553.4 lb/ft and a max intake pressure of 27.7 PSI, subtracting ambient 14.0 pressure gives 13.7 PSI of boost.



My custom air filter setup consists of these parts. Tubing and filters are 2.5" with a reducer to the 2.25" at the turbo inlets.



On the engine, it looks like this:



Performance run a few days ago showed a max torque of 583.3 lb/ft and a max intake pressure of 30.2 PSI, subtracting ambient 14.0 pressure gives 16.2 PSI of boost.



Directly feeding air to the turbos looks like this. I don't see how this could be more direct. Again the tubing is 2.5" with a reducer to the 2.25" at the turbo inlets.



Performance today showed a max torque of 621.6 lb/ft and a max intake pressure of 32.5 PSI, subtracting ambient 14.0 pressure gives 18.5 PSI of boost.



I immediately swapped back to the stock filters, drove a few extra miles to reduce the intake temp back below 100F and tested again.
Performance with the stock air filters back in resulted in nearly the same as before: A max torque of 551 lb/ft and a max intake pressure of 28.9 PSI, subtracting ambient 14.0 pressure gives 14.9 PSI of boost.



Summary:
Obviously this is not an absolutely scientific test, but it supports the general belief that the stock air filters reduce performance. Since the before and after stock air filter runs were within 0.5% of each other, I think my methodology is reasonable.
Let me say that I could immediately feel the difference without the air filters. It felt like a different car, much bigger improvement than adding a tune.
The filter-less setup improved torque by 12.7%. My simple air filters improved torque by 5.5%.


The AMG M275 is rated for max boost of 22 PSI, but I have never seen more than 18.5 on either Torque Pro or the mechanical gauge I have inside the car. Not sure if true, but have heard that deleting CATs lets engine breath better and reduces necessary boost.
I have experimented with adjustments on the turbo wastegates. I think mine are a bit tighter than stock which should allow higher boost. I once tightened then a lot more but then got misfire codes and limp mode.
I once also tested with the stock air filter removed and the turbo inlets just open to the underhood air. Torque was 605 lb/ft with 18 psi boost; probably less than the no-filters setup today because it was sucking in hotter air.
I have ideas and parts for some other possible air intake systems, but they will have to wait.



Reply
Old Mar 28, 2026 | 07:50 PM
  #2  
JustTXn's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 247
Likes: 58
From: Fort Worth
2005 CL55 AMG || 2005 CL65 AMG || 1989 560SEC
Solid and straightforward test, reinforces what Fluid Motorunion found when tuning their customers' m275.

I don't think i've ever heard of anyone actually hitting the theoretical 22 PSI. I've heard some people mention there may be some boost leakage with the stock pressure-side (turbo outlet to intercooler) intake hose clamps, so they used t-bolt clamps instead. I bought four for funsies to replace, $13 on ebay.
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:23 PM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE