Autozeitung: ML63 vs. Cayenne Turbo S...
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 7
G55, SLS, smart eq
Autozeitung: ML63 vs. Cayenne Turbo S...
http://www.autozeitung.de/index.php?...detail&id=1793
ML wins 0-100 and 0-200 Km/h and handling. Porsche wins comfort.
The verdict is in: The ML is faster
Translated (somewhat) article: http://translate.google.com/translat...language_tools
ML wins 0-100 and 0-200 Km/h and handling. Porsche wins comfort.
The verdict is in: The ML is faster
Translated (somewhat) article: http://translate.google.com/translat...language_tools
Last edited by sprins; Jul 20, 2006 at 07:19 PM.
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Don't have a Mercedes right now...
Originally Posted by sprins
http://www.autozeitung.de/index.php?...detail&id=1793
ML wins 0-100 and 0-200 Km/h and handling. Porsche wins comfort.
The verdict is in: The ML is faster
Translated (somewhat) article: http://translate.google.com/translat...language_tools
ML wins 0-100 and 0-200 Km/h and handling. Porsche wins comfort.
The verdict is in: The ML is faster
Translated (somewhat) article: http://translate.google.com/translat...language_tools
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 7
G55, SLS, smart eq
I stand corrected (my german is mediocre):
The ML wins performance, comfort, pricing, carosserie and engine characteristics.
The Cayenne wins handling. Stragely, as it looses the track run and slalom run.
The ML wins performance, comfort, pricing, carosserie and engine characteristics.
The Cayenne wins handling. Stragely, as it looses the track run and slalom run.
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: California
SL500 /Porsche 997S/Porsche Cayenne Turbo
Originally Posted by sprins
I stand corrected (my german is mediocre):
The ML wins performance, comfort, pricing, carosserie and engine characteristics.
The Cayenne wins handling. Stragely, as it looses the track run and slalom run.
The ML wins performance, comfort, pricing, carosserie and engine characteristics.
The Cayenne wins handling. Stragely, as it looses the track run and slalom run.
It compared a ML63 and a Cayenne Turbo S. The results were that the ML63 was faster in straight line acceleration, but the Porsche handled better.
Slalom: ML63 58.7 km/h
Cayenne Turbo S 61.9 km/h WINNER
Braking (100 km/h to 0): ML63 37.3
Porsche Cayenne Turbo S 36.1 WINNER
Phil
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 1
From: L.A., CA
'08 M5, '10 Land Cruiser
Originally Posted by PhilS
Read it again. Here is what I got from the article:
It compared a ML63 and a Cayenne Turbo S. The results were that the ML63 was faster in straight line acceleration, but the Porsche handled better.
Slalom: ML63 58.7 km/h
Cayenne Turbo S 61.9 km/h WINNER
Braking (100 km/h to 0): ML63 37.3
Porsche Cayenne Turbo S 36.1 WINNER
Phil
It compared a ML63 and a Cayenne Turbo S. The results were that the ML63 was faster in straight line acceleration, but the Porsche handled better.
Slalom: ML63 58.7 km/h
Cayenne Turbo S 61.9 km/h WINNER
Braking (100 km/h to 0): ML63 37.3
Porsche Cayenne Turbo S 36.1 WINNER
Phil
Them two things are ridiculously fast.
ML gets to 120kmh in 6.9secs!
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 7
G55, SLS, smart eq
Originally Posted by PhilS
Slalom: ML63 58.7 km/h
Cayenne Turbo S 61.9 km/h WINNER
Cayenne Turbo S 61.9 km/h WINNER
However, the ML was faster around the track. So it's a bit more than 'that the ML63 was faster in straight line acceleration'
