ML63 AMG (W166) 2011 -2015 (Replaced by GLE63)

ML63 (166) vs ML63 (164)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-30-2019, 09:08 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
CptSteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2013 C63
ML63 (166) vs ML63 (164)

Hi guys,

I’m new to the MB world and currently own a X5 - looking to purchase my first AMG and have always lived the look of the w164 ML63s..unfortunately my finances weren’t so great a few years back which is why I settled for the x5..fast forward a few years and I’m now keen to get an ML63..

I’m kinda torn of whether to get an ML63 (164) or bite the bullet and get a ML63 (166). I like the power of the TT, but tbh TT engines kinda scare me and the horror stories surrounding the reliability issues of the 166 scare the hell outta me and also the head bolt issue on the 164’s.

From a purely reliability perspective which is the better buy? I don’t mind spending the extra on a 166 but dont want to run the risk of turbo issues forcing me to spend a further 15k+ to fix the car...shape wise I think both are great and (tbh) prefer the boxier look of the 164s..

I would appreciate any input from owners who have owned both cars and can supply reasons as to why they prefer one over the other.

My main focus is reliability and also driveability.

Many thanks
Steve
Old 06-30-2019, 08:02 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
mdotk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 56
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
2014 ML63s
What are these W166 TT reliability issues you speak of?
The W164 is like driving a tank compared to the W166.
Old 07-01-2019, 10:27 AM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
CptSteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2013 C63
Originally Posted by mdotk
What are these W166 TT reliability issues you speak of?
The W164 is like driving a tank compared to the W166.
I thought the TT models were prone to some coolant pipe (clip?) issue - I dont know where I read people complaining about reliability on the TT models - maybe I am completely mistaken also?

When you say tank you mean feels big and clunky or are you saying the w164 is safer?

Thanks
Steve
Old 07-01-2019, 07:53 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
mdotk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 56
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
2014 ML63s
Originally Posted by CptSteve
I thought the TT models were prone to some coolant pipe (clip?) issue - I dont know where I read people complaining about reliability on the TT models - maybe I am completely mistaken also?

When you say tank you mean feels big and clunky or are you saying the w164 is safer?

Thanks
Steve
Do you have any other threads about that TT issue?

Good point - by tank I mean clunky! Although the conservative mode is a bit sluggish I find vs the 164. Sport is where it's at.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: ML63 (166) vs ML63 (164)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:24 AM.