Anyone else prefer the pre-LCI headlamps?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Anyone else prefer the pre-LCI headlamps?
In my eyes, the headlamps on the 2014-17 sedan S-class gave the car a stronger presence on the road. In pictures the new 2018 headlamps look great, but in person they appear smaller and more feminine-looking with the 3 LED "eyelashes". From the front view the car appears to have a weaker presence than before. What do you think?
#2
Diasgree. I find the 3 torch design more elegant and more fitting to the overall design language of the car. It also complements the other changes made to the grill and the front bumper ( particularly w sport package)
In my eyes, the headlamps on the 2014-17 sedan S-class gave the car a stronger presence on the road. In pictures the new 2018 headlamps look great, but in person they appear smaller and more feminine-looking with the 3 LED "eyelashes". From the front view the car appears to have a weaker presence than before. What do you think?
#3
Senior Member
In my eyes, the headlamps on the 2014-17 sedan S-class gave the car a stronger presence on the road. In pictures the new 2018 headlamps look great, but in person they appear smaller and more feminine-looking with the 3 LED "eyelashes". From the front view the car appears to have a weaker presence than before. What do you think?
#4
MBWorld God!
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: on my way
Posts: 30,687
Received 3,419 Likes
on
2,857 Posts
2012 CLS63
Pictures to compare?
#6
Junior Member
not arguing if they look good or not as it’s only opinion. However many complained that the more expensive cars looked too much like the cheaper ones. MB has tried to simplify and clean up the entire lineup. From the name of their cars to start. As for headlights and tailights it’s now changed to the following. One led stripe in headlamp and tail lamp for C-class. Two for the E-class and three for the s-class. I read they got the idea from military uniforms as the higher the rank the more stripes you have.
#7
Super Member
i think - based on the photos jumpman726 put up above - the pre-lci (facelift) looks sleeker to my eye whilst the new refresh (2018+) looks boxier.
Trending Topics
#9
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 10,122
Received 3,336 Likes
on
2,061 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
I have seen both models side by side several times and the older design is definitely more elegant. With the W221, the facelift headlights were a nice visual step up, on the W222 it is not.
This is partly due to the fact that the new headlights are single versus dual lights and pushed into the outer corners. The balance between width of the grill and headlights are just out of balance. Besides that, the technology of the new lights is superior, at least in the rest of the world.
In regards to the eyebrows, as stated by then OP, it is a direct response of people whining that the S class looked to similar to a C class from afar. I always thought that was a non-issue...
This is partly due to the fact that the new headlights are single versus dual lights and pushed into the outer corners. The balance between width of the grill and headlights are just out of balance. Besides that, the technology of the new lights is superior, at least in the rest of the world.
In regards to the eyebrows, as stated by then OP, it is a direct response of people whining that the S class looked to similar to a C class from afar. I always thought that was a non-issue...
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 4,337
Received 1,026 Likes
on
744 Posts
2010 E350 4Matic
I have seen both models side by side several times and the older design is definitely more elegant. With the W221, the facelift headlights were a nice visual step up, on the W222 it is not.
This is partly due to the fact that the new headlights are single versus dual lights and pushed into the outer corners. The balance between width of the grill and headlights are just out of balance. Besides that, the technology of the new lights is superior, at least in the rest of the world.
In regards to the eyebrows, as stated by then OP, it is a direct response of people whining that the S class looked to similar to a C class from afar. I always thought that was a non-issue...
This is partly due to the fact that the new headlights are single versus dual lights and pushed into the outer corners. The balance between width of the grill and headlights are just out of balance. Besides that, the technology of the new lights is superior, at least in the rest of the world.
In regards to the eyebrows, as stated by then OP, it is a direct response of people whining that the S class looked to similar to a C class from afar. I always thought that was a non-issue...
#13
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 10,122
Received 3,336 Likes
on
2,061 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
Since facelifts in most cases means no changes in the sheet metal, there is only so much they can do to freshen up the look and entice people to go out and spend more money
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
I don’t think they changed the headlights to specifically differentiate the S class, as in 1 = C, 2 = E, 3 = S. Because if that was their intention then they would have changed the S Coupe’s headlights to match.
#16
Junior Member
Also coupes look very different. Not needed to look different between models
#17
Member
Thread Starter
Just what I read from a Mercedes magazine. Not sure if it’s accurate. Also the redesign of the headlight had to happen due to the new technology in the update. However they didn’t have to add two in the Eclass and three in the Sclass and keep the class at one. So I believe it.
Also coupes look very different. Not needed to look different between models
Also coupes look very different. Not needed to look different between models
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 2000 ft over the Fl coast in a B-17
Posts: 5,824
Received 260 Likes
on
186 Posts
As I stated earlier, it's better to judge these kinds of things in the flesh. Pics just don't give the proper perspective sometimes. Ever see/know of someone who doesn't photograph well, yet looks fine in real life...happens all the time. Has anyone here even seen this car up close and personal?
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
I have. I just came back from Tokyo and they are all over the place... They are pretty much everywhere. I have seen S400-S63 on the road and I saw an S63 up close and personal while leaving the day I checked out the hotel. I don’t know if it’s just the headlights but the new S63 has more of a presence than the pre-LCI. It’s a subtle change but now that the S has a more distinct look, it seems more desirable than the pre-LCI IMO.
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 2000 ft over the Fl coast in a B-17
Posts: 5,824
Received 260 Likes
on
186 Posts
I have. I just came back from Tokyo and they are all over the place... They are pretty much everywhere. I have seen S400-S63 on the road and I saw an S63 up close and personal while leaving the day I checked out the hotel. I don’t know if it’s just the headlights but the new S63 has more of a presence than the pre-LCI. It’s a subtle change but now that the S has a more distinct look, it seems more desirable than the pre-LCI IMO.
#21
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 10,122
Received 3,336 Likes
on
2,061 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
A quick walk into any deanship will answer that question as they likely have some leftover S550's next to a new S450/560 in the showroom.
I agree that the S-Class has more presence but don't attribute that to the headlights. The grill looks more dominant as you have the wider slats (this used to be the S600 grill). The bigger difference is the more aggressive front bumper, both on the Sport package and more pronounced, the AMG bumper.
That said, the headlights look good in the flesh but just not as nice as before. Matter of taste. Interesting fo me was that my wife remarked on it without me pointing it out...
I agree that the S-Class has more presence but don't attribute that to the headlights. The grill looks more dominant as you have the wider slats (this used to be the S600 grill). The bigger difference is the more aggressive front bumper, both on the Sport package and more pronounced, the AMG bumper.
That said, the headlights look good in the flesh but just not as nice as before. Matter of taste. Interesting fo me was that my wife remarked on it without me pointing it out...
#23
I prefer the previous front end design.The lower valence and rub strip are sculpted with elegant contours and integration on the AMG trim package.The 18 is straight across with a continuous rub strip.Also,think the smaller lower intakes are better scaled to the overall composition on the 14-17.Just my opinion.
#24
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Corona Del Mar, CA
Posts: 7,447
Received 3,745 Likes
on
2,140 Posts
2020 S560 Sedan, 2019 SL450, 2019 E450 Luxury Trim Wagon, '24 BMW I7 on order...
#25
Super Moderator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 10,122
Received 3,336 Likes
on
2,061 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
We are currently on a little road trip and on the way, we spotted an auto carrier full of new E300 sedans. My wife, who drives a 2016 E350 sedan commented “I don’t like it! It looks like an S Class wannbe!” I was amazed, as I never thought she paid any attention to the model changes. I’d like her to get a new E400 sedan or wagon, but she says she wants to keep her current car. Oh well.
More power to your wife I believe you have a nicely upgraded E-Class or is she driving the S?