kleemann or hps?
.............I just saw the post. Even at that, it shows that the CLK55K is a tad slower to reach the quatermile compared to w21E55. (12.42 vs 12.4). Even you decide that the numbers are the same, the biggest suprise to most is how damn fast the E55 is. Because ordinarily, you would not have even thought that a stock E55 can do that. Then if you consider the difference in price, the E55 becomes an even better bargain. Yes the CLK55K "feels" faster but it is not faster. With the E55, you can be going very fast but not feel it. I don't neccessarily prefer this, but the car is damn fast.
Ted
Even you decide that the numbers are the same, the biggest suprise to most is how damn fast the E55 is.
Ted
HPS= 8000.00 installed. Benzmac quoted me 16500.00 installed for Kleeman. So how are my prices off?-MOE
As you can see from Sleestacks posts a clk55k does 12.415 in 1/4 time and you're saying that a W211 55 will outperform a na 55 engine?
.............I just saw the post. Even at that, it shows that the CLK55K is a tad slower to reach the quatermile compared to w21E55. (12.42 vs 12.4). Even you decide that the numbers are the same, the biggest suprise to most is how damn fast the E55 is. Because ordinarily, you would not have even thought that a stock E55 can do that. Then if you consider the difference in price, the E55 becomes an even better bargain. Yes the CLK55K "feels" faster but it is not faster. With the E55, you can be going very fast but not feel it. I don't neccessarily prefer this, but the car is damn fast.
Ted
Based on theoreticals?
Are you still stuck driving a 6 banger?
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Sorry even though i find this hard to believe guess it just depends on the driver of each car.
Notice I used the future tense... and yes, for the time being (although not for long), based on assumptions (I don't think theoreticals is even a noun). I think the assumptions are pretty sound... bigger engine, better parts, bigger displacement supercharger, lighter overall weight, stiffer chassis, custom suspension, wider wheels and tuned ECU.
Are you still stuck driving a 6 banger?
Well remember, James Cannon is running a N/A E55 with a renntech s/c and it runs faster than the W211 E55, so it is possible.
Ted
..........I imagine that if you put an F-16 engine in your Na AMG55 it will probably fly. Everything is possible if you have the money. My point is that at only $76K, the new W211 E55 is a bargain and outperforms pretty much everything out there except the most extreme machines such as Sleestacks upcoming car. But by the time you get your car to the level of a W211 E55 or better, you would have spent a small fortune.
Ted
..........I imagine that if you put an F-16 engine in your Na AMG55 it will probably fly. Everything is possible if you have the money. My point is that at only $76K, the new W211 E55 is a bargain and outperforms pretty much everything out there except the most extreme machines such as Sleestacks upcoming car. But by the time you get your car to the level of a W211 E55 or better, you would have spent a small fortune.
Ted
They're both fast, expensive and great cars. The difference between 12.4 and 12.42 is a rounded number. They both have traction issues and could be helped by some wider rubber. In the end, they're both going to get spanked by my CLK.
Your car may be a straight line rocket, but after the first set of corners I will just wave bye, bye in my C43.
Jeff
Sleestack says:
They're both fast, expensive and great cars. The difference between 12.4 and 12.42 is a rounded number. They both have traction issues and could be helped by some wider rubber. In the end, they're both going to get spanked by my CLK.
Your car may be a straight line rocket, but after the first set of corners I will just wave bye, bye in my C43.
Jeff
Sleestack says:
They're both fast, expensive and great cars. The difference between 12.4 and 12.42 is a rounded number. They both have traction issues and could be helped by some wider rubber. In the end, they're both going to get spanked by my CLK.
Your car may be a straight line rocket, but after the first set of corners I will just wave bye, bye in my C43.
Jeff
Last edited by Sleestack; Sep 11, 2003 at 03:48 PM.
I still will have a better chassis so make sure your helmet is strapped on tight when I come by.
Jeff
Sleestack says;
Well 700 Hp is a lot of Hp but is will only be good for 1 sec or so at a track. So really not a hugh deal. My car already has all of chassis stuff that your wanting to add to yours plus more stuff. But no roll cage. I do have chassis stiffening bars. And I have the advantage of already driving mine.
I still will have a better chassis so make sure your helmet is strapped on tight when I come by.
Jeff
I don't live too far from Sacramentp, so if you would like to check out the CLK when it gets back, I'd be glad to meet up with you.
Last edited by Sleestack; Sep 11, 2003 at 04:47 PM.
But my suspesion setup is far more advanced than the Kleeman shock and springs and I have custom sway bars and other parts to achieve handling beyond the normal. I know for certain that the Kleeman springs are not stiff enough to really hold the car from roll induced camber changes that kill traction through long corners.
I also have very big nonstock brakes.
At Willow Springs the thing that makes for a very fast lap is corner speed. I don't think your 700 Hp will be enough to catch me if I can come out of turn 9, 10mph faster, plus I have hundreds of laps there on my Superbikes mostly with lap times of 1min 22-23 sec.
Anyhow it would be fun to meet at the track.
Jeff.






