Performance Upgrades & Tuning Discuss general performance and tuning enhancements for your Mercedes-Benz.

Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Supersprint

Evosport V6 and V8 Performance Ignition Stages I and II

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-17-2004, 05:32 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
BryBenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: mercer island, seattle
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by nov0798
the only way to increase voltage to the plug is to introduce a higher primary voltage in the coil.
"Evosport nology Ignition wires use capacitor to accumulate the energy from ignition coil until the voltage at the spark plug electrodes reaches the ionization point. At that split second point the entire power of the stored spark is discharged at once, creating a spark 300 times more powerful. The result is faster, more complete combustion, and most importantly, MORE HORSEPOWER",quote from the website.
Old 03-17-2004, 05:42 PM
  #27  
Super Member
 
levelr123g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
beleive what you want. nology=junk.
if it were that easy, everyone would do it, if it created so much hp then evryone would do it. I have had the oppurtunity to mess with nology, they are junk.
Old 03-17-2004, 05:47 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
BryBenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: mercer island, seattle
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they are not ordinary wires but with built-in capacitor, I use them in my NSX for race purpose and they are the best, I cant find better one. and YES, the car r much faster than with stock wire.



Last edited by BryBenz; 03-17-2004 at 05:54 PM.
Old 03-17-2004, 05:48 PM
  #29  
Out Of Control!!
Thread Starter
 
Mach430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 35,855
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
If the plug is cleaner, there are no deposits on either electrode, making it easier to fire, as electrical current will always choose the path of the least resistance. Deposits will increase the resistance necessary to jump the air gap, especially if they build up on the sharp edges of the electrodes. Changing plugs and wires helps this. We have seen a reduction in as much of 3,000 ohms of resistance in 1 OEM wire vs an aftermarket wire.

As I have stated, we have seen consistant gains on our C32, as well as others who installed simliar upgrades in their C32 Stage II package. The fact of the matter is, they work; pure and simple. Virtually every car with plug wires has an aftermarket upgrade available for them. Why would it work on most cars, but not Mercedes? Again, we have seen firsthand that they do.

I will try to participate more in the technicalities of this debate later, however I currently do not have the time necessary.

Thanks,

Ben

**EDIT** Those are not our wires above. There is no capacitor, nor is their room for a capacitor, in our Mercedes wires.
Old 03-17-2004, 05:50 PM
  #30  
Member
 
cschow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 Corvette Coupe
Again, the disclaimers in my original post apply, I'm not trying to criticize anyone, I'm just trying to get a better understanding of the upgrade. That said, IMHO "until the voltage at the spark plug electrodes reaches the ionization point" is the key phrase.

The spark forms as a function of the gap distance and the properties of the air-fuel mixture within the gap. Introduction of a capacitor will accumulate charge on the capacitor while increasing the voltage difference across the plates of the capacitor, but when the capacitor is coupled to the spark plug, the spark forms as soon as the voltage between the two parts of the spark plug reaches the ionization point of the air-fuel mixture spanning the gap.

The spark might last longer due to the charge stored on the capacitor which will continue to flow so long as the voltage at the two parts of the plug remains at the ionization point.

The spark, which is hot plasma, will cause the air-fuel in the direct vincinity of the spark to combust, and then combustion radiate from the point of initial combusion based on the pressure of the air-fuel mixture in the between the cylinder and the head. So here's the question: what good is would be sustaining the spark any longer than the minimum amount of time required to start the initial combustion. True, the spark will radiate -some- heat, but I have to guess that the combusion speed of reaction radiating outward from the initial reaction is so fast that any additional heating from the extended spark would do nothing. Moreover, as the air-fuel in the direct area of the spark is already combusting, extending the spark would not seem to do any additional power generation there.
Old 03-17-2004, 07:16 PM
  #31  
Super Member
 
levelr123g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
also, you only need high initial voltage to start the spark, once it is started the voltage requirements fall dramatically.

also I am NOT trying to flame evosport at all, i have their pullies on my c320 and love them.

if you read mach430's post you will clearly see where he continues to state improvements on a c32, A SUPERCHARGED CAR! of course you will probably see improvement s on a force induced car. as for the validity of this who knows. the only way to see improvements is if the voltage out of the coil is higher. since you havent changed the voltage in to the coil then you wont have any extra voltage out of the coil. so i dont see how you can have any improvemnets.
Old 03-18-2004, 04:21 PM
  #32  
Out Of Control!!
Thread Starter
 
Mach430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 35,855
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Unfortunately, while automobile engineers have been doing this for 30+ years, there will never be a 100% agreement w/ any modiciation. I think our reputation should speak for itself, in that we don't produce, or even carry, performance upgrades that do not perform as we state; it's just not our philosophy.

Will an ignition upgrade work better on a forced-induction car? Yes.

Please understand, this is not some new technological break-through that we are trying to sell to the world. We have merely released a product, that has been proven on virtually any other car where performance upgrades can be found, into the Mercedes market--just as we did with our underdrive pulleys.

A highly tuned car WILL BENEFIT MORE from our ignition upgrade than a stock car. The reason we havenot provided dyno numbers on stock cars is because we believe in selling & purchasing items at the greatest value first. A naturally-aspirated motor will stand to benefit more from our underdrive pulleys and software than just our ignition upgrade. Therefore, in my opinion, it would be wrong of us to recommend that they spend more on our ignition upgrade prior to those. BUT, all cars stand to benefit from this upgrade; stock, street, or track. These are not F1 motors we are working with. There are plenty of inefficienes in the system that can be modified and benefited by reducing.

As I previously stated, the degree of benefit varies depending on the motor, modifications, octane, etc... If you are not sure whether this is the upgrade that you should choose next for your car, ask!

Thanks,

Ben
Old 03-18-2004, 09:27 PM
  #33  
Newbie
 
audi 1.8t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Mach430

Will an ignition upgrade work better on a forced-induction car? Yes.
From my basic point of veiw. Lets say I put a charger or a turbo on a 10:1 compression motor. At six/seven PSI.
One would put 2 heat rang cooler plugs in to help out with the war with heat.

The point of veiw that compression wants to put the candle out is true.

I am also impressed that this system on a C32 could make 9HP. I am impressed because the intercooler under that charger could be better and the one under the 55 motors needs to be a lot better. If one wants to flame me because of my last statement. Create a new thread. Your are not the only one that has intercooler problems lets see here WRX. Just thank God that Mercedes dumped Eaton.

To sum up my crazy run of thought. A hotter spark could be a war for a cooler result. LOL

Last edited by audi 1.8t; 03-18-2004 at 10:47 PM.
Old 03-19-2004, 11:46 PM
  #34  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
nukblazi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Abingdon, MD
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am feeling left out here. Why no Staged upgrade path from EvoSport for the M111 C Coupe?
Old 03-20-2004, 01:17 AM
  #35  
Out Of Control!!
Thread Starter
 
Mach430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 35,855
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Don't feel left out just yet. If you can find out what letters your wires are labeled, I probably have a set available for you.

Thanks,

Ben
Old 03-20-2004, 11:18 AM
  #36  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
nukblazi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Abingdon, MD
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could you email me what numbers you need?

Off the spark plug wires themselves?



Kleemann alloy pulley
LTW flywheel + 7 HP over stock
Upsolute tuning

What could I expect to see gain wise? Just looking for an estimate.

Also, do you have the ltw accessory pulley kit for the '02 cl203?

Also, what the cost of 264 shricks? Want to keep it streetable.


You never returned my emails about the Koni's, and Brad never got back to me, etc. Please follow up Ben. Thank you!
Old 03-22-2004, 02:07 PM
  #37  
Out Of Control!!
Thread Starter
 
Mach430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 35,855
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Email Sent
Old 03-23-2004, 08:34 PM
  #38  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
nukblazi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Abingdon, MD
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thank you sir!
Old 03-28-2004, 03:33 AM
  #39  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Alexbenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Posts: 5,622
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sean's Sister--
anything for 96,97 models?
Old 03-28-2004, 06:34 AM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
AMG///Merc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Oxford, Pa
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
03 CLK55
Since there are some experts here on ignition...

I'd be curious as to what you think of this idea... (By the way, my post introduction was 100% genuine, and not sarcastic at all!) From what I've read, part of the problem with early flame propogation is the spark plug"ground" (For lack of the proper terminology) that "blocks" some of the air/fuel mixture. I would assume that if this is true, the problem must be worse with these newer twin, and even quadruple ground spark plugs. If this IS true, I have an idea that would eliminate this problem entirely. My idea, is to have a very hard wearing "ground" embedded in the piston itself. As the piston nears top dead center, and the ground approaches the plug, the plug would fire, and there would be a true 360 degree flame kernel. This is assuming of course that the ground would be both long enough to close the necessary gap, yet short enough not to contact the cylinder head. Obviously the problem would be worse with the more ignition advance there is, as the piston would be further away from TDC, and the gap would obviously be greater. I figure that durability and fouling really shouldn't be a problem. If 100,000 mile spark plugs are the norm now, surely they could incorporate a 300,000 mile "piston". My guess is that it's either just not enough of a benefit to justify the cost, and/orthe problem with ignition advance. All the same, any thoughts or input would be appreciated!!



Best regards,
Matt
Old 03-28-2004, 09:51 AM
  #41  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
Brandon @ Kleemann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Matt-

What you are talking about was pioneered and introduced by SAAB in 1995 in the 9.3, and continues is some degree with SAABs SCC concept engines with Orbital. I dont know if you are really suggesting an over the counter upgrade or not- but it would be nearly impossible to retrofit the technology to a MB. The pistons in a variable spark engine are very unique in shape and are typically seen with a centralized plug location. Forget the fact that the engine management would have to change as well.

Nukblazi-

M111 does not have spark plug wires. Individual coils are mounted over each plug which resides in a deep well due to the twin cam 16 valve design of the head. The "wire" is essentially the plug boot which is directly mounted to the coil pack.
Old 04-03-2004, 08:30 PM
  #42  
Super Member
 
levelr123g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well if you are worried about the ground electrode, cut it off. the plug will still fire and run with the ground removed.
Old 04-04-2004, 09:53 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
Finnish C32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W211 E55AMG
http://www.magnecor.co.uk/ look in here. especially FAQ
Old 04-24-2004, 11:05 AM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
AMG///Merc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Oxford, Pa
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
03 CLK55
Oh no, I definitely meant that as OEM and not as a retrofit...

Originally posted by KLEEMANN
Matt-

What you are talking about was pioneered and introduced by SAAB in 1995 in the 9.3, and continues is some degree with SAABs SCC concept engines with Orbital. I dont know if you are really suggesting an over the counter upgrade or not- but it would be nearly impossible to retrofit the technology to a MB. The pistons in a variable spark engine are very unique in shape and are typically seen with a centralized plug location. Forget the fact that the engine management would have to change as well.

Nukblazi-

M111 does not have spark plug wires. Individual coils are mounted over each plug which resides in a deep well due to the twin cam 16 valve design of the head. The "wire" is essentially the plug boot which is directly mounted to the coil pack.
Noyt only would that be extremely expensive and difficult as a retrofit as you mentioned, the benefits would surely not be enough to justify the trouble!! Thanks for telling me about SAAB! It's kind of cool to hear that an idea that you thought of has actually been done before! A couple other ideas that I came up with that I later discovered were actually done before...

Disc valves... I got the idea from a parmaesan (sp?) cheese can. I figured that you could allow much higher rpm because of no reciprocating valves. I figured that two overlapping discs would allow variations in duration...

"Afterburner" turbochargers... squirting a little bit of fuel into the exhaust ports to speed up the exhaust turbine at low-boost/off throttle applications (Mainly for a race car)

Forced induction by compressed air created from regenerative braking (Experimented with by McLaren F1, and I still think there's allot of potential there, as well as other regenerative braking concepts)

Anyway, I'm not trying to brag or anything, but having no engineering background or college education, I was a little proud to read that these ideas have all been tried before...


Best regards,
Matt
Old 04-25-2004, 03:48 PM
  #45  
Super Member
 
m444's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Silicon valley
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Audi C7.5 S6
Racers, for years, have indexed spark plugs, marking them and using shims, to make sure the ground terminal is not shielding the spark. It gives a little power increase, but not worth the effort for most srtreet cars.

Most spark plug wire should be replaced at 40k-60k, for best performance. The question is, taking out the old wires and replacing with stock vs aftermarket wires, how much difference is there.

For maximum performance and timming advance, when adding boost to an engine, the plugs should be one step colder.

For best performance replace the plugs, every 6k to 10k miles, it may give a small boost, usually not worth it.

Last edited by m444; 04-25-2004 at 03:51 PM.
Old 05-30-2004, 12:55 PM
  #46  
Super Member
 
levelr123g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so where are you with your upgrade???

i assume since we haven't heard anything, its probably not going well. I assume the benefits dont outweigh the costs for you.
Old 08-06-2004, 11:51 AM
  #47  
Member
 
AolHoward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SoCal & Taiwan
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK430
anybody has this installed on their car ??
Old 08-06-2004, 08:26 PM
  #48  
Out Of Control!!
 
blackbenzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 13,487
Received 94 Likes on 77 Posts
haters crazy
Is stage II ready yet?????????
Old 08-07-2004, 11:14 AM
  #49  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
hubert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 2,159
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
14'G63 AMG ,1994 Mercedes E500, 2020 Range Rover HST
I heve the stage I upgrade but it's just thicker cables 8mm and colder sparks and haven't heard about stage II yet.
Old 08-09-2004, 12:03 AM
  #50  
Super Member
 
levelr123g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
most likely the results arent that great thats why they disappeared when i challenged them. If you want larger wires, contact magnecor and go to your autoparts store and buy plugs from them. the 2 together would be cheaper then evilsports mega buck upgrade.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: Evosport V6 and V8 Performance Ignition Stages I and II



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:53 AM.