Evosport V6 and V8 Performance Ignition Stages I and II
the only way to increase voltage to the plug is to introduce a higher primary voltage in the coil.
Last edited by BryBenz; Mar 17, 2004 at 05:54 PM.
As I have stated, we have seen consistant gains on our C32, as well as others who installed simliar upgrades in their C32 Stage II package. The fact of the matter is, they work; pure and simple. Virtually every car with plug wires has an aftermarket upgrade available for them. Why would it work on most cars, but not Mercedes? Again, we have seen firsthand that they do.
I will try to participate more in the technicalities of this debate later, however I currently do not have the time necessary.
Thanks,
Ben
**EDIT** Those are not our wires above. There is no capacitor, nor is their room for a capacitor, in our Mercedes wires.
The spark forms as a function of the gap distance and the properties of the air-fuel mixture within the gap. Introduction of a capacitor will accumulate charge on the capacitor while increasing the voltage difference across the plates of the capacitor, but when the capacitor is coupled to the spark plug, the spark forms as soon as the voltage between the two parts of the spark plug reaches the ionization point of the air-fuel mixture spanning the gap.
The spark might last longer due to the charge stored on the capacitor which will continue to flow so long as the voltage at the two parts of the plug remains at the ionization point.
The spark, which is hot plasma, will cause the air-fuel in the direct vincinity of the spark to combust, and then combustion radiate from the point of initial combusion based on the pressure of the air-fuel mixture in the between the cylinder and the head. So here's the question: what good is would be sustaining the spark any longer than the minimum amount of time required to start the initial combustion. True, the spark will radiate -some- heat, but I have to guess that the combusion speed of reaction radiating outward from the initial reaction is so fast that any additional heating from the extended spark would do nothing. Moreover, as the air-fuel in the direct area of the spark is already combusting, extending the spark would not seem to do any additional power generation there.
also I am NOT trying to flame evosport at all, i have their pullies on my c320 and love them.
if you read mach430's post you will clearly see where he continues to state improvements on a c32, A SUPERCHARGED CAR! of course you will probably see improvement s on a force induced car. as for the validity of this who knows. the only way to see improvements is if the voltage out of the coil is higher. since you havent changed the voltage in to the coil then you wont have any extra voltage out of the coil. so i dont see how you can have any improvemnets.
Will an ignition upgrade work better on a forced-induction car? Yes.
Please understand, this is not some new technological break-through that we are trying to sell to the world. We have merely released a product, that has been proven on virtually any other car where performance upgrades can be found, into the Mercedes market--just as we did with our underdrive pulleys.
A highly tuned car WILL BENEFIT MORE from our ignition upgrade than a stock car. The reason we havenot provided dyno numbers on stock cars is because we believe in selling & purchasing items at the greatest value first. A naturally-aspirated motor will stand to benefit more from our underdrive pulleys and software than just our ignition upgrade. Therefore, in my opinion, it would be wrong of us to recommend that they spend more on our ignition upgrade prior to those. BUT, all cars stand to benefit from this upgrade; stock, street, or track. These are not F1 motors we are working with. There are plenty of inefficienes in the system that can be modified and benefited by reducing.
As I previously stated, the degree of benefit varies depending on the motor, modifications, octane, etc... If you are not sure whether this is the upgrade that you should choose next for your car, ask!
Thanks,
Ben
Will an ignition upgrade work better on a forced-induction car? Yes.
One would put 2 heat rang cooler plugs in to help out with the war with heat.
The point of veiw that compression wants to put the candle out is true.
I am also impressed that this system on a C32 could make 9HP. I am impressed because the intercooler under that charger could be better and the one under the 55 motors needs to be a lot better. If one wants to flame me because of my last statement. Create a new thread. Your are not the only one that has intercooler problems lets see here WRX. Just thank God that Mercedes dumped Eaton.
To sum up my crazy run of thought. A hotter spark could be a war for a cooler result. LOL
Last edited by audi 1.8t; Mar 18, 2004 at 10:47 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Off the spark plug wires themselves?
Kleemann alloy pulley
LTW flywheel + 7 HP over stock
Upsolute tuning
What could I expect to see gain wise? Just looking for an estimate.
Also, do you have the ltw accessory pulley kit for the '02 cl203?
Also, what the cost of 264 shricks? Want to keep it streetable.
You never returned my emails about the Koni's, and Brad never got back to me, etc. Please follow up Ben. Thank you!
Best regards,
Matt
What you are talking about was pioneered and introduced by SAAB in 1995 in the 9.3, and continues is some degree with SAABs SCC concept engines with Orbital. I dont know if you are really suggesting an over the counter upgrade or not- but it would be nearly impossible to retrofit the technology to a MB. The pistons in a variable spark engine are very unique in shape and are typically seen with a centralized plug location. Forget the fact that the engine management would have to change as well.
Nukblazi-
M111 does not have spark plug wires. Individual coils are mounted over each plug which resides in a deep well due to the twin cam 16 valve design of the head. The "wire" is essentially the plug boot which is directly mounted to the coil pack.
Matt-
What you are talking about was pioneered and introduced by SAAB in 1995 in the 9.3, and continues is some degree with SAABs SCC concept engines with Orbital. I dont know if you are really suggesting an over the counter upgrade or not- but it would be nearly impossible to retrofit the technology to a MB. The pistons in a variable spark engine are very unique in shape and are typically seen with a centralized plug location. Forget the fact that the engine management would have to change as well.
Nukblazi-
M111 does not have spark plug wires. Individual coils are mounted over each plug which resides in a deep well due to the twin cam 16 valve design of the head. The "wire" is essentially the plug boot which is directly mounted to the coil pack.
Disc valves... I got the idea from a parmaesan (sp?) cheese can. I figured that you could allow much higher rpm because of no reciprocating valves. I figured that two overlapping discs would allow variations in duration...
"Afterburner" turbochargers... squirting a little bit of fuel into the exhaust ports to speed up the exhaust turbine at low-boost/off throttle applications (Mainly for a race car)
Forced induction by compressed air created from regenerative braking (Experimented with by McLaren F1, and I still think there's allot of potential there, as well as other regenerative braking concepts)
Anyway, I'm not trying to brag or anything, but having no engineering background or college education, I was a little proud to read that these ideas have all been tried before...
Best regards,
Matt
Most spark plug wire should be replaced at 40k-60k, for best performance. The question is, taking out the old wires and replacing with stock vs aftermarket wires, how much difference is there.
For maximum performance and timming advance, when adding boost to an engine, the plugs should be one step colder.
For best performance replace the plugs, every 6k to 10k miles, it may give a small boost, usually not worth it.
Last edited by m444; Apr 25, 2004 at 03:51 PM.



thank you sir!



