Powerchip
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLK500
Powerchip
Has anybody had some good experience or comments on the Powerchip 93 Gold?? Looking to install on 2003 CLK500. Has anybody had problems after the install??
All remarks welcome!!
All remarks welcome!!
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: SFV, Ca.
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
W210, W220, W163, W164, C6
I've ran both software files 91 & 93 PC...is there a difference in power-pull? My buttdyno says yes, but not huge! Along with the increase in gas prices ( Unocal 76 100 octane @ $5.95 a gallon) even octane boost additives (I tend to use VP Racing fuels C5 @ $15) it's become a pricey investment. At the moment I opt to use the 91 version and occasional fill up on the 100 octane specially on warm days here in the valley area were the ECU will pull xtra timing. On a side note, Powerchip has provided me outstanding customer service...I believe this is a key element when purchasing software tuning products, issues may arise...and both Joel & Jessie returns messages promptly, even provides their cell# just in case the unexpected happens.
Last edited by Richard Galing; 04-07-2004 at 03:32 AM.
#4
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: santa barbara calif.
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2004 clk500 coupe
vp fuel
Originally posted by Richard023
I've ran both software files 91 & 93 PC...is there a difference in power-pull? My buttdyno says yes, but not huge! Along with the increase in gas prices ( Unocal 76 100 octane @ $5.95 a gallon) even octane boost additives (I tend to use VP Racing fuels C5 @ $15) it's become a pricey investment. At the moment I opt to use the 91 version and occasional fill up on the 100 octane specially on warm days here in the valley area were the ECU will pull xtra timing. On a side note, Powerchip has provided me outstanding customer service...I believe this is a key element when purchasing software tuning products, issues may arise...and both Joel & Jessie returns messages promptly, even provides their cell# just in case the unexpected happens.
I've ran both software files 91 & 93 PC...is there a difference in power-pull? My buttdyno says yes, but not huge! Along with the increase in gas prices ( Unocal 76 100 octane @ $5.95 a gallon) even octane boost additives (I tend to use VP Racing fuels C5 @ $15) it's become a pricey investment. At the moment I opt to use the 91 version and occasional fill up on the 100 octane specially on warm days here in the valley area were the ECU will pull xtra timing. On a side note, Powerchip has provided me outstanding customer service...I believe this is a key element when purchasing software tuning products, issues may arise...and both Joel & Jessie returns messages promptly, even provides their cell# just in case the unexpected happens.
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: SFV, Ca.
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
W210, W220, W163, W164, C6
Re: vp fuel
Originally posted by clkguy
i have been using VP performance unleaded at 100 octane and currently use the motorsport 103, both fuels oxygenated and o2 sensor and catalyst friendly,i buy in 55gal drum at $5 a gallon,have no data on current VP spec sheet about c5,can you provide info on this fuel,just wondering but would not consider a &15 gallon of any fuel,do you run this fuel 100% or mix?
i have been using VP performance unleaded at 100 octane and currently use the motorsport 103, both fuels oxygenated and o2 sensor and catalyst friendly,i buy in 55gal drum at $5 a gallon,have no data on current VP spec sheet about c5,can you provide info on this fuel,just wondering but would not consider a &15 gallon of any fuel,do you run this fuel 100% or mix?
www.vpracingfuels.com/C5.html
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
I clicked on that link and it says don't
use on or w/catalytic converters ?? I got the Powerchip tuning done on my 01' S500 nice results I'm pretty sure I got the 93 gold package
So what about this catalytic converter issue ? And do you notice any significant difference using that product? thanks for your help Sean...
So what about this catalytic converter issue ? And do you notice any significant difference using that product? thanks for your help Sean...
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: SFV, Ca.
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
W210, W220, W163, W164, C6
Re: I clicked on that link and it says don't
Originally posted by thericker55
use on or w/catalytic converters ?? I got the Powerchip tuning done on my 01' S500 nice results I'm pretty sure I got the 93 gold package
So what about this catalytic converter issue ? And do you notice any significant difference using that product? thanks for your help Sean...
use on or w/catalytic converters ?? I got the Powerchip tuning done on my 01' S500 nice results I'm pretty sure I got the 93 gold package
So what about this catalytic converter issue ? And do you notice any significant difference using that product? thanks for your help Sean...
Trending Topics
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E55, F550, S600 Ducati 999
Before you guys run off trying different fuels remember a few important facts.
There is nothing to be gained by running higher octane fuel except a bigger fuel bill, unless you are running increased compression, boost or both.
Generally higher octane fuels are denser. When you change to a higher octane fuel, you are effectively making the mixture richer, which reduces, not increases power.
The idea of richening fuel mixtures to increase power on modern cars is a fallacy. Most WOT mixtures are overly rich for engine safety in the first place.
There is nothing to be gained by running higher octane fuel except a bigger fuel bill, unless you are running increased compression, boost or both.
Generally higher octane fuels are denser. When you change to a higher octane fuel, you are effectively making the mixture richer, which reduces, not increases power.
The idea of richening fuel mixtures to increase power on modern cars is a fallacy. Most WOT mixtures are overly rich for engine safety in the first place.
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: SFV, Ca.
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
W210, W220, W163, W164, C6
Originally posted by speedybenz
stephens,
Did PC figure out how to raise the rpm limit for Mecedes
stephens,
Did PC figure out how to raise the rpm limit for Mecedes
#12
Super Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AMG C43, 1999
The reason I ask is that Powerchip also told me they could raise the rev limit on my C43 and then they went into all the reasons why that would be bad.
But when I forced the issue Powerchip confessed that they did not know how to raise the rev limit. I felt a little cheated. What was worse was that there was no increase in power at all, based on trap speed testing and Nology PDA dyno runs.
But when I forced the issue Powerchip confessed that they did not know how to raise the rev limit. I felt a little cheated. What was worse was that there was no increase in power at all, based on trap speed testing and Nology PDA dyno runs.
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally posted by stephens
Before you guys run off trying different fuels remember a few important facts.
There is nothing to be gained by running higher octane fuel except a bigger fuel bill, unless you are running increased compression, boost or both.
Generally higher octane fuels are denser. When you change to a higher octane fuel, you are effectively making the mixture richer, which reduces, not increases power.
The idea of richening fuel mixtures to increase power on modern cars is a fallacy. Most WOT mixtures are overly rich for engine safety in the first place.
Before you guys run off trying different fuels remember a few important facts.
There is nothing to be gained by running higher octane fuel except a bigger fuel bill, unless you are running increased compression, boost or both.
Generally higher octane fuels are denser. When you change to a higher octane fuel, you are effectively making the mixture richer, which reduces, not increases power.
The idea of richening fuel mixtures to increase power on modern cars is a fallacy. Most WOT mixtures are overly rich for engine safety in the first place.
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: SFV, Ca.
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
W210, W220, W163, W164, C6
Originally posted by speedybenz
The reason I ask is that Powerchip also told me they could raise the rev limit on my C43 and then they went into all the reasons why that would be bad.
But when I forced the issue Powerchip confessed that they did not know how to raise the rev limit. I felt a little cheated. What was worse was that there was no increase in power at all, based on trap speed testing and Nology PDA dyno runs.
The reason I ask is that Powerchip also told me they could raise the rev limit on my C43 and then they went into all the reasons why that would be bad.
But when I forced the issue Powerchip confessed that they did not know how to raise the rev limit. I felt a little cheated. What was worse was that there was no increase in power at all, based on trap speed testing and Nology PDA dyno runs.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Palm Beach Gardens, Fla.
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2004 E55
![Thumbs up](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/icons/icon14.gif)
Ditto on what Zeppelin is saying about the advanced timing. He is absolutely correct. Higher octane=cooler combustion temps=more advanced timing(when programmed)=more Torq.
Hence, you absolutely need good high octane fuel!
Kens-E55
Hence, you absolutely need good high octane fuel!
Kens-E55
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E55, F550, S600 Ducati 999
Originally posted by Kens-E55
Ditto on what Zeppelin is saying about the advanced timing. He is absolutely correct. Higher octane=cooler combustion temps=more advanced timing(when programmed)=more Torq.
Hence, you absolutely need good high octane fuel!
Kens-E55
Ditto on what Zeppelin is saying about the advanced timing. He is absolutely correct. Higher octane=cooler combustion temps=more advanced timing(when programmed)=more Torq.
Hence, you absolutely need good high octane fuel!
Kens-E55
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
The guys at PC are very conservative, so if they specify 93 octane, go with 93, but also don't be surprised if you get more power on 92.
I'm not recommending to run lower octane fuel than is specified, just floating a hypothesis.