M350 to R?
Likes:
Solid build
Fair acceleration
Fair gas mileage
Dislikes:
COMAND system
Uncomfortable seats for long trips
With 2 kids, a 7 seater would be great. Found a 2012 R350 in IL, 5k miles, 54k!
Pricey for what I heard these were going for new with incentives.
Anyways, will keep my eyes open. Are the seats in the R any more comfortable than the 08 ML? Is the 3.5 V6 enough engine for these cars? Thanks!
Likes:
Solid build
Fair acceleration
Fair gas mileage
Dislikes:
COMAND system
Uncomfortable seats for long trips
With 2 kids, a 7 seater would be great. Found a 2012 R350 in IL, 5k miles, 54k!
Pricey for what I heard these were going for new with incentives.
Anyways, will keep my eyes open. Are the seats in the R any more comfortable than the 08 ML? Is the 3.5 V6 enough engine for these cars? Thanks!
As for price, I think you should be able to do much better than 54k. However, options matter, so it really depends on original MSRP. What was the MSRP?
They share essentially the same platform DNA. The same engine. And the same transmission. They even shared the same 3.90 rear axle ratio initially but Mercedes saw fit to drop the R to a taller 3.70 ratio for 2012 as they increased power from 268 to 302. So as for the question of the V6 engine being "adequate", it should feel almost identical to your M350 with a 12.5% increase in HP offset by a 5.5% increase in weight and a 5% taller axle ratio = a negligible 2% difference overall.
Where they differ slightly is drag coefficient, M350 @ 0.34 is slightly more bricklike than an R350 @ 0.31. So maybe the R is a bit more quiet at highway speeds and maybe the power feels a bit better as speeds increase.
I think where you'll really notice the difference is the size. Your M has a 114.7 inch wheelbase vs 126.6 in the R. That's a foot longer.
The track.....
Front M = 64.0 vs R = 65.5 or +1.5 in
Rear = M= 64.1 vs R = 65.3 or +1.2 in
The ride height.....
M = 8.3 vs R = 5.8 or -2.5 in
Turning circle......
M = 37.9 vs R = 40.7 or +2.8 ft
Steering gear......
M = 3.62 turns lock to lock vs R = 3.62, no difference
So, the R is longer, lower, and wider with a much bigger turning circle. You'll notice that in parking lots and parking garages. On the other hand you might notice a better, less choppy ride on the interstate with better stability and less body roll in high speed lane changes.
There's a lot more room inside for people and cargo. And the panoramic glass roof of the R dwarfs the sunroof on the M and really helps eliminate the feeling of claustrophobia for people seated in the 2nd and 3rd rows.
Styling is purely subjective and I like the interior design of the R much better than the M. But everything should feel pretty familiar there.
Rear seat access is quick and easy with the caveat that you need room to swing those giant rear doors open. You might find that an annoyance coming from an M with "normal" rear doors. I haven't found it to be a big deal though. The 2nd row in the R feels pretty much like the first row. And the 3rd row is actually livable for real world adults.
Last edited by Spud_Racer; Feb 23, 2013 at 02:59 PM.
Last edited by bumpersignal; Feb 23, 2013 at 05:38 PM.




