H&R springs SLS vs. non-SLS
07-14-2012, 04:16 PM
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
'89 560SEC, '02 E320
H&R springs SLS vs. non-SLS
H&R springs SLS vs. non-SLS
So I'm going to invest in some H&R springs springs but don't know what I should do regarding the SLS. I know I can just delete the system and go with some Bilstein HD's, but why should I? Is it that much of an increase in performance if I remove the SLS? Has anyone compared the springs with and without the SLS? Is the vehicle's stance different between the two? I can imagine those who had the SLS prior to installing the springs, deleted the system, installed Bilsteins and felt the difference. But what do those who have the lowering springs WITH the SLS system have to say about it? I'm just saying, it'll save me some $ to keep the SLS if the difference is minimal.
I have found many pics of SEC's with the springs in, SLS deleted. Does anyone have pics with the springs in and SLS?
So I'm going to invest in some H&R springs springs but don't know what I should do regarding the SLS. I know I can just delete the system and go with some Bilstein HD's, but why should I? Is it that much of an increase in performance if I remove the SLS? Has anyone compared the springs with and without the SLS? Is the vehicle's stance different between the two? I can imagine those who had the SLS prior to installing the springs, deleted the system, installed Bilsteins and felt the difference. But what do those who have the lowering springs WITH the SLS system have to say about it? I'm just saying, it'll save me some $ to keep the SLS if the difference is minimal.
I have found many pics of SEC's with the springs in, SLS deleted. Does anyone have pics with the springs in and SLS?
