Tire Size
#6
Is there a reason that you can't do 265/40 in the rear?
The overall rolling diameter is determined by the thickness of the sidewall. The thickness of the sidewall is determined by the aspect ratio compared to the width of the tire.
The first number is the width in milimeters of the tire. The second number is the percentage of that number that becomes the sidewall. The third number is the diameter of the wheel.
Seeing how you are running 18" wheels in both situations, we can take that constant out of the equation.
We only end up with two things then, the sidewall height of OEM spec, and sidewall height of your spec.
OEM height = 265*.40 = 106
Your height = 255*.35 = 89.25
So you're off about about 2 centimeters and IMO that's a pretty significant difference. I suck at percentages, so I'll do it both ways.
17 / 89 = 20%
17 / 109 = 15%
Average those two, and we get a 17% error. That IMO is a significant enough difference. Now if you were doing 255/45 (for example) you might be a little better, but the point is to compensate your skinnier tires, but having a larger aspect ratio.
I'm sure I've messed up some math some where, I'm on winter break...
The overall rolling diameter is determined by the thickness of the sidewall. The thickness of the sidewall is determined by the aspect ratio compared to the width of the tire.
The first number is the width in milimeters of the tire. The second number is the percentage of that number that becomes the sidewall. The third number is the diameter of the wheel.
Seeing how you are running 18" wheels in both situations, we can take that constant out of the equation.
We only end up with two things then, the sidewall height of OEM spec, and sidewall height of your spec.
OEM height = 265*.40 = 106
Your height = 255*.35 = 89.25
So you're off about about 2 centimeters and IMO that's a pretty significant difference. I suck at percentages, so I'll do it both ways.
17 / 89 = 20%
17 / 109 = 15%
Average those two, and we get a 17% error. That IMO is a significant enough difference. Now if you were doing 255/45 (for example) you might be a little better, but the point is to compensate your skinnier tires, but having a larger aspect ratio.
I'm sure I've messed up some math some where, I'm on winter break...
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)