Car & Driver Luxury Car Comparison
#51
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Phx, AZ moving to OC, CA
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2007 S550
Good point but they should specify the time frame of the data and not let future buyers assume that the '06 S was burdened with the same problems as the earlier models. I know since I owned an '06 S 430 and the fit/finish and mechanical operation was flawless. The poor reliability rating was not based on the '06 S which when published as such is false and misleading to the ones using the data to make a major purchase.
I've found that owners of Japanese cars I know *do* have their share of problems, but they'll never admit it in a million years because they like to feel smarter than us. They deny all knowledge of ever having had any repair work on their cars.
#52
Pre 2000 I would have NEVER picked a Lexus over a Mercedes I have owned a 220, 140, 140 coupe, 210, 201, 163 AMG, 129, 124 as well as a few others. The day Mercedes builds them like they used to I will be the first to return hopefully the S550 will bring me back
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#53
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS (USA)
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
S500/W220/2000
You neglected to answer my question: "Lexus owner perhaps?"
#57
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 4,846
Received 290 Likes
on
203 Posts
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
M
#58
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 4,846
Received 290 Likes
on
203 Posts
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
Good point but they should specify the time frame of the data and not let future buyers assume that the '06 S was burdened with the same problems as the earlier models. I know since I owned an '06 S 430 and the fit/finish and mechanical operation was flawless. The poor reliability rating was not based on the '06 S which when published as such is false and misleading to the ones using the data to make a major purchase.
BTW...let's work together on putting JD Powers out of business...but then how would the public know what toaster to buy...![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
BTW...let's work together on putting JD Powers out of business...but then how would the public know what toaster to buy...
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
The survey you're talking about which measure the previous 3 years is done by JD Powers. The same type of survey from Consumer reports was released this past spring. The one they do in the fall of every year is for current models for the first 90-120 days.
M
Last edited by Germancar1; 11-29-2006 at 01:20 AM.
#59
I thought it was an answer, considering it is no longer pre 2000.
![smash](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smashfreak.gif)
#61
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 5,517
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
6 Posts
2011 E350 Cabriolet..White and Almond Mocha
Actually Jack the recent data was from 2006 owners, not previous years which is why Mercedes raised such a big stink about it. They're basically saying the same thing you're saying, that the 06 models aren't troublesome like the 2000-2002 models were according their own warrantty costs/reports. However in some of the articles I noticed that a lot of the complaints are about brake dust and other seemingly trivial things, not actual I gotta go the "workshop" problems.
The survey you're talking about which measure the previous 3 years is done by JD Powers. The same type of survey from Consumer reports was released this past spring. The one they do in the fall of every year is for current models for the first 90-120 days.
M
The survey you're talking about which measure the previous 3 years is done by JD Powers. The same type of survey from Consumer reports was released this past spring. The one they do in the fall of every year is for current models for the first 90-120 days.
M
Brakes dust and interior smell somehow does not define what buying a $100K car is all about...especially to anyone who has owned a MB with brakes that exceed most other vehicles in stopping the car!
#62
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS (USA)
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
S500/W220/2000
Well this is only partly true. Yes they have nothing good to say about MBs when it comes to reliability, but, however, when they roadtest a MB they love it. They loved the GL450, previous S430/S500, and they recently picked the SL550 over a bunch of other cars. This is why I think it is still important for MB to try and get on their recommended lists. Hell CR even likes the R-Class, but they won't recommend anything that doesn't meet their reliability standards. Just think of the sales and good press Mercedes would get if they were actually "recommended" by CR? I think the W221 S will get the nod next year, or at least I hope it does. The E should too, but the ML, R and GL can forget it. I read too many gripes about them around here so you know CR has heard the same. The new S on the other hand I don't see how it could miss, the car has been flawless to its owners so far. I mean there isn't one "problem" thread here that I've seen.
M
M
#63
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS (USA)
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
S500/W220/2000
#64
Super Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 942
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'16 528i MSport
Thanks to the original poster of this thread
I've forwarded on the info to my pops to convince him into the S550. He's tell hell-bent between the LS460L and Audi A8 4.2L...
I've forwarded on the info to my pops to convince him into the S550. He's tell hell-bent between the LS460L and Audi A8 4.2L...
#65
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Jersey/Brooklyn
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'99 C230 K
I agree with the results as well, it would be exactly how i would place them. Just saw a LS 460L on park ave and laughed, compared to the 7 series and S550 around it, it looked cheap and tiny. lol.
#66
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS (USA)
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
S500/W220/2000
#67
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Jersey/Brooklyn
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'99 C230 K
lol this is true
I always wondered why people were in such awe of them. When a company puts so many crazy and useless gadgets in a car then they have to be covering up for something. I think the japanese car makers are just appealing to Americans stupidity. I mean if a car cant DRIVE itself, then there is no need for it to park itself.
![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
I always wondered why people were in such awe of them. When a company puts so many crazy and useless gadgets in a car then they have to be covering up for something. I think the japanese car makers are just appealing to Americans stupidity. I mean if a car cant DRIVE itself, then there is no need for it to park itself.
#68
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS (USA)
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
S500/W220/2000
lol this is true
I always wondered why people were in such awe of them. When a company puts so many crazy and useless gadgets in a car then they have to be covering up for something. I think the japanese car makers are just appealing to Americans stupidity. I mean if a car cant DRIVE itself, then there is no need for it to park itself.
![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
I always wondered why people were in such awe of them. When a company puts so many crazy and useless gadgets in a car then they have to be covering up for something. I think the japanese car makers are just appealing to Americans stupidity. I mean if a car cant DRIVE itself, then there is no need for it to park itself.
#69
lol this is true
I always wondered why people were in such awe of them. When a company puts so many crazy and useless gadgets in a car then they have to be covering up for something. I think the japanese car makers are just appealing to Americans stupidity. I mean if a car cant DRIVE itself, then there is no need for it to park itself.
![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
I always wondered why people were in such awe of them. When a company puts so many crazy and useless gadgets in a car then they have to be covering up for something. I think the japanese car makers are just appealing to Americans stupidity. I mean if a car cant DRIVE itself, then there is no need for it to park itself.
#70
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: California
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ML350 '06
I'm impressed that MB got 1st place! Obviously Lexus fans won't be...let alone accepting last place.
One thing that bothers me the most is the reasoning of some people (mostly in other car forums I've read). Lexus fans crying foul b/c this particular review suggests it's all about LUXURY and then scores suggest PERFORMANCE is the key factor.
So tell me Lexus fans, when trying to argue how COMFORTABLE and LUXURIOUS the new LS-460L is...tell me how COMFORTABLE and LUXURIOUS you think it will feel being thrown clear through the darn windshield b/c your car couldn't stop in time for the accident up ahead!? Or, maybe you can simply maneuver the car around the accident, right? Nope, again, performance (or lack there of in the Lexus' case) won't allow you to avoid the accident b/c of the poor handling etc.
What good is a BIG BOAT OF A CAR that has all the amenities that Lexus fans are bragging about, if that darn thing can't stop in time to save the lives of everyone it’s carrying!? To take more than 200 feet to stop a car...it would be an OUTRAGE if this car ranked anything other than dead last! It should be disqualified from the review! This is a very serious thing here. Bringing a car to a complete stop within a safe length is VERY important to me. Yet, others however, would try to convince us that sipping champaign from the back seat that fully reclines and has a lot of buttons and gadgets, is more important than coming to a complete and SAFE stop.
Absolutely ridiculous in my opinion!
Nick
One thing that bothers me the most is the reasoning of some people (mostly in other car forums I've read). Lexus fans crying foul b/c this particular review suggests it's all about LUXURY and then scores suggest PERFORMANCE is the key factor.
So tell me Lexus fans, when trying to argue how COMFORTABLE and LUXURIOUS the new LS-460L is...tell me how COMFORTABLE and LUXURIOUS you think it will feel being thrown clear through the darn windshield b/c your car couldn't stop in time for the accident up ahead!? Or, maybe you can simply maneuver the car around the accident, right? Nope, again, performance (or lack there of in the Lexus' case) won't allow you to avoid the accident b/c of the poor handling etc.
What good is a BIG BOAT OF A CAR that has all the amenities that Lexus fans are bragging about, if that darn thing can't stop in time to save the lives of everyone it’s carrying!? To take more than 200 feet to stop a car...it would be an OUTRAGE if this car ranked anything other than dead last! It should be disqualified from the review! This is a very serious thing here. Bringing a car to a complete stop within a safe length is VERY important to me. Yet, others however, would try to convince us that sipping champaign from the back seat that fully reclines and has a lot of buttons and gadgets, is more important than coming to a complete and SAFE stop.
Absolutely ridiculous in my opinion!
Nick
#71
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: GMT -8 hours
Posts: 5,640
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
9 Posts
Mercedes-Benz
well if you look both the S550 and LS460 have longer distances than the others, they both have something in common. All season tires.
The lexus has the smallest tire width as well. Slap some wider summer (Z rated) rubber on the lexus, I am sure it will handle better and stop in the 170-180 ft range from 70 mph. You guys are forgetting that stopping distance from that speed is mainly dependent on tires and brake fade... brake fade isn't an issue on that vehicle with the massive rotor size.
I like the S550 more, but the LS460 is a very good vehicle... Outselling the S550 already, big time.
The lexus has the smallest tire width as well. Slap some wider summer (Z rated) rubber on the lexus, I am sure it will handle better and stop in the 170-180 ft range from 70 mph. You guys are forgetting that stopping distance from that speed is mainly dependent on tires and brake fade... brake fade isn't an issue on that vehicle with the massive rotor size.
I like the S550 more, but the LS460 is a very good vehicle... Outselling the S550 already, big time.
#72
Banned
Just wondering where you got that info? Not challenging you - but from my point of view - I live in NY...... and see very few LS460s... but see PLENTY of S550s. Please confirm.
#74
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: GMT -8 hours
Posts: 5,640
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
9 Posts
Mercedes-Benz
Oh of course you see more S550s, it has been on sale since January. I'll get some figures for you.
First full month of the LS460 (nov 06): 3,613
First full month of S550 (feb 06): 3,360
Oct 06 S550 sales for comparison: 2500 (approx).
#75
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South Orange County, CA
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
4 wheels
Thats great if there are more cheap people out there who cant afford a real luxury car. It just means that our S's will be more exclusive for those who know what a real automobile is.
At the end of the day the Lexus lost fair and square, and as Nickerz pointed out, it cant stop for ****, which reaffirms my test drive results.
At the end of the day the Lexus lost fair and square, and as Nickerz pointed out, it cant stop for ****, which reaffirms my test drive results.