S versus CL
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Fairhope, Alabama
2005 E55 Wagon
S versus CL
Just asking for opinions. I am torn between the sedan and the coupe
. I don't need the full back seat often and have other vehicles to accommodate passengers. I really like the thought of the diesel and MBUSA isn't likely to import the diesel CL just for me; I tend to like the looks of two doors slightly more. The two would be optioned to approximately the same price so that's not a issue. Any thoughts would be welcome.
Thanks,
Robert
. I don't need the full back seat often and have other vehicles to accommodate passengers. I really like the thought of the diesel and MBUSA isn't likely to import the diesel CL just for me; I tend to like the looks of two doors slightly more. The two would be optioned to approximately the same price so that's not a issue. Any thoughts would be welcome.Thanks,
Robert
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
2008 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
I personally like the CL coupe better, but I've heard great things about the S350 BlueTEC clean diesel engine. Might not be helping too much, but I prefer the looks of the coupe.
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 26
Likes: 2
W210
It doesn't exist in EU (Europe) either...
Or did u mean CLS?
Anyway, if u don't often require the back seats, go for the CL without hesitation!
Last edited by The Sting; Sep 26, 2011 at 05:46 AM.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Fairhope, Alabama
2005 E55 Wagon
Ah, BlueEfficiency versus BlueTEC or the like. I officially revise my statement to "Mercedes Benz isn't likely to produce a CL diesel just for me". Sorry for the misinformation. Also, G550 is being considered as an option.
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 227
Likes: 10
From: Bay Area, California
E400S4 '17
If you don't need the rear seats much then I think the CL is better for you.
I also think it gives a younger image if you care about that.
The USA S class is the long wheelbase version but I believe the CL is not, so you don't have such a long vehicle to maneuver and park. Maybe others can say if the ride is improved or the handling in tight corners.
I personally prefer the 3/4 rear view of the S over the CL, the curved rear window and rear pillars on the CL seem a bit awkward to me, especially in a light color paint. However I prefer the pillar-less side view of the CL, and even more with all the side windows down.
Of course both are fine choices!
More pictures here ...
Let us know what you choose.
I also think it gives a younger image if you care about that.
The USA S class is the long wheelbase version but I believe the CL is not, so you don't have such a long vehicle to maneuver and park. Maybe others can say if the ride is improved or the handling in tight corners.
I personally prefer the 3/4 rear view of the S over the CL, the curved rear window and rear pillars on the CL seem a bit awkward to me, especially in a light color paint. However I prefer the pillar-less side view of the CL, and even more with all the side windows down.
Of course both are fine choices!
More pictures here ...
Let us know what you choose.
Trending Topics
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 26
Likes: 2
W210
Well the car is quite hype, but it has a weird combo of C (W203 facelift)and CLK (C209 facelift) class finish, which seems quite akward for the advised M-B eye lol.
Not to mention the memory seats adjustment unit which dates from the W210 E-Class (10 years backwards...).
But I guess it goes with the "rugged" style it's meant to be for.
Never driven one so I don't know how it feels like, but I would certainly not compare it with a CL : the CL is fantastic to drive and S-Class also (not the mention the great options which you don't have in the G).
Not to mention the memory seats adjustment unit which dates from the W210 E-Class (10 years backwards...).
But I guess it goes with the "rugged" style it's meant to be for.
Never driven one so I don't know how it feels like, but I would certainly not compare it with a CL : the CL is fantastic to drive and S-Class also (not the mention the great options which you don't have in the G).
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
Super Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 972
Likes: 28
From: DFW
BMW M850i Gran Coupe
I have had both, and as similar as they are, they are also quite different. The sedan is 8" longer, a great trunk, and makes very happy rear passengers. The coupe has horrible access to the rear and once seated, room is at a premium. Once you get past the specs, it's a matter of taste. The sedan is a sedan, basically no different in looks in any configuration from $91k to $200k. The coupe on the other hand stands out like a spaceship. I got more comments on my CL63 than I received on all my other Mercedes ever owned. IMO the CL is drop dead gorgeous and great fun to drive and own - even when parked. Get the CL and enjoy yourself.
