S-Class (W221) 2007-2013: S 320 CDI, S 350, S 450, S 500, S 550, S 420 CDI, S 600

Are These Alignment Results Valid?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-20-2016, 01:47 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
jt-hifi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 21
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
2001 ML320, 2010 S550, 2012 E350, 2015 C300 (All 4Matic vehicles)
Are These Alignment Results Valid?

Hi Folks,

MB dealers refused to do alignment for my 2010 S550 4Matic as their easy clamps don't fit on my brand new Vossen staggered wheels (Front: 9x20x255 +32mm offset and Rear: 10.5x20x285 +42mm offset, deviating from my stock square 8.5x18x255 +43mm offset while keeping very close to original overall diameter dimension. New tires are all Michelin Pilot Sport 3+ tires).

Another reason for the alignment is my recent replacement of the front left tie rod (with the Lemforder one).

So, I took it to Sears today and they completed the alignment using the Hunter machine. Attached is the results. The car drives fine and the steering is pointing straight, though it slowly drifts to the left on left most lane on highway, and drifts slowly to the right on mostly middle and right lanes. I'm hoping this is normal as the wheels are tracking to the road crown. I do notice a very slight steering vibration at around 65 mph, not sure if this is due to the tires needing the precise Roadforce balancing vs the wheel alignment precision.

Notice the front left toe was adjusted from -0.07° to +0.09° as expected from my tie rod replacement. But, the front right toe was also adjusted +0.23° to +0.16°. I asked the tech why the front left and right don't have the same exact toe-in value. He explained that both need to work in unison to achieve the balance even though their tie rods are adjusted independently. The reason seems to make sense but I wanted to get the second opinion from the forum. I suppose the same reason applies to why the left and right camber and caster values are not exactly the same as well.

The specs from my STAR Diagnostics WIS for front toe is 0°14' (±0.6'). I interpret it as +0.14° within +0.08° and +0.20° range. If my interpretation is correct, the Sears adjustment is within specs with FL: +0.09° and FR: +0.16°. I'm also assuming my staggered wheels deviating from stock don't need spec compensations.

I just noticed the Turning Angle Diff. is left blank. Why is that?

I would appreciate a look see of the results and let me know what you think. This may help our fellow forum members if Sears alignment is a good alternative now that they have the Hunter machines that are compatible with MB vehicles.

Thanks,
John
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
Sears Alignment Report.pdf (2.11 MB, 148 views)

Last edited by jt-hifi; 12-20-2016 at 05:04 AM.
Old 12-20-2016, 08:10 AM
  #2  
Out Of Control!!

 
Plutoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Tampa
Posts: 14,542
Received 1,019 Likes on 947 Posts
1999 E300TD
NO---it means toe =13.4' to 14.6'
The following users liked this post:
jt-hifi (12-20-2016)
Old 12-20-2016, 09:39 AM
  #3  
alx
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
alx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,268
Received 247 Likes on 213 Posts
Originally Posted by jt-hifi
Hi Folks,

MB dealers refused to do alignment for my 2010 S550 4Matic as their easy clamps don't fit on my brand new Vossen staggered wheels (Front: 9x20x255 +32mm offset and Rear: 10.5x20x285 +42mm offset, deviating from my stock square 8.5x18x255 +43mm offset while keeping very close to original overall diameter dimension. New tires are all Michelin Pilot Sport 3+ tires).

Another reason for the alignment is my recent replacement of the front left tie rod (with the Lemforder one).

So, I took it to Sears today and they completed the alignment using the Hunter machine. Attached is the results. The car drives fine and the steering is pointing straight, though it slowly drifts to the left on left most lane on highway, and drifts slowly to the right on mostly middle and right lanes. I'm hoping this is normal as the wheels are tracking to the road crown. I do notice a very slight steering vibration at around 65 mph, not sure if this is due to the tires needing the precise Roadforce balancing vs the wheel alignment precision.

Notice the front left toe was adjusted from -0.07° to +0.09° as expected from my tie rod replacement. But, the front right toe was also adjusted +0.23° to +0.16°. I asked the tech why the front left and right don't have the same exact toe-in value. He explained that both need to work in unison to achieve the balance even though their tie rods are adjusted independently. The reason seems to make sense but I wanted to get the second opinion from the forum. I suppose the same reason applies to why the left and right camber and caster values are not exactly the same as well.

The specs from my STAR Diagnostics WIS for front toe is 0°14' (±0.6'). I interpret it as +0.14° within +0.08° and +0.20° range. If my interpretation is correct, the Sears adjustment is within specs with FL: +0.09° and FR: +0.16°. I'm also assuming my staggered wheels deviating from stock don't need spec compensations.

I just noticed the Turning Angle Diff. is left blank. Why is that?

I would appreciate a look see of the results and let me know what you think. This may help our fellow forum members if Sears alignment is a good alternative now that they have the Hunter machines that are compatible with MB vehicles.

Thanks,
John
your right front toe needs a bit of work. the rest varies from spot on to acceptable.

but since the car is good on the road (what you describe is good) i wouldnt bother. leave it as it is.

your tire vibration around 60 is a tire balance issue or you have a bent rim, or two, or three. most aftermarket large diameter rims bend very quickly and easily and they dont necessary show visually. find a place with a hunter dsp roadforce balancer and have them balance all fours. it will show if a wheel is bent too (it will show as "too much road force")

Last edited by alx; 12-20-2016 at 09:42 AM.
The following users liked this post:
jt-hifi (12-20-2016)
Old 12-20-2016, 11:16 AM
  #4  
Member
 
bmwcrocop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 134
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2007 s550
How much was the alignment?
Old 12-20-2016, 11:25 AM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
jt-hifi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 21
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
2001 ML320, 2010 S550, 2012 E350, 2015 C300 (All 4Matic vehicles)
Originally Posted by alx
your right front toe needs a bit of work. the rest varies from spot on to acceptable.

but since the car is good on the road (what you describe is good) i wouldnt bother. leave it as it is.

your tire vibration around 60 is a tire balance issue or you have a bent rim, or two, or three. most aftermarket large diameter rims bend very quickly and easily and they dont necessary show visually. find a place with a hunter dsp roadforce balancer and have them balance all fours. it will show if a wheel is bent too (it will show as "too much road force")
Thanks Alx. I get unlimited alignments with the Sears lifetime plan ($189+tax), so I don't mind getting it tweaked. What would be the spot on value for the FR toe, 0.09° to 0.12°? If I ask them to adjust to say 0.09° on the right, will the FL toe value change?

I'll find a local Roadforce provider to get the wheels checked. Bummer, those wheels were installed this past summer, we drove it probably less than a dozen times and didn't notice hitting big potholes. Hopefully, the bend is minor. Any advice on unbending those alloy wheels?

Unrelated to this thread, I have to say the Michelin PS3+ 285 tire & 10.5" wheel combo makes a big difference in handling corners and bends. I always felt the shimmy with stock Continental touring tires but the shimmy is gone now.
Old 12-20-2016, 11:31 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
jt-hifi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 21
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
2001 ML320, 2010 S550, 2012 E350, 2015 C300 (All 4Matic vehicles)
Originally Posted by bmwcrocop
How much was the alignment?
Our threads crossed, it's $189 plus tax for unlimited alignments with no mileage restriction for as long as one owns the vehicle. They also have $89 for 6-month plan, $114 for 1-year.
Old 12-22-2016, 01:27 AM
  #7  
Super Member
 
steveb9771's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 643
Received 51 Likes on 38 Posts
2007 CL550
Originally Posted by jt-hifi

The specs from my STAR Diagnostics WIS for front toe is 0°14' (±0.6'). I interpret it as +0.14° within +0.08° and +0.20° range. If my interpretation is correct, the Sears adjustment is within specs with FL: +0.09° and FR: +0.16°.
Your interpretation is incorrect. 0°14' means 0 degrees and 14 minutes which is the same as 0 degrees + 14/60 degrees or 0.233 degrees ± 0.01 degrees.

Are you sure about the tolerance of ±0.6', this is extremely tight. If this is correct you front toe is completely out of tolerance since it should be between 0.223 and 0.243 degrees.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Are These Alignment Results Valid?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:25 PM.