wheels fitment question




you get different gearing
wrong speedo reading
wrong mileage reading
incorrect trip and service info
possible traction, abs and stability control errors
the way a manufacturer does it the tyres shrink so clearance and gearing remain unaltered.... On most Merc's check the clearance of the top suspension ball joint to the tyre... there is no room - the tyre won't go round (or almost no room to change)
I went from 17" to the option Merc 18" ones, I expected no change in ride and a small improvement on steering and ultimate handling.... what a disappointment... they car is nastier to drive, in cold temps the short sidewall doesn't flex, they are louder, there is no grip and the ride is terrible, in the damp it gets no grip (running MO Dunlop's to original fitment spec). And overall ride comfort has gone awol. Its like the difference between comfort to sport +15% in comfort and unpleasant + in sport.
If I knew how it would impact the car I could have saved $1500 and had a car that looked worse but was a better car to drive.
you get different gearing
wrong speedo reading
wrong mileage reading
incorrect trip and service info
possible traction, abs and stability control errors
the way a manufacturer does it the tyres shrink so clearance and gearing remain unaltered.... On most Merc's check the clearance of the top suspension ball joint to the tyre... there is no room - the tyre won't go round (or almost no room to change)
I went from 17" to the option Merc 18" ones, I expected no change in ride and a small improvement on steering and ultimate handling.... what a disappointment... they car is nastier to drive, in cold temps the short sidewall doesn't flex, they are louder, there is no grip and the ride is terrible, in the damp it gets no grip (running MO Dunlop's to original fitment spec). And overall ride comfort has gone awol. Its like the difference between comfort to sport +15% in comfort and unpleasant + in sport.
If I knew how it would impact the car I could have saved $1500 and had a car that looked worse but was a better car to drive.
The admonition to walk a mile in someone else's shoes, means before judging someone, you must understand his experiences, challenges, thought processes, etc.
its worse on UK roads where I live, 10% worse for 20% handling gain I'd accept, 25% worse for most of the time no gain at all isn't so clever
Trending Topics




I had first the rear of the car go all the way down for spring leak then the same happened in front. No rubbing of tires to fenders in either end of the car.
And I don’t think a German car maker would make a car that would have possibility of tires rubbing the fenders if car hits the lowest point on springs. That could happen during normal drive on a bad road.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




you get different gearing
wrong speedo reading
wrong mileage reading
incorrect trip and service info
possible traction, abs and stability control errors
the way a manufacturer does it the tyres shrink so clearance and gearing remain unaltered.... On most Merc's check the clearance of the top suspension ball joint to the tyre... there is no room - the tyre won't go round (or almost no room to change)
I went from 17" to the option Merc 18" ones, I expected no change in ride and a small improvement on steering and ultimate handling.... what a disappointment... they car is nastier to drive, in cold temps the short sidewall doesn't flex, they are louder, there is no grip and the ride is terrible, in the damp it gets no grip (running MO Dunlop's to original fitment spec). And overall ride comfort has gone awol. Its like the difference between comfort to sport +15% in comfort and unpleasant + in sport.
If I knew how it would impact the car I could have saved $1500 and had a car that looked worse but was a better car to drive.
It may have saved me from a tire damage when I hit a steel bar on road at highway speed though. Other than that, nothing.
And I had the exact same tire type from the same manufacturer on both rims so it should not be about the possible tire difference either.
Last edited by Arrie; Mar 14, 2021 at 09:12 AM.
It may have saved me from a tire damage when I hit a steel bar on road at highway speed though. Other than that, nothing.
And I had the exact same tire type from the same manufacturer on both rims so it should not be about the possible tire difference either.




If you want smoothness you can get softer ride with some cheap tires with flimsy side walls on 20” rims than good quality tires give on 17”.
I believe 18” was selected for looks with biggest they felt is ok for tire/rim safety when hitting obstacles on roads.
If you want smoothness you can get softer ride with some cheap tires with flimsy side walls on 20” rims than good quality tires give on 17”.
I believe 18” was selected for looks with biggest they felt is ok for tire/rim safety when hitting obstacles on roads.
But yes, I would def agree that there’s many reasons they developed the car with an 18” rim in mind as the base.....looks included. If Mercedes felt there would have been much to be gained in terms of comfort by offering a 17” rim with the design of this chassis, I assume the engineers would have looked into it while developing the 221.





