S-Class (W222) 2014-2020

3D Surround compared to SL B&O with front bass?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-22-2013, 12:05 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
pmrogers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2013 SL65 45th Anniversary Edition, 2014 Range Rover Sport Autobiography
3D Surround compared to SL B&O with front bass?

One of my favorite features on our '13 SL is the B&O system with front bass. I'm considering swapping the SL for a W221 S63 with the 3D Surround system, but would be sorely disappointed if the audio system is not as good.

Has anyone here heard both systems?

Thanks in advance for any input.

-Paul
Old 12-22-2013, 03:37 PM
  #2  
Super Moderator

 
Wolfman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 10,078
Received 3,267 Likes on 2,032 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
Originally Posted by pmrogers
One of my favorite features on our '13 SL is the B&O system with front bass. I'm considering swapping the SL for a W221 S63 with the 3D Surround system, but would be sorely disappointed if the audio system is not as good. Has anyone here heard both systems? Thanks in advance for any input. -Paul
W221? If you mean W222, the base Burmester already beats the B&O. As stated in other posts, the 3D system blows the base Burmester out of the water. FWIW, I listened to the B&O in the SL before deciding not to get it as I felt that while the difference was great sitting in a standing car with the top up, it was minimal at best driving with the top down.
Old 12-23-2013, 04:51 PM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
pmrogers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2013 SL65 45th Anniversary Edition, 2014 Range Rover Sport Autobiography
Originally Posted by Wolfman
W221? If you mean W222, the base Burmester already beats the B&O. As stated in other posts, the 3D system blows the base Burmester out of the water. FWIW, I listened to the B&O in the SL before deciding not to get it as I felt that while the difference was great sitting in a standing car with the top up, it was minimal at best driving with the top down.
Thanks for the response, Wolfman. Sorry for the typo, I did mean the W222 of course. Just to double check my understanding, you are saying the base Burmester beats the SL B&O with front bass in your experience? Or are you talking about the S class B&O system? I was also not impressed with the B&O in the S class; the '13 SL B&O implementation is head and shoulders above the one in the previous S class to my ears, and it is that standard that I don't want to step down from.
Old 12-25-2013, 03:57 AM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
investorsc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Western PA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2010 GL550, 2009 SL600 RENNTECH, 2014 S63
The Burmester 3D bass will blow you away- I HAVE heard the SL with B&O- Nice system, but not even close!
Old 12-25-2013, 07:59 AM
  #5  
Member
Thread Starter
 
pmrogers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2013 SL65 45th Anniversary Edition, 2014 Range Rover Sport Autobiography
Thanks so much, investorsc, great to hear.

Paul
Old 12-26-2013, 10:02 AM
  #6  
Member
 
russjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
sls, e63
had B&O in 2013 SL and top burmeister in new S and their is no comparison: burmeister better bass control, pristine clarity, better separation, etc..

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 3D Surround compared to SL B&O with front bass?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 PM.