3D Surround compared to SL B&O with front bass?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2013 SL65 45th Anniversary Edition, 2014 Range Rover Sport Autobiography
3D Surround compared to SL B&O with front bass?
One of my favorite features on our '13 SL is the B&O system with front bass. I'm considering swapping the SL for a W221 S63 with the 3D Surround system, but would be sorely disappointed if the audio system is not as good.
Has anyone here heard both systems?
Thanks in advance for any input.
-Paul
Has anyone here heard both systems?
Thanks in advance for any input.
-Paul
#2
Super Moderator
![](https://staticssl.ibsrv.net/autocomm/Content/MB/mbwambassador2.gif)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 10,078
Received 3,267 Likes
on
2,032 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
One of my favorite features on our '13 SL is the B&O system with front bass. I'm considering swapping the SL for a W221 S63 with the 3D Surround system, but would be sorely disappointed if the audio system is not as good. Has anyone here heard both systems? Thanks in advance for any input. -Paul
#3
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2013 SL65 45th Anniversary Edition, 2014 Range Rover Sport Autobiography
W221? If you mean W222, the base Burmester already beats the B&O. As stated in other posts, the 3D system blows the base Burmester out of the water. FWIW, I listened to the B&O in the SL before deciding not to get it as I felt that while the difference was great sitting in a standing car with the top up, it was minimal at best driving with the top down.