will the 2015 S550 4Matic sedan have a 9-speed or 7-speed tranny?
#1
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,755
Likes: 796
From: FL & CT
2015 S550 Palladium/Deep Sea Blue, 2016 Tesla Model S 70D, 2015 Volvo XC70
will the 2015 S550 4Matic sedan have a 9-speed or 7-speed tranny?
I had read 9-speed awhile ago, but noticed that recent articles about the 2015 S-class coupe mention the old 7-speed. So, does anyone know which tranny the 2015 sedan will have?
#4
The document my dealer had in regards to the new 2015 indicates that it would have the old 7-speed. The touch pad is standard in Canada however unlike the US, the Air Balance Package is still an option in Canada.
#5
DTB - Launch Support for Automatic Transmission (9G-TRONIC): “The automatic transmission (9G-TRONIC) with code 421 (9-speed automatic transmission) will be used for the first time as of Fall 2014.” https://mbworld.org/forums/5870705-post4.html
#6
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,755
Likes: 796
From: FL & CT
2015 S550 Palladium/Deep Sea Blue, 2016 Tesla Model S 70D, 2015 Volvo XC70
Thanks for the replies, everyone.
It isn't clear to me that this particular quote refers to the W222.
DTB - Launch Support for Automatic Transmission (9G-TRONIC): “The automatic transmission (9G-TRONIC) with code 421 (9-speed automatic transmission) will be used for the first time as of Fall 2014.” https://mbworld.org/forums/5870705-post4.html
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 7
From: Toronto
2005 ML350, 2008 GL320, 2013 Gl350
There will be no 9 speed in any MB in the North American market until 2016 model year. I have done endless research into this. In Germany the 2014 E350 with RWD does come with the 9 speed but its very hush hush, no big news story about it.
Last edited by cookstar; 02-16-2014 at 09:55 AM.
Trending Topics
#9
The 7 speed transmission in my 221 is very smooth and apparently has been around a long time. I guess a 9 speed would be better but I'm not sure if it will make a significant difference.
#12
#13
#14
Agree for 100%
7G-Tronic should be replaced asap as it is no longer up-to-date compared to any peers which typically use the ZF transmission.
#15
I agree too. With the amount of low end torque we have in the S550 I don't see the purpose in a 9 speed. I can only see the 9 speed being a measurable improvement for an engine with a narrow torque curve, so this might be a good pairing with a diesel engine.
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 290
From: Dallas TX
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
The 9G is needed for a number of reasons. Faster shifting, smoother shifting and for better fuel economy just to name the biggest reasons. Mercedes' transmissions just don't downshift fast enough. I don't think they want them too because surely they could make them react faster. The 9G should take care of all these.
M
M
#17
The 9G is needed for a number of reasons. Faster shifting, smoother shifting and for better fuel economy just to name the biggest reasons. Mercedes' transmissions just don't downshift fast enough. I don't think they want them too because surely they could make them react faster. The 9G should take care of all these.
M
M
With the torque curve that the S550 has and the low RPMs while cruising I don't see how having more gears will increase fuel economy. Under normal acceleration I rarely go over 2400 RPM.
I assume, that like you said, MB could make the existing transmission shift faster or smoother if they wanted, trying to understand how more gears will help that. Until they make faster gear changes the only thing that I see happening with more gears is spending less time applying torque and more time sliding from one gear to another.
If we really want a smooth acceleration with no time spent shifting than we should be asking for the next generation CVT, but I understand there are challenges with high torque applications and also a perception in the market that they are inferior and people like to feel shifts so the current CVTs are programmed to purposely have "rough" spots to simulate shifting.
I am just concerned that the number of gears at this point is becoming a meaningless marketing item - "if having gears is good, than having more is always better" I don't think is a correct assumption.
#18
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 290
From: Dallas TX
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
Curious, how will having more gears make shifts any faster? Or how will having more gears make the shifts smoother? Or how will having more gears increase fuel economy? No disrespect intended, and intention to inflame, am genuinely curious.
With the torque curve that the S550 has and the low RPMs while cruising I don't see how having more gears will increase fuel economy. Under normal acceleration I rarely go over 2400 RPM.
I assume, that like you said, MB could make the existing transmission shift faster or smoother if they wanted, trying to understand how more gears will help that. Until they make faster gear changes the only thing that I see happening with more gears is spending less time applying torque and more time sliding from one gear to another.
If we really want a smooth acceleration with no time spent shifting than we should be asking for the next generation CVT, but I understand there are challenges with high torque applications and also a perception in the market that they are inferior and people like to feel shifts so the current CVTs are programmed to purposely have "rough" spots to simulate shifting.
I am just concerned that the number of gears at this point is becoming a meaningless marketing item - "if having gears is good, than having more is always better" I don't think is a correct assumption.
With the torque curve that the S550 has and the low RPMs while cruising I don't see how having more gears will increase fuel economy. Under normal acceleration I rarely go over 2400 RPM.
I assume, that like you said, MB could make the existing transmission shift faster or smoother if they wanted, trying to understand how more gears will help that. Until they make faster gear changes the only thing that I see happening with more gears is spending less time applying torque and more time sliding from one gear to another.
If we really want a smooth acceleration with no time spent shifting than we should be asking for the next generation CVT, but I understand there are challenges with high torque applications and also a perception in the market that they are inferior and people like to feel shifts so the current CVTs are programmed to purposely have "rough" spots to simulate shifting.
I am just concerned that the number of gears at this point is becoming a meaningless marketing item - "if having gears is good, than having more is always better" I don't think is a correct assumption.
Not more gears, but a new transmission, new hardware, new software. More gears will give you better fuel economy especially on the highway. CVTs don't belong in luxury cars. I'm sure Mercedes could make the 7G shift as smoothly and quickly as the ZF 8HP, but they haven't. Yeah 9 years is a getting into a marketing driven thing, but they said the same thing about 6 speeds back in 2002 and then 7 back in 2004.
M
#20
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 318
Likes: 12
2014 S550, 2011 E350 Cabriolet, Asgard Mothership
There seems to be an assumption that because the 7G came out several years ago, it is not improved at all. It doesn't seem valid that a manufacturer would not constantly improve its manufacturing and design to evolve with the times. I agree that the 9G will have two more gears, but can we really say it is a 10 year old design? I'm just curious.
#21
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,755
Likes: 796
From: FL & CT
2015 S550 Palladium/Deep Sea Blue, 2016 Tesla Model S 70D, 2015 Volvo XC70
For any given condition there is going to be an optimal gear ratio. With 9 to choose from rather than 7, there is a greater probability the car will end up closer to the optimal ratio (assuming the hardware and software are up to the task).
Last edited by syswei; 02-18-2014 at 07:20 AM.
#22
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,394
Likes: 300
From: Europe
223.168 & 213.012 & 906.633 & 214.005
If the 9G-Tronic will have similar initial issues as the 5-speed and the 7-speed transmission had (I don't know how well the 4-speed did initially), I'd rather take the marginal loss from 7 gears.
Resale value could be significant, depends on how reliable and smooth the 9-speed tranny turns out to be.
#23
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 7
From: Toronto
2005 ML350, 2008 GL320, 2013 Gl350
Hyundai is developing an in house 10 speed, I dont personally see a point to a 10 speed unless you are driving at very high rates of speed for a long period of time, I.E autobahn at 140 mph for an hour. An 8 or 9 speed is perfect as you could be doing regular or even 100 mph highway speeds at 1300-1500 rpm
#24
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 170
From: USA
W140 Mercedes S350, W221 S550 sport
http://m.green.autoblog.com/2013/03/...-for-cherokee/
Interesting read. The jeep went from 19 mpg to 31 mpg with the 9 speed it just got.
I also read that the new S with 9 speed will do 75 mph at 1,350 rpm. That is low!
Interesting read. The jeep went from 19 mpg to 31 mpg with the 9 speed it just got.
I also read that the new S with 9 speed will do 75 mph at 1,350 rpm. That is low!
#25
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 7
From: Toronto
2005 ML350, 2008 GL320, 2013 Gl350
everyone thinks the MB 7G Tronic+ is a great transmission UNTIL they actually drive a vehicle with the ZF 8 speed, I was one of those MB fanboys and still am lol but its very clunky compared to the ZF, gear changes are like a scalding knife going through soft butter, so much smoother than the MB