why is the 4matic sedan rated for better MPG than the coupe?
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,755
Likes: 797
From: FL & CT
2015 S550 Palladium/Deep Sea Blue, 2016 Tesla Model S 70D, 2015 Volvo XC70
why is the 4matic sedan rated for better MPG than the coupe?
On fueleconomy.gov, the S550 4matic coupe is listed as 16 city / 24 highway, the 4matic sedan 16/26. The S550 4matic sedan appears to have the same engine (someone correct me if I'm wrong), same 7G tranny (in the U.S.), is slightly heavier, and is taller. I don't know the drag coefficients, but to my eye the sedan looks less aerodynamic. So why would it get better highway mpg?
Could MB be fibbing?
Could MB be fibbing?
Last edited by syswei; Dec 8, 2014 at 10:19 PM.
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 19
Likes: 1
S550
I dont know the answer to your question. However my S550 sedan wouldn't get 26mpg unless I threw it off a cliff. The absolute best I ever saw was 24.5 and that was for a very short drive being extra conservative. General the average on highway is 21 to 23 at the very top. It's a pig.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 394
'25 S63 AMG E Performance, '26 CLE 53 AMG
I dont know the answer to your question. However my S550 sedan wouldn't get 26mpg unless I threw it off a cliff. The absolute best I ever saw was 24.5 and that was for a very short drive being extra conservative. General the average on highway is 21 to 23 at the very top. It's a pig.
Attached Please find my best MPG on a recent long 2000 mile trip. Normally mixed highway/city my mileage does not touch my reported 25.2 mpg. With that said, the picture is the best MPG I have been able to pull off on my '14 S550 4matic.
Member
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Port St. Lucie Florida
2009 SL600, 2015 Lexus RX450h, 2014 S550
I dont know the answer to your question. However my S550 sedan wouldn't get 26mpg unless I threw it off a cliff. The absolute best I ever saw was 24.5 and that was for a very short drive being extra conservative. General the average on highway is 21 to 23 at the very top. It's a pig.
I usually average 25.5 mpg to 26.5 mpg @ 70 mph on the same road for the same distance here in South FL with 20" run flats.
Now for my secret: when using premium 93 octane fuel I only get 23-24 mpg under the same above conditions with my 2014 S550.
Experimenting with regular 87 octane fuel I get the better fuel economy.
This is why: the higher the octane the less BTUs in a gallon of gas.
If more octane is added to the volume of gas, some gas needs to be reduced to make room for the octane additive. Octane does nothing for fuel economy.
Octane is what keeps our engine from detonation or pinging. Since I haven't experienced any pinging or detonation and don't drag race my S550 for competition, I haven't found any loss of power or performance to date.
I started with premium like most of us do. Then mixing premium with mid grade, then just mid grade, then premium with regular, then just regular. My fuel economy continued to improve with no ill effect.
Experiment at your own risk. I'd start with a near empty tank, fill half with regular fuel and drive. If you have a hint of pinging then fill the remaining volume with premium fuel. If you have no I'll effect continue to use regular but monitor what you hear & feel. Start first with a baseline what premium gets you for fuel economy. Then see if there's improvment using the less expensive fuel.
With fuel prices dropping I've noticed premium prices falling slower than regular gas. It use to be a 20¢ to 30¢ price difference between regular gas & premium gas. I've seen locally as much as 80¢ a gallon difference between regular gas & premium gas.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,755
Likes: 797
From: FL & CT
2015 S550 Palladium/Deep Sea Blue, 2016 Tesla Model S 70D, 2015 Volvo XC70
Oink oink, I've seen 28 mpg @ 70 mph for about 30 miles on a 170 mi trip.
I usually average 25.5 mpg to 26.5 mpg @ 70 mph on the same road for the same distance here in South FL with 20" run flats.
Now for my secret: when using premium 93 octane fuel I only get 23-24 mpg under the same above conditions with my 2014 S550.
Experimenting with regular 87 octane fuel I get the better fuel economy.
This is why: the higher the octane the less BTUs in a gallon of gas.
If more octane is added to the volume of gas, some gas needs to be reduced to make room for the octane additive. Octane does nothing for fuel economy.
Octane is what keeps our engine from detonation or pinging. Since I haven't experienced any pinging or detonation and don't drag race my S550 for competition, I haven't found any loss of power or performance to date.
I started with premium like most of us do. Then mixing premium with mid grade, then just mid grade, then premium with regular, then just regular. My fuel economy continued to improve with no ill effect.
Experiment at your own risk. I'd start with a near empty tank, fill half with regular fuel and drive. If you have a hint of pinging then fill the remaining volume with premium fuel. If you have no I'll effect continue to use regular but monitor what you hear & feel. Start first with a baseline what premium gets you for fuel economy. Then see if there's improvment using the less expensive fuel.
With fuel prices dropping I've noticed premium prices falling slower than regular gas. It use to be a 20¢ to 30¢ price difference between regular gas & premium gas. I've seen locally as much as 80¢ a gallon difference between regular gas & premium gas.
I usually average 25.5 mpg to 26.5 mpg @ 70 mph on the same road for the same distance here in South FL with 20" run flats.
Now for my secret: when using premium 93 octane fuel I only get 23-24 mpg under the same above conditions with my 2014 S550.
Experimenting with regular 87 octane fuel I get the better fuel economy.
This is why: the higher the octane the less BTUs in a gallon of gas.
If more octane is added to the volume of gas, some gas needs to be reduced to make room for the octane additive. Octane does nothing for fuel economy.
Octane is what keeps our engine from detonation or pinging. Since I haven't experienced any pinging or detonation and don't drag race my S550 for competition, I haven't found any loss of power or performance to date.
I started with premium like most of us do. Then mixing premium with mid grade, then just mid grade, then premium with regular, then just regular. My fuel economy continued to improve with no ill effect.
Experiment at your own risk. I'd start with a near empty tank, fill half with regular fuel and drive. If you have a hint of pinging then fill the remaining volume with premium fuel. If you have no I'll effect continue to use regular but monitor what you hear & feel. Start first with a baseline what premium gets you for fuel economy. Then see if there's improvment using the less expensive fuel.
With fuel prices dropping I've noticed premium prices falling slower than regular gas. It use to be a 20¢ to 30¢ price difference between regular gas & premium gas. I've seen locally as much as 80¢ a gallon difference between regular gas & premium gas.
EDIT: ...on my 2008.
Last edited by syswei; Dec 9, 2014 at 02:24 PM.
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 19
Likes: 1
S550
I have had naturally aspirated engines before that stated they required premium and I used regular without any issues. However in my S550 I have been using premium (91 is best we can get here in CA) since new. I am worried that with the turbos it might have a problem or blow something up under boost pressure.
Any thoughts on this? I know in the Ford Ecoboost engines which are also twin turbo you can use regular with some "loss of performance" but the power difference can never actually be felt driving one. So I wonder if that is the same in the MB or if we would risk some failure under boost by using 87 octane.
Any comments on this?
Any thoughts on this? I know in the Ford Ecoboost engines which are also twin turbo you can use regular with some "loss of performance" but the power difference can never actually be felt driving one. So I wonder if that is the same in the MB or if we would risk some failure under boost by using 87 octane.
Any comments on this?
Super Moderator
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,556
Likes: 3,680
From: Land of 10,000 lakes
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
I have had naturally aspirated engines before that stated they required premium and I used regular without any issues. However in my S550 I have been using premium (91 is best we can get here in CA) since new. I am worried that with the turbos it might have a problem or blow something up under boost pressure.
Any thoughts on this? I know in the Ford Ecoboost engines which are also twin turbo you can use regular with some "loss of performance" but the power difference can never actually be felt driving one. So I wonder if that is the same in the MB or if we would risk some failure under boost by using 87 octane.
Any comments on this?
Any thoughts on this? I know in the Ford Ecoboost engines which are also twin turbo you can use regular with some "loss of performance" but the power difference can never actually be felt driving one. So I wonder if that is the same in the MB or if we would risk some failure under boost by using 87 octane.
Any comments on this?
That said, these engines are designed to handle various grades of fuel around the world as many countries aren't as strict in controlling the fuel grades on pumps.
US fuel is not that great either with the ethanol supplement that varies by state.
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Port St. Lucie Florida
2009 SL600, 2015 Lexus RX450h, 2014 S550
I have had naturally aspirated engines before that stated they required premium and I used regular without any issues. However in my S550 I have been using premium (91 is best we can get here in CA) since new. I am worried that with the turbos it might have a problem or blow something up under boost pressure.
Any thoughts on this? I know in the Ford Ecoboost engines which are also twin turbo you can use regular with some "loss of performance" but the power difference can never actually be felt driving one. So I wonder if that is the same in the MB or if we would risk some failure under boost by using 87 octane.
Any comments on this?
Any thoughts on this? I know in the Ford Ecoboost engines which are also twin turbo you can use regular with some "loss of performance" but the power difference can never actually be felt driving one. So I wonder if that is the same in the MB or if we would risk some failure under boost by using 87 octane.
Any comments on this?
http://www.edmunds.com/fuel-economy/...g-premium.html
I noticed that our cars "require" premium fuel so I'm taking a risk running on regular fuel. I may have to rethink my choice of fuels even though my fuel economy will drop using premium fuel. Oh well at least I know in a pinch the S550 will run on regular.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)
Verdad Gallardo
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
Member
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Port St. Lucie Florida
2009 SL600, 2015 Lexus RX450h, 2014 S550
Here's a question.
Since difference in regular fuel prices to premium fuel locally can be 80¢ a gallon, would adding octane booster to a regular gas fill up make better money sense?
Since difference in regular fuel prices to premium fuel locally can be 80¢ a gallon, would adding octane booster to a regular gas fill up make better money sense?
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 431
S600
I dont know the answer to your question. However my S550 sedan wouldn't get 26mpg unless I threw it off a cliff. The absolute best I ever saw was 24.5 and that was for a very short drive being extra conservative. General the average on highway is 21 to 23 at the very top. It's a pig.
It must be the way you drive.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 431
S600
Lower octane will create greater pressure in the cylinders. As long as this greater pressure occurs after TDC the engine makes more power.
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 19
Likes: 1
S550
