I need to soften this thing up...
you compute the rolling diameter by:: rd = wd + (www*sh*2)/25.4
www*sh is the height of the sidewall
www*sh*2 is the added rolling diameter
/25.4 converts millimeters to inches.
Also note: the width of the tire on the road = www/25.4
And the wheel width should be ~= www/25.4 - 0.5-to-1.0
So.....you have the wrong size
you can look in your user manual it has alternates.
the gas filler lid lists sizes also
or. Sites like tire rack give tire circumference
It is common knowledge in all of the most recent reviews that the S class's ride is no longer king. The RFTs don't help things, but if after switching to regular tires that you feel the ride is still too harsh, switch to the A8 or the Bentley Bentaga...
This is one of MANY reviews that speak to the ride of the S class being inferior to its rivals these days. T=9:31.
Last edited by superangrypenguin; Aug 3, 2019 at 12:30 AM.
https://www.tirerack.com/tires/TireS...SortCode=60000
Last edited by Psylon; Mar 10, 2020 at 01:43 PM. Reason: add`l info
The Best of Mercedes & AMG








I just switched to the Bridgestone Quiettrack on the S550 and I am absolutely blown away.
The difference between the two cars now is dramatic. The W222 S550 with Quietracks is the smoothest AND most quiet ride I have ever experienced in any car i have owned - which includes four S-Classes
it is a given that the S63 would have a "sportier" suspension, but the harshness extends beyond the suspension.
It is just not acceptable that the W222 engineering and project budget would result in NO spare, 50 miles of flat protection and a lifetime of harsh rides.
The stubborn side of "the best or nothing"
I just switched to the Bridgestone Quiettrack on the S550 and I am absolutely blown away.
The difference between the two cars now is dramatic. The W222 S550 with Quietracks is the smoothest AND most quiet ride I have ever experienced in any car i have owned - which includes four S-Classes
it is a given that the S63 would have a "sportier" suspension, but the harshness extends beyond the suspension.
It is just not acceptable that the W222 engineering and project budget would result in NO spare, 50 miles of flat protection and a lifetime of harsh rides.
The stubborn side of "the best or nothing"




I just switched to the Bridgestone Quiettrack on the S550 and I am absolutely blown away.
The difference between the two cars now is dramatic. The W222 S550 with Quietracks is the smoothest AND most quiet ride I have ever experienced in any car i have owned - which includes four S-Classes
it is a given that the S63 would have a "sportier" suspension, but the harshness extends beyond the suspension.
It is just not acceptable that the W222 engineering and project budget would result in NO spare, 50 miles of flat protection and a lifetime of harsh rides.
The stubborn side of "the best or nothing"




It is smoother now than with the RFT
Maybe by 2019 they have it right - but it is a tough engineering feat to get the suspension tuned to assist with the lack of tire sidewall absorption over larger "bumps".as is standard on premium luxury tires.. of course if it were easy, the forums world wide would not have the complaints because MB would have had it right day one... but its a toughie...
In addition to that noted above - a smooth ride is definitely relative....the amount of complaints from lifelong (me - 27years) owners like myself in the forums at least indicates that there are many that do care and expect a top tier luxury automobile to have a ride quality that is also top tier.
for at least some of us, we demand a "better" ride than the RFT provides in our respective model year and options...for others the ride may be great as is, and that is fine ...MB certainly likes to hear that...
This is why the Endurance race cars use large wheels--they don't use them because they are faster, or have a better ride, they use them because the brakes last longer and stop better.
NOT when doing the 1-2-3-4-5 stops from moderately high speeds (<90 MPH).
Wheels larger than (about) 18" have LESS traction than larger wheels, less traction for acceleration, deceleration, and cornering.
The rotating mass is larger, leading to longer acceleration and deceleration intervals.
To me those large wheels and thin tires speaks Gheto not Go Get 'Em.


Wheels larger than (about) 18" have LESS traction than larger wheels, less traction for acceleration, deceleration, and cornering.
The rotating mass is larger, leading to longer acceleration and deceleration intervals.
To me those large wheels and thin tires speaks Gheto not Go Get 'Em.
This is why the Endurance race cars use large wheels--they don't use them because they are faster, or have a better ride, they use them because the brakes last longer and stop better.
NOT when doing the 1-2-3-4-5 stops from moderately high speeds (<90 MPH).
Wheels larger than (about) 18" have LESS traction than larger wheels, less traction for acceleration, deceleration, and cornering.
The rotating mass is larger, leading to longer acceleration and deceleration intervals.
To me those large wheels and thin tires speaks Gheto not Go Get 'Em.
It seems that the biggest stink to the 19 & 20" wheel options is that they come standard with run-flats and no spare option. I don't care for the RFT's either and will be swapping them out for standard rubber when these are worn out.
It seems that the biggest stink to the 19 & 20" wheel options is that they come standard with run-flats and no spare option. I don't care for the RFT's either and will be swapping them out for standard rubber when these are worn out.




Another baseless opinion. The 20" wheels offered as an option on these cars look soooo much better than any of the 18 or 19" options. And it is factually incorrect that the 20's have longer or worse stopping than 19 or 20's. The 20's have the same rolling diameter as the base 18's.
Useless conjecture. The S isn't a track car. The 20" wheels are visually more appealing to most people with a discernable eye for style.
Uneducated? That's funny!! Perhaps you should take a look in the mirror when you say that. Have you even seen the 20's in person that MB offers as an option? They are staggered and quite a bit wider in the back than the stock 18's. They hook wayy better than the higher profile narrow 18's and the lower profile tires handle significantly better in the twisties. The only advantage to the taller profile 18's are the rolley-polley softer ride (if that's what you like) and they are less apt to bending when hitting potholes. I think you're confusing the 20's with 22 or 24" ghetto wheels running rubber-band tires....which these certainly are not.
It seems that the biggest stink to the 19 & 20" wheel options is that they come standard with run-flats and no spare option. I don't care for the RFT's either and will be swapping them out for standard rubber when these are worn out.









