Auto pilot steering wheel weights


For pre-facelift, these weights will provide (static) weight and that's not how the W222 pre/facelift steering wheel logic work. pre-facelift has torque sensing and is based on tracking micro-torque changes. If the torque doesn't change frequently enough, like a knee touching the wheel, or human hand touching it which won't be static all the time, then the car will send a signal to touch the wheel or move it slightly again. IF the weights are too heavy and wiggly enough, perhaps the car chassis movement on rough roads may help sometimes to trigger that torque change, but it's still not going to work all the time on smoother roads.
For the facelift, the steering wheel has capacitive sensing embedded under the leather of the steering wheel. Just like your smartphone screen, it detects the electrical conductivity of your skin. Weights will NOT work because of the lack of electrical conductivity like our skin. Weights will not work regardless unless u move them left to right, which is useless then.
I placed the weight on the wheel in the 5 o'clock position. Steering assist ON, lane keep assist ON, histrionic ON. And I was able to go several miles without touching the steering wheel at all. The weight does indeed fool the car to think you are holding the wheel. Its definitely not capacitive touch steering wheel.
My observations;
1 the car corrected itself more than usual on curves. Probably because it thinks your steering it wrong from the weight pulling it.
2 on straight sections it's normal.
3 it works better at slower speeds. I felt 65-67mph was the sweet spot.
4 the car was able to handle sharp curves with no trouble. Road markings were in good shape.
5 my car is the refresh model. 2020 S560 4matic.
This weight is a game changer! Keep in mind you should always pay attention to the road and the car at all times.
Last edited by Z06Life; Jan 21, 2026 at 12:51 PM.


I placed the weight on the wheel in the 5 o'clock position. Steering assist ON, lane keep assist ON, histrionic ON. And I was able to go several miles without touching the steering wheel at all. The weight does indeed fool the car to think you are holding the wheel. Its definitely not capacitive touch steering wheel.
My observations;
1 the car corrected itself more than usual on curves. Probably because it thinks your steering it wrong from the weight pulling it.
2 on straight sections it's normal.
3 it works better at slower speeds. I felt 65-67mph was the sweet spot.
This weight is a game changer! Keep in mind you should always pay attention to the road and the car at all times.
Which weight did you get? eBay?




Last edited by superswiss; Jan 21, 2026 at 12:51 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




I placed the weight on the wheel in the 5 o'clock position. Steering assist ON, lane keep assist ON, histrionic ON. And I was able to go several miles without touching the steering wheel at all. The weight does indeed fool the car to think you are holding the wheel. Its definitely not capacitive touch steering wheel.
My observations;
1 the car corrected itself more than usual on curves. Probably because it thinks your steering it wrong from the weight pulling it.
2 on straight sections it's normal.
3 it works better at slower speeds. I felt 65-67mph was the sweet spot.
4 the car was able to handle sharp curves with no trouble. Road markings were in good shape.
5 my car is the refresh model. 2020 S560 4matic.
This weight is a game changer! Keep in mind you should always pay attention to the road and the car at all times.

The earlier models operate differently due to only having 1 camera as opposed to the multiple cameras on the later models.





The earlier models operate differently due to only having 1 camera as opposed to the multiple cameras on the later models.
Also, ALKA actually uses both the inner front and rear brakes to pull the car back into its lane. I'm not entirely sure why MB chose this brute force method, other than it's pretty effective at getting the driver's attention, especially if they are fading off into the land of dreams. But, Active Steering Assist keeps the car center by turning the front wheels, and not via individual braking torque on the rear wheels.
BTW, there's also a difference between Lane Keep Assist and Active Lane Keep Assist. The former is standard, whereas the latter is part of the Driver Assistance package. The basic LKA only vibrates the steering wheel if you drift outside of your lane, whereas Active Lane Keep Assist as said applies the inner brakes to pull you back. Same actually goes for Blind Spot Assist and Active Blind Spot Assist. The latter will pull you back using the inner brakes if you are about the sideswipe another car. The former will only beep at you.
Last edited by superswiss; Jan 21, 2026 at 03:48 PM.




The earlier models operate differently due to only having 1 camera as opposed to the multiple cameras on the later models.
Also, ALKA actually uses both the inner front and rear brakes to pull the car back into its lane. I'm not entirely sure why MB chose this brute force method, other than it's pretty effective at getting the driver's attention, especially if they are fading off into the land of dreams. But, Active Steering Assist keeps the car center by turning the front wheels, and not via individual braking torque on the rear wheels.
BTW, there's also a difference between Lane Keep Assist and Active Lane Keep Assist. The former is standard, whereas the latter is part of the Driver Assistance package. The basic LKA only vibrates the steering wheel if you drift outside of your lane, whereas Active Lane Keep Assist as said applies the inner brakes to pull you back. Same actually goes for Blind Spot Assist and Active Blind Spot Assist. The latter will pull you back using the inner brakes if you are about the sideswipe another car. The former will only beep at you.




Last edited by superswiss; Jan 21, 2026 at 04:38 PM.




As far as your "inner brake" reference, I have no idea what that is referencing; you are either braking or not, LKA always uses the brakes on the side of the car it wants to travel in, so if the car is veering left and needs to come back to the right, the car will brake the right rear brake caliper. Same thing for the other direction. But LKA does NOT use any front brake force to steer the car. This video explain pretty much al the systems:




As far as your "inner brake" reference, I have no idea what that is referencing; you are either braking or not, LKA always uses the brakes on the side of the car it wants to travel in, so if the car is veering left and needs to come back to the right, the car will brake the right rear brake caliper. Same thing for the other direction. But LKA does NOT use any front brake force to steer the car. This video explain pretty much al the systems:
You are making a good point, though, that I didn't consider at first. His weight on the steering wheel is essentially interpreted by the system as a deliberate steering effort to whatever side he has the weight on, so the system will attempt to counteract it. If the car comes near the lane marker, LKA will kick in, but for the most part it should be Active Steering that simply steers him back w/o using any brakes. This can actually be easily tested. Turn off LKA. If your theory holds, the weight would cause the car to drift into the other lane. Easy enough to test.
The rear pads are used for many things, such as traction control and torque vectoring, so the pad wear that some of you have observed may be misinterpreted. Your S63 for example doesn't have an electronic rear locking differential like most other 63 AMGs have, so things are certainly a bit different for you with the S63 vs my C63 which has the e-diff, so the rear brakes are used less for traction management and power distribution on the rear axel. The rear pads are also used to moderately slow down the vehicle when DISTRONIC is engaged. It uses the rear brakes first and only engages the front brakes if it needs to slow down more aggressively. So DISTRONIC in general wears the rear pads. Moderate braking in general wears the rear pads, even without DISTRONIC. This is because the electronic brakeforce distribution favors the rear brakes initially to minimize the nose dive a car would make if the front brakes engage first. So this keeps the car more leveled during braking. So these days, the rear pads are generally worn before the front pads, unless you are a very hard driver all the time and slamming the brakes from high speed. Most people doing some kind of moderate daily driving, though, will see the rear pads needing replacement first.
If your theory is correct, over time he would see more brake pad wear on the opposite side of where he has the weight. It's worth an experiment I suppose. I'd be curious about the results. These videos you are referring to are created by a PR department, not the engineers who actually implement these systems. They often have discrepancies.
Last edited by superswiss; Jan 21, 2026 at 08:46 PM.




You are making a good point, though, that I didn't consider at first. His weight on the steering wheel is essentially interpreted by the system as a deliberate steering effort to whatever side he has the weight on, so the system will attempt to counteract it. If the car comes near the lane marker, LKA will kick in, but for the most part it should be Active Steering that simply steers him back w/o using any brakes. This can actually be easily tested. Turn off LKA. If your theory holds, the weight would cause the car to drift into the other lane. Easy enough to test.
The rear pads are used for many things, such as traction control and torque vectoring, so the pad wear that some of you have observed may be misinterpreted. Your S63 for example doesn't have an electronic rear locking differential like most other 63 AMGs have, so things are certainly a bit different for you with the S63 vs my C63 which has the e-diff, so the rear brakes are used less for traction management and power distribution on the rear axel. The rear pads are also used to moderately slow down the vehicle when DISTRONIC is engaged. It uses the rear brakes first and only engages the front brakes if it needs to slow down more aggressively. So DISTRONIC in general wears the rear pads. Moderate braking in general wears the rear pads, even without DISTRONIC. This is because the electronic brakeforce distribution favors the rear brakes initially to minimize the nose dive a car would make if the front brakes engage first. So this keeps the car more leveled during braking. So these days, the rear pads are generally worn before the front pads, unless you are a very hard driver all the time and slamming the brakes from high speed. Most people doing some kind of moderate daily driving, though, will see the rear pads needing replacement first.
If your theory is correct, over time he would see more brake pad wear on the opposite side of where he has the weight. It's worth an experiment I suppose. I'd be curious about the results. These videos you are referring to are created by a PR department, not the engineers who actually implement these systems. They often have discrepancies.
I just wanted to warn the OP and others of the "cost" of using LKA.



