So - reluctantly, I test drove the G90 to compare to my S580.....
#26
Senior Member
#27
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 8,392
Received 3,825 Likes
on
2,557 Posts
2019 C63CS
perhaps I was not clear. I have stated in many posts that i have had several e class cars including one with a V8 .My s500 feels like a larger e class with the features of an sclass. I enjoy driving it daily and rarely have I ever had a passenger in the back seat. It is my daily driver. Its the right size for me. I agree it's not a sports car if thats the definition of a driver's car.
Last edited by superswiss; 01-20-2023 at 09:29 AM.
The following users liked this post:
martinlarose (01-20-2023)
The following users liked this post:
js_cls (01-20-2023)
#29
Senior Member
I was originally going to buy the SWB but when I saw a blue and a black one with the 19 inch wheels, it immediately turned me off. Initially I thought, I didn't want the unwanted attention and mistaken for a chauffeur hence picking the SWB vs LWB. However, I didn't realize 110mm/4 inches would make a big difference in the way it looks but it does. No offense to all SWB owners but to me, SWB lack the stature of the LWB making it feels like you are looking at an overgrown C-Class. Luckily when I called the dealer to change my order, I had two more days to make changes. I drove both but I wasn't paying attention to its looks when I was test driving and it didn't feel that much different the way it drove so I agree with you in no way it's a driver's car.
The following users liked this post:
Baloo588 (01-20-2023)
#30
MBWorld Fanatic!
I don't see anything wrong with a car built ground up to be comfortable and luxurious. This car isn't trying to pretend to be something it's not and that's a good thing.
Over on the Panamera forum you'll occasionally see guys complain about the stiffer ride, harder shifting, etc. The thing is if you "fixed" that it would take away from what that car is in the same way stiffening the ride here would take away from this cars intended purpose.
I do think the stock throttle mapping and steering effort is gonk with this car.
In comfort the steering seems to just flop the wheels one way or the other, just horrid, it's like the steering wheel is connected with a rubber band. IMO 1977 Chrysler New Yorker is not a steering metric one should aspire to when benchmarking your steering feel but that's this car in its normal mode.
On the throttle mapping it's said it needs to be so stupidly soft for chauffeuring duty. I disagree. In sport it just barely attains the goal of being on the soft end of normal. Any chauffeur that can't drive smoothly with a throttle at the softer end of what's in most cars in the country is not one I'd want to hire. I actually think it makes the car harder to drive smoothly as it sits in it's normal mode.
Over on the Panamera forum you'll occasionally see guys complain about the stiffer ride, harder shifting, etc. The thing is if you "fixed" that it would take away from what that car is in the same way stiffening the ride here would take away from this cars intended purpose.
I do think the stock throttle mapping and steering effort is gonk with this car.
In comfort the steering seems to just flop the wheels one way or the other, just horrid, it's like the steering wheel is connected with a rubber band. IMO 1977 Chrysler New Yorker is not a steering metric one should aspire to when benchmarking your steering feel but that's this car in its normal mode.
On the throttle mapping it's said it needs to be so stupidly soft for chauffeuring duty. I disagree. In sport it just barely attains the goal of being on the soft end of normal. Any chauffeur that can't drive smoothly with a throttle at the softer end of what's in most cars in the country is not one I'd want to hire. I actually think it makes the car harder to drive smoothly as it sits in it's normal mode.
#31
Senior Member
"What the grip levels and conditions of the road are, how close you are to the limits of grip and what the front wheels are actually doing, and the throttle response is direct and does exactly what you expect as you step into it and not soft and feathered that you barely get off the ground. The transmission will also have great shifts and give you feedback so you know what gear you are in, whether shifting manually or automatic"
That is true for driving on the Autobahn, but here......
That is true for driving on the Autobahn, but here......
#32
Junior Member
The following users liked this post:
martinlarose (01-20-2023)
#33
Senior Member
perhaps I was not clear. I have stated in many posts that i have had several e class cars including one with a V8 .My s500 feels like a larger e class with the features of an sclass. I enjoy driving it daily and rarely have I ever had a passenger in the back seat. It is my daily driver. Its the right size for me. I agree it's not a sports car if thats the definition of a driver's car.
A drivers car is one that allows me to be totally isolated from the road, the outside noise, and the outside world.
I can drive short trips and cross country isolated from the outside world... i love my definition of a drivers car
so my most favorite "drivers car" is an S (non AMG)
Second Place would probay be a full tilt sports car, and not my S AMG nor any sports sedan...
The AMG is Exhilarating.....but its a big heavy machine... i love the rocket drivetrain, but the suspension is not to my liking although i love both overall
oh.... W222's by the way
The following 2 users liked this post by kafklatsch:
martinlarose (01-20-2023),
tx170754 (01-20-2023)
#34
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,370
Received 2,660 Likes
on
1,707 Posts
2020 S560 4Matic
Totally agree. The length makes a huge impact
#35
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 8,392
Received 3,825 Likes
on
2,557 Posts
2019 C63CS
"What the grip levels and conditions of the road are, how close you are to the limits of grip and what the front wheels are actually doing, and the throttle response is direct and does exactly what you expect as you step into it and not soft and feathered that you barely get off the ground. The transmission will also have great shifts and give you feedback so you know what gear you are in, whether shifting manually or automatic"
That is true for driving on the Autobahn, but here......
That is true for driving on the Autobahn, but here......
#36
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,838
Received 1,585 Likes
on
982 Posts
Mercedes/Mazda/Genesis
I don't see anything wrong with a car built ground up to be comfortable and luxurious. This car isn't trying to pretend to be something it's not and that's a good thing.
Over on the Panamera forum you'll occasionally see guys complain about the stiffer ride, harder shifting, etc. The thing is if you "fixed" that it would take away from what that car is in the same way stiffening the ride here would take away from this cars intended purpose.
I do think the stock throttle mapping and steering effort is gonk with this car.
In comfort the steering seems to just flop the wheels one way or the other, just horrid, it's like the steering wheel is connected with a rubber band. IMO 1977 Chrysler New Yorker is not a steering metric one should aspire to when benchmarking your steering feel but that's this car in its normal mode.
On the throttle mapping it's said it needs to be so stupidly soft for chauffeuring duty. I disagree. In sport it just barely attains the goal of being on the soft end of normal. Any chauffeur that can't drive smoothly with a throttle at the softer end of what's in most cars in the country is not one I'd want to hire. I actually think it makes the car harder to drive smoothly as it sits in it's normal mode.
Over on the Panamera forum you'll occasionally see guys complain about the stiffer ride, harder shifting, etc. The thing is if you "fixed" that it would take away from what that car is in the same way stiffening the ride here would take away from this cars intended purpose.
I do think the stock throttle mapping and steering effort is gonk with this car.
In comfort the steering seems to just flop the wheels one way or the other, just horrid, it's like the steering wheel is connected with a rubber band. IMO 1977 Chrysler New Yorker is not a steering metric one should aspire to when benchmarking your steering feel but that's this car in its normal mode.
On the throttle mapping it's said it needs to be so stupidly soft for chauffeuring duty. I disagree. In sport it just barely attains the goal of being on the soft end of normal. Any chauffeur that can't drive smoothly with a throttle at the softer end of what's in most cars in the country is not one I'd want to hire. I actually think it makes the car harder to drive smoothly as it sits in it's normal mode.