S55 AMG, S65 AMG , S63 AMG (W220, W221) 2001 - 2013 (Two Generations)

S55 or S600?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-07-2006, 10:58 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Substance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
S55 or S600?

Which one to buy ? why?

one more question.

why is S65 amg 45000 more than S600? They have the same engine but S65 has bigger turbos. The differences of the turbos and larger brakes makes that much of a price difference?
Old 06-07-2006, 11:38 AM
  #2  
asg
Senior Member
 
asg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SE FL
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 S600
S65 also has bigger brakes and bigger wheels and more horsepower.

As far as a 55 or 600. pick to one with the options you want. the 600 comes with more standard features.

also you need to buy a 600 sport to get the amg body work
Old 06-07-2006, 01:13 PM
  #3  
Newbie
 
AMG_Family's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vegas
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 S55 AMG
S55. I drive a 2003 S55 AMG and there is nothing like it in the world. Obviously it is ultimately up to your choice and personality.

Personally, I liked the seats better and of course all of the sport set-ups that the 600 does not have. Plus, AMG are hand built engines at AMG where the 600 is a mercedes built engine and parts. From what my service advisor says at the dealer, the 55 AMG is a more reliable car than the 600. I, also, prefer the superchargers over the turbos.

The 65 AMG is a larger displacement 12 cylinder, again hand built at AMG. Even though it is owned by mercedes, AMG is definitely NOT mercedes technology. It is aftermarket technology that has been absorbed by the mercedes company and has become a part of mercedes. Which makes it even better now, because it is warrantied by mercedes AND there is a much closer relationship for the engineering of the automobiles.

My 2 cents.

Rich
Old 06-07-2006, 09:40 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
red00lght's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: South Florida
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 ML500
I've owned both a 2003 S55 and a 2003 CL600. I would say the 55 engine is tuned for more instant responsiveness whereas the V-12 TT in the 600 is much smoother...but also takes more urging to get moving. Once the hammer is down fully, the 600 pins me to the seat a bit harder than the S55 did. There doesn't seem to be any turbo lag with the V12....it just doesn't seem as willing to play if that makes sense?

The 55 engine was quite a bit louder as well and shifted firmer (AMG at work!). The 600 slams you against the seat but you can barely even hear the engine...and the shifts are like butter. The silent quarter mile is a weird experience!

Gas mileage is better in the V12 (that was a surprise to me since the TT don't have cylinder deactivation) and it sounds better at idle.

Bottom performance line...if you like to play alot with the car around town, get the S55. It is fun to beat on. If you want a smoother car that occasionally enjoys being a straight-line missile, get the S600.
Old 06-08-2006, 08:24 AM
  #5  
asg
Senior Member
 
asg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SE FL
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 S600
Well if you want the best of both, get a S65.
Old 06-09-2006, 05:05 AM
  #6  
Member
 
vladsf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 E63 AMG
good to drive S55, and good to be driven in S600.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: S55 or S600?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:46 PM.