S55 Kompressor mileage vs the N/A S55
any here own S55 Kompressor and also previously owned the regular N/A S55?
i wanted to find out what people are getting to mileage on their 2003-2006 kompressor V8's vs. the 2001-2002 N/A V8. This way, the gas mileage might have some relevance since you've driven owned both cars(and presumably driving them in similar fashion).
p.s. as a background of why I'm curious, when I went from my 01 E55 to my 2002 S55 - using very similar driving patterns over 2k miles, I consistently averaged 19mpg on the E55. However, the same engine on the S55 with heavier car, I usually got only 14-17mpg. I had one friend who even got 10-12mpg on similar S55.
Thx.
Patrick
any here own S55 Kompressor and also previously owned the regular N/A S55?
i wanted to find out what people are getting to mileage on their 2003-2006 kompressor V8's vs. the 2001-2002 N/A V8. This way, the gas mileage might have some relevance since you've driven owned both cars(and presumably driving them in similar fashion).
p.s. as a background of why I'm curious, when I went from my 01 E55 to my 2002 S55 - using very similar driving patterns over 2k miles, I consistently averaged 19mpg on the E55. However, the same engine on the S55 with heavier car, I usually got only 14-17mpg. I had one friend who even got 10-12mpg on similar S55.
Thx.
Patrick
IIRC, early in decade, identical AMGs would get ?2MPG more in NYC region use vs SF/LA use (assuming similar driving; highest poss oct fuel; and 60-80F temps)....
Would guess fuel everywhere in recent yrs has become more eco-modified w/implics for MPG, all else being equal...
The car definately gets better mileage at 80 - 85 than around 65 for some reason.
what is your mpg when you have blended hwy/street driving? thx.
Patrick






